Leaderboard

XIII Mod West. East West vs East Nómadas @wackyserious @Lion.Kanzen @Stan` @wowgetoffyourcellphone @Lopess @Old Roman @asterix @Carltonus @Gurken Khan Disculpen las molestias*

Quick mockup ideas for the Cadmean Citadel (Wonder):

MAD Alpha 26 is uploaded and just awaiting verification.

Zagros Mountains progress.

Depending on how you count maybe 2023 is the 20 years of 0 A.D. would be nice to have a vale of tempe so we can do after before screenshots

Essentially, yeah. If they had slaves, call them Slaves (Romans, Greek civs, Carthaginians, et al). If they didn't have slaves (Han), call it Conscript Laborer or something. Was just saying the handwringing over the word "slave" is virtue signal-y.

music.zip This mod replaces some 0ad background music of certain civs. Changes 1. The main theme has been changed to Plevne Marsi. 2. Han has some confusing buildings replaced with Carthaginian alternatives, namely the storehouse, house and farmstead. 3. Exact changes to music: Han: added popular modern Chinese songs but also some historical tunes as well as military marches. However, there is no completely off topic nonsense. See Tinh is definitely out of context of 0ad and it's Vietnamese Persia: Ey Iran, Vatanam and some Tajik songs Seleucids: A lot of Turkish songs, Cirpinirdi Karadeniz, Plevne, Esger (Asker) Marsi... Carthaginians: Allah Sidi Mansour Ya Baba Ptolemies: Golden Scurubs

XIII Mod; (Nómadas) @wackyserious Disculpen las molestias*

Baltic Nordic biome, wip @maroder

I've never had much luck with distinguishing units in a huge blob, other than watching what they do. Skirmishers and archers stop further away and fire, with melee units move all the way up and fight at close range. Beyond that, there are some things you can infer from the civs people choose. Usually people choose a civ for its special units. People who play Britons probably like using slingers. People who play Carthaginians probably want those merc cav. I used to play Spartans all the time because I liked using skiritai. Gaul players often like to do cav rushes. And so on. You can tailor your army a bit around what you think your opponent will probably use. Maybe this isn't the best example because I obviously lost the game, but when ValihrAnt and I played yesterday, he chose Han. Plus I knew he was a great player. From that, it was pretty obvious he was going to be sending sword cav to go after me in Phase 1. So I built my early army around defense from sword cav. He easily won the game, but at least he didn't completely wipe me out in the first 5 minutes with his sword cav. I survived long enough to hit phase 2.

Please don't call it "slave" or "serf". Better would be "skilled worker", "peasant", or "freeman". Peasants were not slaves, they got 1 to 30 acres of personal farmland and kept he harvest from it, and had more days off than the average American worker. "Freemen were, as the name suggests, the peasants with the most freedom. They had less obligation to the lord, but they were still subject to manorial jurisdiction and custom." Certain groups would like to see slavery restored in various areas, and games can have a formative experience for people, especially children. Do we want the next generation to think that slavery was so ubiquitous in ancient times that there must have been some good in it? It is not even historically accurate to say that slavery was ubiquitous in every culture around 0 A.D. Check out this mini-documentary, "Modern TV - How did English medieval peasants see themselves?" about slaves vs serfs vs peasants. "In the area known as Danelore there are actually relatively few serfs recorded, which is interesting. They're mostly Freemen, they mostly pay rent. And, in some areas, particularly Northumberland for example in the very north of England, there is a curious thing about Fanes and Dranes. And, they actually paid tax based on the number of horned beasts they kept which is a complete hangover from the very earliest days of the medieval period." (7:39 m:s in the documentary)

Persas; Terra Magna Mod; Zapotecas (ciudad) (Luchando) Disculpen las molestias*

Right, but I wanted them to be useful in a wide variety of land combat situations and didn't want to be too specific, like: "+1 pierce resistance and +2.36 crush attack for advanced rank basket weavers between the 5 minute mark and minute 12 within his skirmish formation."

The main issue with sending infantry is that you use and lose your economic units. I have been thinking that adding a slave or serf type of economic unit would allow for citizen soldiers to be more efficiently used as military units. The idea is that it has better gather rate than CS infantry, which would relegate CS infantry's economic value as mainly supplementary while there is a break in fighting. I am not yet sure if this would be a better game after the unit is added (it absolutely depends on the units stats), and there is yet to be any mod that implements such a feature into otherwise vanilla 0ad. It is worth noting that infantry can be used very successfully in p1 too, usually if there is a border fight.

