Lopess Posted April 24, 2021 Report Share Posted April 24, 2021 On 24/04/2021 at 2:13 PM, Edwarf said: Haha yes, it's just ideas Expand There are some cool mods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakara Posted April 24, 2021 Report Share Posted April 24, 2021 (edited) get fat the icons of the building construction menu, as before Aggrandir les icônes du menu de construction du bâtiment, comme auparavant Edited April 24, 2021 by Dakara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted April 24, 2021 Report Share Posted April 24, 2021 On 24/04/2021 at 11:16 PM, Dakara said: get fat the icons of the building construction menu, as before Aggrandir les icônes du menu de construction du bâtiment, comme auparavant Expand More bigger? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakara Posted April 25, 2021 Report Share Posted April 25, 2021 On 24/04/2021 at 11:41 PM, Lion.Kanzen said: More bigger? Expand yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Player of 0AD Posted April 25, 2021 Report Share Posted April 25, 2021 - The working animations could be adapted so that each collected resource correspondence with 1 animation cycle. Exception: Collecting meat from animals, there it could be 1 animation cycle for 5 resources. - the order that a unit should die could be queuable, for example: "build that building, then die" - attacking fields and walls should have much lower priority in the automatical behaviour. Defending storehouses and other buildings in enemy territory as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yekaterina Posted April 25, 2021 Report Share Posted April 25, 2021 We can switch food to a flow-based economy: instead of 1 unit costing 50 food, we can change it to 1 unit costing 0.5 food per second, with an initial investment of 2 food maybe? This would be more realistic and prevents players from deleting farmers in late game. However, metal, stone and wood should not be flow-based because they are used to construct buildings and equipment; you do not need to repair these often so their flow consumption should be negligible. On 25/04/2021 at 10:21 AM, Player of 0AD said: the order that a unit should die could be queuable, for example: "build that building, then die" Expand That is convenient for Macedon, but too cruel 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakara Posted April 25, 2021 Report Share Posted April 25, 2021 On 13/07/2004 at 12:24 AM, phantom_rider2 said: Diplomacy should be more then just "Ally, Neutral, or Enemy." Maybe involve trading units as well as resources and maybe even territories, etc (like what I read about EE2, it has about everything as a possible trade). Expand Give unit to ally sould be good ! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpy Posted April 25, 2021 Report Share Posted April 25, 2021 Hi, I have a suggestion for player statistics to have 2 totals, 1 for ranked games played, 1 for non ranked/multiplayer There seems to be a phenomina where some players play multiplayer only until they get to expert level, and then go seal clubbing 1v1 on new players to raise their rank quickly without risk, if this suggestion were implimented it would give new players an indication the no rank or ~1200-1300 rank may not be accurate for the player with a low game total shown but 200+ multiplayer games under their belt, and make it easier to find a fair match for us noobs. Thanks for all the behind the scenes work on this game everyone, it's epic! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmriLahav Posted April 27, 2021 Report Share Posted April 27, 2021 Hey everybody, happy to report a LOT of new 0 A.D. music coming! I'm working on a bunch of tracks, and @Samulis contributed a lot of excellent ones as well! I've noted the request for more battle music, will see what I can come up with! Though to the best of my knowledge there are two combat tracks from Jeff Willet, Elusive Predator and First Sighting - is there only one on the game playlist? Might be worth checking. Thanks, Omri 8 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted April 27, 2021 Report Share Posted April 27, 2021 On 27/04/2021 at 6:11 AM, OmriLahav said: Though to the best of my knowledge there are two combat tracks from Jeff Willet, Elusive Predator and First Sighting - is there only one on the game playlist? Might be worth checking. Expand I just think that since they are similar taiko drum tracks some people confuse the 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizaka Posted May 13, 2021 Report Share Posted May 13, 2021 On 25/04/2021 at 5:05 PM, Pumpy said: seal clubbing Expand Wow, I love the way this was described. Hereinafter I'm reserving the name "seal clubber" for some 1400-1800 players. Can we have a "title" system where, with rank, come titles. Titles could be "Seal Clubber", "Amateur", "Normal", "Above Average" based on the rank of players you've won your games against? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yekaterina Posted May 13, 2021 Report Share Posted May 13, 2021 On 13/05/2021 at 9:51 PM, Dizaka said: Can we have a "title" system where, with rank, come titles. Titles could be "Seal Clubber", "Amateur", "Normal", "Above Average" based on the rank of players you've won your games against? Expand We can also determine it based on number of games won, ratio of games won, etc. Winning games and high KD ratio increase the xp of a player and titles are given based on do. This separates pros from nubs so that nubs don't get abused and pros can enjoy exhilarating matches. