fatherbushido Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 Hi! In the past, there was only one kind of reaction on the forum, perhaps was it . It could be confusing to give a like when something sad happens, so I guess it was thought that giving some nuances was better. Now we have 5 choices Thanks Like Haha Sad Confused I often see people receiving the last one, without any comments. I guess that if someone is confused, he could just ask clarifications. Last time I received it, I was really disturbed. I really think that we could only give positive reactions. If something is not of our taste, one can just skip it or discuss about it. Any opinion? 3 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuk0z Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 Mostly agree with @fatherbushido. More specifically the 'Confused' emoticon would be fine if it could display sthg like « Please ask clarifications ». Dunno if that's easily possible, but this way one receiving this reaction without any question wouldn't feel the need to add a post just for asking what is that he should clarify. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 Yes is kind a "cringe" face. I don't liked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nescio Posted January 15, 2020 Report Share Posted January 15, 2020 Why are those things there in the first place? Wouldn't it be better to disable them all? Or at least hide them for everyone except those users who explicitly opt in? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Human emotions are difficult to process for some people. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarcoma Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 add more emotions, like telegram 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatherbushido Posted January 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 37 minutes ago, PhyZik said: Welcome to idiocracy. I am not sure. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatherbushido Posted January 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 12 hours ago, Nescio said: Why are those things there in the first place? Probably it was first to avoid the "+1" kind of thread of the early forum and newsgroup days. Then I don't know, I missed that part of human history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niektb Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 It's indeed much easier to express your opinion on a particular post without having to clutter the topic. But i'm not really the confused face is actually used to express your confusion. I feel its meaning has become something like 'Wut? Why would you say such a thing?' but that might just be me lol 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordGood Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudica Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 (edited) I think that adding a simple dislike icon could prevent all the confusion regarding the confused or sad reactions. Sometimes you read a post so stupid that there isn't really even much to talk about. And it's not exactly making me sad; it's not preferable to let something your read on the Internet affect you happiness after all. I wouldn't say it makes me confused either. Could that be that I didn't understand that post? No, I don't think so. I see exactly what was being said and it's something I didn't like. Just let me express myself briefly and precisely. Edited January 16, 2020 by Boudica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatherbushido Posted January 16, 2020 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Thanks for having taken the time to do a detailed answer @Boudica ;-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 @feneur @implodedok How much control do we have on these emoji? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundiata Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I think we should have more. It helps a lot to not clutter up threads and quickly gauge community response. Red heart button for "love" Blue thumbs up for "like" A thumbs down button theoretically sounds logical, but for psychological reasons, it might not be advised. In theory we shouldn't let online interactions determine our feelings and state of mind, but reality is a different question. I think the "confused" choice is nuanced enough to express something akin to a dislike without being too harsh. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nani Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 (edited) Similar https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T899 Ps: I noticed @Krinkle is on the discussion xd (if the same person) Edited January 16, 2020 by nani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feneur Posted January 17, 2020 Report Share Posted January 17, 2020 On 1/16/2020 at 2:31 PM, Stan` said: @feneur @implodedok How much control do we have on these emoji? 100% In practice I guess the correct answer is less than that since the icons for the existing pre-made ones can be redone (and maybe could be different from theme to theme, not sure), and a future update could change the system, but in general we can use or not use as much or as little as we want of it. As for what to use or not, I don't think I should make the decision, but I want to add my opinion: I personally like the possibility to show that I agree or appreciate something without having to take up unnecessary space or go off-topic. I do think that it should be limited to positive reactions though, for negative reactions to have a positive effect (if all you get is "I dislike this" you are unable to change or explain whatever it was that caused the reaction, so all the reaction would lead to would be to make the receiver sad) they need to be expressed in greater detail (preferably phrased more politely than "I dislike this" as well for that matter), so my preference is to keep it to positive or at the most neutral reactions. All reactions are neutral or positive in terms of how they affect the "reputation" (i.e. the little number next to the plus symbol underneath your user group and avatar), but it's of course up for debate how they affect the one receiving them, so I wouldn't say it has to be the way things are now. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTreePaladin Posted January 18, 2020 Report Share Posted January 18, 2020 I agree with limiting to positive reactions. I think "disliked" content should either be ignored, or require an actual response with an explanation. I don't favor a "downvote" option. I think it has its place to help suppress spam-like content, but I don't think we have nearly enough volume to even remotely need that functionality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.