Leaderboard

This mod is in maintenance mode But will be updated for the following cases: Bug fixes Compatibility with new 0 A.D. versions Any reasonable pull request somebody might want to make Thanks to all the 0 A.D. players who found it useful. Nani

Trabajo de Duileoga Work by Duileoga

Hi Feldfeld my dear friend, i'm humbly the best player of 0 A.D. so je vais continuer en français mais j'aimerais bien participer à l'édition 2 ! Bien cordialement signé chocapoccaaaaAAAaaAaAaAaaa

I was 1 year old when this topic was written. Guys this is the biggest necropost i've seen. It's like writing your name over cave art.

The forums are dedicated to 0 A.D. but they could use your support too Check them out at: Tonto Clan (nice chats with the tonto_clan members) Phoenix Clan (Our c--lead designer Ken Wood has posted many details about the game not availible anywhere else right now but here) 0 A.D. Empire (a whole forum for 0 A.D. made by our good friend John) Thanks for stopping by their forums!

Hi i can play if there is players missing

I was thinking if we can replace the current UI design of tree selection from To (wireframe) Some reason we should do it. The in-frame pic shows which tree have you select currently. Wood icon instead of build icon tells that this tree is not for building but for wood collection. Extend use case - If we ever implement the idea of planting forest, then this will be good for diffrentiating platable trees and non-plantables. @wowgetoffyourcellphonewhat do you think?

range is fine now I think. it needs to be no less than that of archers, for adequate protection. I would reduce the max number of arrows from CCs: now it's 23, which makes the CC super strong even in p3. that's too many arrows for a civilian building, there's fortresses and towers to provide that kind of fire.

Do you like Nomad game? If not, how do you want them to evolve? I would love to hear your ideas, maybe someone will come here and incorporate them into a future version of the game. The goal is to make the game mode more enjoyable and diverse. 1)A few loose ideas: Research phase: For one minute you cannot build a building. This is to reduce the chance of good spawns and not to be too late if we chose to walk a little before building. 2)Then, the first city center is built 75% faster, in order to increase the pace of the game and compensate for the first minute of the game. 3)Use predefined resources so as not to disadvantage certain civilizations at the start, the resources at the start would be for example: 300 food 800 wood 800 stone 800 Metal SO it like 300 food 300 wood 300 stone 300 Metal after the CC built. Sélucide seems very advantaged but not very serious.... Sometime if no stone you can't build barack fast and you take late or can't make first tech. 4) Nomad ultra alpha mod : you start phase 2 with 40 population(10 womans 30 troops) and tons of ressource (like 1000 of each ressource= 1 cc and some building ), the goal is same but it more speed cuz good population and ressource and phase 2.

Hand drawn icons are miles ahead of renders in terms of aesthetics.

yeah, use google instead, much better.

I will also add that, for now I don't really see a point in doing a (significant enough) cavalry nerf. At the end of the day, infantry is still hugely useful in 1v1 and in team games as well, a transition to cavalry if not well timed can just lead to being overrun by infantry. For the current state I only see a small damage nerf to skirm cav to be interesting. I'd consider the gameplay of mostly ranged infantry CS to be worse. There is not even an attempt in transitioning away from a unit we make from the beginning of the game. Instead of fine tuning stuff like this, I'd be more interested in some more radical changes, such as for example straight up halving the attack rate of all ranged units (so reducing their DPS by that much), accompanied by a melee cav nerf. That could rehabilate melee infantry and maybe champions as well. Experiment, bring new units to the light, try to reach a new balance.

I was 25! Hadn't even hit my peak yet! (28 is when I really started partying and 35 is when I started to calm down).

Bien reçu mon cher There is no missing player but there is no limit to the number of players, so i'll happily register you

but not its increase with phasing, right? that's very significant.

I was 17 years old.

Indeed, I don't actually agree that the little aliased picture of a tree is more aesthetically pleasing than that nicely done wood icon.

our Romans are based on the middle republic.They don't use Germans and Gauls until much later.What they can have are Balearic slingers, Cretan archers, and Numidian cavalry.

0ad I think it doesn't support Windows XP/Vista /2000 anymore.

Will running be consistent ? Probably through formations : skirmishing formations would be a good fit for runners.

Colors are obtained from the player name by applying a specific function. The function is described here. The function's documentation also refers to this page on StackOverflow.

what's 0/10? the number of workers? in that case the wood icon would be misleading I believe.

It is not a necessary feature but good to have feature. More from asthetics and UX point of view.

@Lion.Kanzen Thx man. Still confused by that number like "5.0 pierce" , one along percentage value.

For Rome, i suggest keep their identity with no spear infantery at P1 but up the spear unit, rang 3 like skiritai for same cost as skiritai. Rome is pretty good infantery, we need feel it. Than add phase 3 auxiliaries unit (mercenary) : Archer infanterie and cavalerie archer and cavalerie sword (germans or gauls) and later special unit (like master dog or something, master bird for scout)

Thats why we have wood icon instead of hammer (build) icon for the tree. If tress only purpose is to give wood and we should show only wood icon then for hunts as well we shouldn;t show animal and only meat icon with food value. But showing the exact animal provide better experience to user and also user can relate to it. if fields only purpose is to add food tick and their no need to differentiate beetween rice field and normal 0ad fields, apple trees and other type of food source. This new design point is to show what tree he has selected and gives identity to the selected entity with right info. Now for wireframe I just took atlas image to show the same. It can be designed better way.

