Trinketos Posted July 23, 2019 Report Share Posted July 23, 2019 48 minutes ago, Lion.Kanzen said: @Trinketos vos estabas preguntando por el servidor o el cliente? The server xd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted July 23, 2019 Report Share Posted July 23, 2019 Just now, Trinketos said: The server xd alguno pagado por el equipo con los clientes mencionados. No es como GitHub. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeXoR Posted July 23, 2019 Report Share Posted July 23, 2019 Sorry for doubleposting but I felt like my last comment was a bit harsh, @WhiteTreePaladin Yes, switching to another revision system like GIT on our server is an option, but GitHub is not IMO. And, yes, I also don't think GetHub is exceptionally bad right now. But just a slight change in direction in the management can make a service like this basically useless for us. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted July 23, 2019 Report Share Posted July 23, 2019 @FeXoR I don't have anything against Microsoft, and they haven't been bad lately. I use the Github repo because we don't have our own hosted git repo. I definitely agree that it's preferable to host it ourselves instead of relying on Github, and I'd gladly switch to a WFG hosted git repo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted July 23, 2019 Report Share Posted July 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, WhiteTreePaladin said: @FeXoR I don't have anything against Microsoft, and they haven't been bad lately. I use the Github repo because we don't have our own hosted git repo. I definitely agree that it's preferable to host it ourselves instead of relying on Github, and I'd gladly switch to a WFG hosted git repo. What about gitlab? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted July 24, 2019 Report Share Posted July 24, 2019 5 hours ago, Lion.Kanzen said: What about gitlab? I'm not familiar with gitlab, but I think it's probably still preferred for WFG to host its own repo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarcoma Posted July 24, 2019 Report Share Posted July 24, 2019 You are the server with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
historic_bruno Posted July 24, 2019 Report Share Posted July 24, 2019 12 hours ago, sarcoma said: You are the server with https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce I've used it when contributing to a few projects, and it seems pretty good. Our Evil Twin uses it. I wonder if it would duplicate most of what we have on Phabricator though? It seems overkill to have both, unless we only use gitlab as a git server (not sure what the advantage of that is). 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatherbushido Posted July 24, 2019 Report Share Posted July 24, 2019 1 hour ago, historic_bruno said: Our Evil Twin uses it. Add a link, add a link ;-) 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
historic_bruno Posted July 25, 2019 Report Share Posted July 25, 2019 12 hours ago, fatherbushido said: Add a link, add a link ;-) To what, a sign-in page? 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fabio Posted July 27, 2019 Report Share Posted July 27, 2019 Related: https://www.zdnet.com/article/github-starts-blocking-developers-in-countries-facing-us-trade-sanctions/ However it's not GitHub itself to blame here, but US government. IIRC we ourselves have a team member from Iran. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted July 27, 2019 Report Share Posted July 27, 2019 42 minutes ago, fabio said: Related: https://www.zdnet.com/article/github-starts-blocking-developers-in-countries-facing-us-trade-sanctions/ However it's not GitHub itself to blame here, but US government. IIRC we ourselves have a team member from Iran. I don't think we do. (Lost communication pretty much immediately after attempting to join - due to issues in the country at the time.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balduin Posted May 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2020 On 7/24/2019 at 2:59 AM, WhiteTreePaladin said: I'm not familiar with gitlab, but I think it's probably still preferred for WFG to host its own repo. GitLab is the software which allows you to host a git repository. GitLab has features like a web interface with issue tracking and merge request management. GitLab is used by the Debian project and FramaGit. GitLab.com is a service by the company GitLab Inc. GitLab.com is similar to GitHub as you can create repositories for free. However, you can do the same on FramaGit which is part of the french non profit organization FramaSoft. In short: Git -> distributed version control tool GitLab -> Web based self hosting software frontent for Git GitLab.com -> GitLab hosted by GitLab Inc. (company) FramaGit -> GitLab hosted by FramaSoft (ngo) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki1950 Posted May 16, 2020 Report Share Posted May 16, 2020 Further info git does not handle art assets gracefully or other binary blobs as git calls them too many of them and both GitHub and GitLab start charging you money to use there service. Enjoy the Choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7600 Posted May 17, 2020 Report Share Posted May 17, 2020 Wait, so at some point in time, Github gives you an "ultimatum" if you have too many .pngs? "Pay us or your repo is gone", that sort of thing? If that's the case, then I'll delete my repo by myself. No need to wait for them to do it. I didnt't really have a lot stuff anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted May 17, 2020 Report Share Posted May 17, 2020 24 minutes ago, m7600 said: Wait, so at some point in time, Github gives you an "ultimatum" if you have too many .pngs? "Pay us or your repo is gone", that sort of thing? If that's the case, then I'll delete my repo by myself. No need to wait for them to do it. I didnt't really have a lot stuff anyway. Git != github Git = versionning technology Github = website hosting git repository. Don't worry about it 0 A.D. has a mirror. If we had too many pngs we'd know 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m7600 Posted May 17, 2020 Report Share Posted May 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Stan` said: Don't worry about it 0 A.D. has a mirror. If we had too many pngs we'd know Lol, true : D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badosu Posted May 17, 2020 Report Share Posted May 17, 2020 (edited) A pretty good lightwheight option if you want self-hosted and only want the vcs: https://gitea.io/en-us/ I'm a fan of sourcehut too, extremely simple and fast: https://sourcehut.org Edited May 17, 2020 by badosu 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivoecpereira Posted June 23, 2020 Report Share Posted June 23, 2020 On 5/16/2020 at 6:50 PM, Loki1950 said: Further info git does not handle art assets gracefully or other binary blobs as git calls them too many of them and both GitHub and GitLab start charging you money to use there service. Enjoy the Choice From what I am aware, this would only happen if you would use their service and not a self-hosted version of it. If you do, I don't think you would face such issues. I understand not using GitHub at this point - I do however believe they will be here for many many years, but that is another story - but at this time, having a self-hosted GitLab CE instance would make wonders for the project, having everything that's needed in one single place. What is currently blocking WFgames to move to a self-hosted solution like this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted June 23, 2020 Report Share Posted June 23, 2020 2 hours ago, ivoecpereira said: What is currently blocking WFgames to move to a self-hosted solution like this? Well we have a lot of art files which will take more space than SVN, because there is actually a big svn encompassing the repo and three others which are literally full of stuff. Also we currently use the combo arcanist/Phabricator which allows us to use either git or svn seamlessly. Ideally we'd have a better git mirror which is something @Itms proposed sometime ago. I'll let him give more details about that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.