Jump to content

badosu

Balancing Advisors
  • Posts

    829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by badosu

  1. This is great, good job!
  2. Congratulations @Langbartthis looks awesome!
  3. ~Omg no balmaps, must be a conspiracy!~ Nevermind, I'm dumb
  4. It does, provides fair distribution of wood in phase 2 range
  5. Yeah, would be interesting to do a 4-player map for 1v1 with random start positions, similar to how its done on SC2 tournaments
  6. Balanced maps has a grid configuration for starting positions in certain maps (slopes and bal hyrcanian shores). The algorithm can be adapted to make 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. and 7. is just adjusting the already existent place players in a circle algorithm (adjusting by map size and radius of circle) 5. and 5.1. is just adjusting the algorithm to use an ellipse with starting angle
  7. I think it would be nice to see sparta developed to an extreme, even if balance might be challenging. Making it mostly eco-driven run by helots could provide both a great differentiation value and be historically accurate.
  8. Definitely feasible, though I'd not personally use it.
  9. I don't understand this argument, do we have a weekly release or a way to get a recent-ish release in an easy manner? Otherwise I think this is mostly noop
  10. To be frank, all civs should have log-ram on phase 2. The fact we have to wait for phase 3 to have siege is a big issue imo in terms of pace. We should be able to have quick games without requiring a resign Then celts could have some op bonus for log-rams
  11. The preview must be an image crafted by yourself, it is also very buggy if you don't provide an exact format that the game expects (otherwise might crash the browser or bug the preview itself). On the map json you need to include: ` "Preview" : "<yourmapname>.png", ` and then provide the png on ├── art │ └── textures │ └── ui │ └── session │ └── icons │ └── mappreview -> <yourmapname>.png
  12. Some feedback there: > The biggest problem in this game is the networking. It seems to have the same sort of networking issues Age of Empires did before the HD revamp, except worse. Once you hit a 100+ units for each player, the gameplay slows down dramatically. If the multiplayer desyncs, the game is over and there's no way to continue. The unit pathfinding is pretty janky as well. > I've played it, we liked it, but the multiplayer issues made it a non-starter for us. And while other changes have been made, it doesn't seem like any real networking optimizations have been made in years. The only recent change that might help is them adding a global population max in addition to a per player one, so you can keep the lag from getting too bad but add more units per player as other people get eliminated. But it's not enough.
  13. Also, biome features looks incredibly awesome in this release btw
  14. None of the issues I pointed out present on the replay are related to the terrains for that matter, in my opinion the bottleneck is somewhere else. Not saying there's anything we can do at the moment to address it immediately with the manpower we have, just pointing things out.
  15. My answer would be no until we have at least specs asynced, ideally with perf optimizations and network rework. Look at this post that is on first page on hacker news atm: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26558180 My first idea of sharing gameplay was to post this video for reference: After inspecting it for a bit notice how much attention is brought to lag and having to kick specs, the trees inside walls, lack of hotkeys, having to use low graphic settings, etc etc... It was just embarassing, eventually I had to edit the post.
  16. More importantly it would tie in with how logistics were a great advantage for Rome, imagine making a forward cc and being able to deploy units faster, seems like a great idea to me. Keep in mind a side effect might be op traders and eco due to walk speed, so perhaps we should disallow the bonus for traders, women or citizen soldiers not in formation.
  17. look whos talking xD Yeah, I find the muting on certain words kinda silly but understandable, especially considering the most toxic behavior is able to work around that, just live with it I guess.
  18. Reinstala a bagaça com a versão estável, com certeza um bug na versão de desenvolvimento.
  19. - Go to your mods path (see here) - Remove any file or folder with balanced_maps or balanced-maps in the name - Download the latest development version: - Create a folder named balanced-maps and place the file there - ???? - Profit By the way, this is the development version, so if you're having trouble with this procedure (which I don't recommend if you want your 0ad clean of buggy code) I don't recommend proceeding. There are 2 fixes that still require being completed, a crash on map browser due to map icon loading doing huehue brbr stuff and the game stanza messages to avoid nobs trying to join host without mod.
  20. Você está apertando ctrl+click?
  21. Not true at all, depends on mapgen and build
  22. Ok, I was able to reproduce, happens on Page 7. I can't identify why an asset might be causing the issue (slopes probably?), Cross loads without issues. Did the icon format change between releases?
  23. @naniI wasn't able to reproduce the error, though could be an issue with packaging (testing without the packaged version)
  24. Another interesting discussion is that we automatically predict a units position during targeting. On aoe2 for example this is a technology 'ballistics'. Not sure how much sense there is in having that as a technology but it is a good thing in terms of gameplay diversity.
×
×
  • Create New...