Terra magna Mod; Escitas; (Campamento) (Guerreando) Disculpen las molestias*

Terra magna Mod; Xiongnu; (campamento) (Emigrando) (saqueando) (Batallando)

Hello everyone! I hereby present a 0 A.D. mod aimed at evaluating the rating of players. Official mod page on GitLab here. Introduction Before diving into the description, let me introduce the problem this mod aims to solve. In 0 A.D., the ELO system is used to rank players in the lobby. This is good; but is it representative of the players' skills? As you know, the rating system in 0 A.D. only takes into account 1v1 rated games. Team games do not contribute to the ELO score of a player, as well as 1v1 unrated games. Also, the scoring system only takes into account the outcome of a game (victory/defeat) and not the "performance" during the game. Can we do better? This mod uses statistics. It extracts data from all the replays of games you (the mod user) have played. So, if you have played 20 games (1v1s, team games, other..) with a player in the lobby whose name is (for example) strangeJokes, the mod will assign a rating to strangeJokes based on the 20 games you've played with them. The rating system The functioning of the rating system is described in detail here, but in short what it does is: it considers the average performance of the player during the entire game (and not only at game's end). the rating assigned to a player is a percentage: for example, a player with a rating of 5.00 performs a 5% better than other players on average, while a player with a rating of -5.00 performs a 5% worse than other players on average. you can customize the rating system by giving more importance to military, economy, exploration or other factors to the aim of calculating ratings. Keep in mind that this mod is based on statistics; data are taken from your (the mod user) replays. Statistics might not be fully representative of reality; therefore, a player's rating could be inaccurate, especially if you have played few games with that player. The more you play with a player, the more accurate the rating of that player is. Installation ‣Recommended: LocalRatings can be downloaded from the game menu: Settings > Mod Selection > Download Mods. ‣Alternatively: Click here to download the latest release. Install following the official 0 A.D. guide: How to install mods? Alternative downloads: Latest Release (.pyromod) | Latest Release (.zip) | Older Releases Latest version announcement Explanatory pictures Contribute The public repository is at this page. Everybody is very welcome to contribute, suggest, fork or simply give feedback. Have fun!

Sounds like something to experiment with. It’s hard to figure out how it’ll be different than women. Making them captureable or capable of uprisings or something’s seems like a potentially interesting solution.

Is expansion actually required if we have plenty of resources around CC? You still can use Barracks to reach that 25%, right? Maybe also reducing resources ( metal? )would help?

I get that. But it would also be nice if the people who spit the most vitriol from the depths of 4chan weren't the same people that rank among the most excited for 'slaves.' I'm not saying it's everyone, but there is a large overlap.

it would be nice to use a very general term so we don't need to worry about historical accuracy on a civ by civ basis. Alsoo, it would be obvious that it is the same unit with the same stats.

https://www.worldhistory.org/Serf/ I'm going to leave this here and not get into an argument.

Started work on a better Zagros Mountains map.

Now, if only we could distinguish between "highland", "midland", and "lowland." Not make it a requirement for every map script to use those distinctions, but just have the ability available. So that we could have pine forests in the mountains and oak forests in the midlands, and palm forests in the lowlands. Things like that. And then put wolves and bears in the highlands and midlands, with lions in the lowlands. Goats in the highlands, camels in the lowlands. I'm sure you get it. Maybe too complicated.

This could be a great start for the Huns and then later the Mongols.

Persia Biome: Highlands Rocky, grey/beige mountain terrain, plus a snow covered rock terrain for the summits. Trees are various pine species, but sparse. Hunt are goats and bears. Buzzards circle overhead. Midlands Scrub terrains with pine species and bush_mediterranean. Cliff textures have a hint of brown and red (similar to the Indian cliff textures, but less strong). Animals are goats, lions, bears Lowlands A mix of tree types: Deciduous trees and pines, with the occasional decorative date palm. Grass terrains predominate with some stony/rocky terrains for decor. Animals are sheep, goats, deer.

LOL guys this is not medioeval england, this is ancient world, where slavery was a totally acknowledged social status, slaves were called slaves and were legally owned by other people (regardless of how much free time they had, which varied very much I guess).

That's a good point. Calling the unit one of those options you discussed also gives us more freedom to design the unit to suit gameplay, which was my main motivation to investigate its potential. I think the stats and attributes we gave it are still valid, even with carth training them from markets, since its not unreasonable to think you could hire them from the market. The cost we were thinking about was 60 food 20 metal, that is still reasonable I think.

I'm not Phyzic, but if I ignore that claim I like the list. Please don't remove it

One of the best parts is that we can experiment with some things, which is something we never could on phabricator. It would always be an endless argument and usually the status quo was just maintained. In this mod, we can try a simple ptol nerf to the houses for example, and if this makes a good difference during play on the next mod release, we can keep it, or change/remove if needed. Also people are actually willing to test features XD.