But I think this will make the game more interesting, otherwise we don't need to make a variety of fruit trees, just berry bushes are enough, it is also fun to experience biodiversity and recognize some botanical knowledge from the maps of different geographical environments.

ERROR: Failed to find matching prop point called "garrisoned" in model "art/meshes/structural/maya_protoclassic/wonder.dae" for actor "structures/maya_protoclassic/wonder.xml255"

be patient that the second attack will come without the need for such a primitive implementation.

Oh, yes I am referring to the army camp not the barracks

Well, a tree is generally a tree. And the only use of a tree in the game is for its wood, so it is more important that it is made clear that it is a wood source than what type of tree it is or what actor it uses.

Do you mean the army camp? The castrum is the barrack. I would be in favor of the former but not the later.

I will use your example. B C if C has the same hitpoints C is more weaker. I like to make things more visual. Next time I'll add icons. The higher the resistance, the lower the damage.

I created a simple explanation, I had to see how AoM worked (it's the same formula). I take the explanation from FAQ. And my calculator.

The only way to get 64-bit support fast is to replace the 32-bit version, even that is probably more than a day of work, but more or less straight forward. What I did is cross compile 0ad which is somewhat troublesome, my changes are from replacing buildsystem, fixing deps or even replace them, fixing cross compile bugs and more. Reviewing means accept the changes and committing them. The developer on which shoulder this would likely fall is busy adding Vulkan support and still has font rendering on his plate which are in my opinion much more important. Also I prefer to wait for the git migration which is in the works. The takeaway from my work is that there is little in the way of a straight replacement, all else is somewhat cumbersome.

there are bees as particles in the hyrule conquest mod, you might want to use those if you get the permission

Hi, first video in 2022 ... By watching it you'll noticed many errors at models, but i'll solve them ...

I think we have enough votes to conclude that the ram change and the ptolemy, Iphicrates nerfs do not have enough support. @wraitii does a November 1 release of the next version sound feasible/ideal? Seems like the second round of the tournament will happen soon, so it would be nice to release in time.

Congratulations to for winning the first edition of the Friendly Tournament Series! You can find the brackets, with all results and standings here: https://challonge.com/l9vi81d9 I will announce in the next post the second edition. Let's try to have this a regular event in the 0 A.D. multiplayer community!

could we see all this great matches at a youtube(s)? maybe as dual commentary?

Yayoi Mod (Yayoi village) @Lopess @wackyserious @AIEND @Ultimate Aurelian @Langbart @wowgetoffyourcellphone @Genava55 @bad player @no name yet @DIYARAKUZA @Radiotraining @Lion.Kanzen @Carltonus @Wesley @LordGood -Disculpen las molestias*

Milenium A.D Mod; (umayad) (Rus de kiev) (Carolingios) (Norse) (Byzantin) @Lopess @Stan` @Lion.Kanzen @wowgetoffyourcellphone @wackyserious @Darkcity @asterix @Carltonus @rossenburg @Palaiologos @Old Roman @Trinketos @Gurken Khan Disculpen las molestias*

This needs to be printed on calendars and deep pictures on instagram

If the decay would be prevented then they wouldn't go to Gaia. I don't see the point of building walls in neutral or enemy territory when they quickly go out of your control.

Maybe that should be changed?

I suggest to keep 30 corpses at least otherwise the gameplay suffers alot (you won't know where your unit died and how many otherwise). Performance only starts getting bad when you have > 50 corpses lying around

I think it is nice to see units running for their lives. It is gimmicky but it is not super harmful either. I think we can leave it as it is. I was thinking on creating something similar to the patrol command. You order your troops to battle-charge to a particular area and they do it using their run speed. There are things like status effects, so giving them reduced gather capacity seems to be also a possible status effect. Maybe I eventually get to try to mod it, as just chatting gets us nowhere. I would like the idea that once you give the command, the units are now out of control and attack viciously. That is fairly historically accurate, since sometimes if a command was given it could not be recalled. Also it creates a risk in ordering a battle charge. Furthermore it would be nice if it was a timed effect where it is unlikely to be able to use it twice. So you could decide to open with a battle charge and reach the opponent quickly. The second option would be to first engage in melee combat and once it starts, to use the charge to get the rear units into the action. The third option would be to see if you can win the battle without and use the charge to destroy the opponent when they try to retreat. A battle charge could be a way to overrun the opponent, but on the same time it could mean that your own units run to their death. It would make timing of the charge decisive. Also ranged units could be decisive if they can seduce the opposing player to order an ill-chosen charge. Anyway, the idea remains an idea until it is turned into a mod.