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted May 13, 2021 Report Share Posted May 13, 2021 On 19/04/2021 at 9:36 PM, Radiotraining said: spicen up the diplomatic game I think diplomacy is usually neglected Expand Over the last alphas, I think there was increasingly less offers by AI-enemies to become neutral or even allied; not that I'd much inclined to accept it. Reveal hidden contents And I just hate it when my ally accepts something like that and gives resources to someone I'm fighting... I'd still like some ~matrix to be available in-game to see what the relations are (it gets announced anyway, but I don't necessarily remember it). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 On 25/04/2021 at 11:06 AM, Dakara said: Give unit to ally sould be good ! Expand requires a bit advanced programming a couple of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceres Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 Hello! I'm not sure if this belongs here, but would you find addition of climate catastrophes (flooding, storm, earth quake, volcanic eruption) interesting and feasible to add? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maroder Posted May 26, 2021 Report Share Posted May 26, 2021 On 26/05/2021 at 6:22 PM, Ceres said: addition of climate catastrophes (flooding Expand There is already a map that uses flooding. you can find it in the random map category under the filter "Trigger maps" and it is called "Extinct Volcano" 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azayrahmad Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 I'm wondering if it is desirable for Siege Towers to do what they historically did: capturing walls? I think it makes more sense than to have it as arrow-shower vehicles like they are now. Due to infantry cannot capture walls, I think it would be interesting to have gates be captured by siege towers and letting infantry to enter the gates as an alternative of ramming the gates. Speaking of gates, I think it is weird that siege towers can pass through the gates, considering its height. Perhaps we can limit passable units based on footprint height as well? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Player of 0AD Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 On 27/05/2021 at 6:41 AM, azayrahmad said: I'm wondering if it is desirable for Siege Towers to do what they historically did: capturing walls? I think it makes more sense than to have it as arrow-shower vehicles like they are now. Due to infantry cannot capture walls, I think it would be interesting to have gates be captured by siege towers and letting infantry to enter the gates as an alternative of ramming the gates. Speaking of gates, I think it is weird that siege towers can pass through the gates, considering its height. Perhaps we can limit passable units based on footprint height as well? Expand Recently I watched a historical video which says that the pop-culture siege towers (which are used to capture walls) are rather wrong. In reality, the siege towers where used to shoot at the defenders (and to destroy gates / walls / buildings) So they should be fine. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 On 27/05/2021 at 7:10 AM, Player of 0AD said: So they should be fine. Expand DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 I'm not sure we can restrict the Z axis. I think we use A 2D pathfinder 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azayrahmad Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 On 27/05/2021 at 7:10 AM, Player of 0AD said: Recently I watched a historical video which says that the pop-culture siege towers (which are used to capture walls) are rather wrong. In reality, the siege towers where used to shoot at the defenders (and to destroy gates / walls / buildings) So they should be fine. Expand Wait really? So they are not used to pour soldiers into the walls? I was about to think of a way to unload garrisoned soldiers into wall turrets. I wonder what the top part of the tower is intended for. I imagined that it is supposed to unfold a plank in front of the wall, letting soldiers to run onto the wall. Probably it is actually just to let archers shoot over the wall easily? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Player of 0AD Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 I just read on Wikipedia: The unfolded planks were a novelty in the middle ages 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 Siege Towers combatted units on walls so that ladders could be brought up. We need ladder teams. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyrrhicVictoryGuy Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 but nobody uses stone walls 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soloooy0 Posted May 27, 2021 Report Share Posted May 27, 2021 ok it's been a while since I played, but all ibero games have stone walls at the beginning and in jebel barkal a real use of siege towers would be useful, and in some long games or mordor in danubius there are real labyrinths of towers and houses :V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.