For me, yes

I think from cc in p2 would be best to be honest. Perhaps Carthage could train from markets too.

I can do that. Want slaves trained from the Storehouse & Farmstead, ala DE, or elsewhere?

Rams can handle nearly unlimited amounts of attacks from skirmishers and other ranged units like archers while taking basically no damage. They can also take out other rams, but it's best to use sword cav or swordsmen to do that. Trying to use skirmishers against rams is a common mistake people make when they're starting out. If you've got an opponent who does that, then send the rams forward.

No need separate just 4-5 herous available but maximum to be used per game 3.. so we can keep these 2 totaly useless herous and maybe get some finally adequate. So naval will get untouched. Also other civs can get some "naval or similar useless bonuses for theri 4th heroes"...

Fine. Or just add an extra hero for Athens.

There's a "." missing in your exact spelling.

Mayas Mod; @Lopess@Stan`@wowgetoffyourcellphone @Trinketos @Ultimate Aurelian @Genava55 @Gurken Khan

My best guess of winner: ValihrAnt (2322) vs thephilosopher (1305) -> ValihrAntStockfish (1833) vs Dakara (1772) -> FrancaisFeldfeld (2169) vs kun0 (1547) -> novaxEdwarf (1861) vs PhiliptheSwaggerless (1646) -> Nastasen If you need still one player I could join with any publicly shared account

How about the suggestion to add reddish clay soil under the metal mines? I did it in another post. This idea comes from Stronghold Crusader II. Iron oxide. This would make the mining area more noticiable.

Mayorcete always play the default map except if is testing a new civ.

If a user has to change the default filter to something like old maps or testing maps to see the lower quality ones, I see no risk of the above being the case. There might indeed be little value of keeping them but the argument made against removal on the patch is reasonable enough for me given there is no harm. There was something off with the textures, glad if it was fixed. Still might be worth bringing up the discussion of which should be the default be. Always felt Acropolis Bay might not be the ideal choice for an "ad".

AoE III DE have good examples, the better examples for 0AD.

I mean if people feel that strongly that nothing should ever be removed ok , but then at least moving the bad maps under a separate tag/ folder should be done. It just doesn't make sense to have a wild mix of high quality and mediocre maps. That kind of choice is super confusing and will give new players a bad impression of the game.

I would say they should be rotated, else it becomes too uniform (says the person with entity variety set to "0").

Good assessment of the problem as always. But I don't think this proposal will work. The reason why players boom the way they do is because small rushes aren't effective enough or quick enough. Players can boom women until they make a barrack to make men. If a rush comes at that point they can fend it off with production from the CC/barrack. And if a rush comes before a barrack is up then the rush is so few men that it doesn't do enough damage and can easily be fended off with just a few men being produced from the CC. The difference in men and women training times also make women much more effective since they are both cheaper and quicker produce, so rushes have to kill a lot of women to be effective. I also think this proposal would actually backfire because most players will do the boom and reach late game earlier (because of better women) at which point they can punish players that slowed themselves by rushing. I think a better solution is to make rushing less economically costly, so rushing players aren't so far behind booming players. I think this can be done in three main ways: Increase loot for kills: this will make good rushes much more effective since you will have a better eco because you rushed. It will also punish bad rushes, which is the way it should be. Most importantly, this won't change the incentives for players to make more men early just to fight off rushes (i.e. this means rushes are still possible because players' won't turtle from the start without any penalty). This is my preferred change. Increase men's gather rates and/or decrease women's gathering rates: The change in rates would need to mostly occur with wood. This means that rushers would have a better eco because they had more men than women early. But, as I said above, this will also result in some people making men for the sole purpose of fighting off rushes, which means booming will still equal turtling. Make women and men's training times the same: This will mean women are less effective at booming, so rushing won't be as costly from a unit production time. But again, this will also result in some people making men for the sole purpose of fighting off rushes, which means booming will still equal turtling.

Dedicated workers could possibly have technologies in later phases that boosts their output; that could ensure that they would be more efficient workers in the late game but not make them a go to unit in the early game.

That's my point. Most TGs there will be no action until the 15 minute mark because aggression just isn't viable due to booming being unpunishable as it's effectively the same as turtling. It makes the game quite boring.

Eigentlich macht die Einstellung im Menü kaum einen unterschied, da kannst du es ruhig auf minimum stellen. Ich empfehle im Spiel 60 zu verwenden sofern dein PC dies problemlos ohne große Sch@#$%ungen erziehlen kann. Am besten FPS Anzeige aktivieren und sehen wie flüssig das ganze laufen tut.