Silier Posted April 19, 2022 Report Share Posted April 19, 2022 Depends who was hosting. IIRC the host needs to have patched version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcelusmaximus Posted May 1, 2022 Report Share Posted May 1, 2022 On 19/04/2022 at 10:00 AM, seeh said: where did you find this error? i didn't found this in commands.txt and not in metadata.json and not in logs. I guess you found it somewhere in the server logs Game wasn't rated, i thought it was, later of reporting i found out so as i could not delete my past post, i edited Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeh Posted May 12, 2022 Report Share Posted May 12, 2022 can we expect the rating will be calculated later? if I remember correctly (right?) does it sometimes take a day? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted May 31, 2022 Report Share Posted May 31, 2022 @user1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucelee Posted June 2, 2022 Report Share Posted June 2, 2022 So when people submit people leaving game do the victims ever get their points for the win? or a win added to the W ? This has happened to me 4-5 times and I have not had any points awarded. @user1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thephilosopher Posted June 3, 2022 Report Share Posted June 3, 2022 (edited) 18 hours ago, brucelee said: So when people submit people leaving game do the victims ever get their points for the win? or a win added to the W ? This has happened to me 4-5 times and I have not had any points awarded. Yes, both. If you submit your replay and it's verified, you should receive the W and the points shortly afterward. Typically it takes awhile for people to get to your game after you submit the replay (like anywhere from 2-3 weeks to 2-3 months), so it's possible they just haven't gotten to it yet? Edited June 3, 2022 by thephilosopher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse_Harold Posted June 4, 2022 Report Share Posted June 4, 2022 On June 3rd, 2022, around 11:35 pm UTC, Some players were apparently colluding to boost the rating of certain players. These guys, or one guy with a lot of duplicate accounts, were throwing matches rapidly, about 6 matches in 4 minutes at one point. Here are some of the names that I noticed apparently doing this. borg2 borgy2 borg2. fman4 fman3 fman2 aboss valihrant.. borg. carid2 vali2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brucelee Posted June 4, 2022 Report Share Posted June 4, 2022 Its only been a week or so since I made my claims known. I did not know it was hard to look at the game and see when someone left. Its really that simple, but its a free game and fun to play with the "good" people. Waiting patiently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alre Posted June 4, 2022 Report Share Posted June 4, 2022 the queue is several months long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarcoma Posted June 5, 2022 Report Share Posted June 5, 2022 On 03/06/2022 at 10:55 PM, Norse_Harold said: On June 3rd, 2022, around 11:35 pm UTC, Some players were apparently colluding to boost the rating of certain players. Also, @defc0n was leaving lobby, rejoining and changing nick repeatedly 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted June 5, 2022 Report Share Posted June 5, 2022 @user1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1General Posted June 11, 2022 Report Share Posted June 11, 2022 (edited) I confirme this case when i see anothers games today after his game 1x1 with me. Edited June 13, 2022 by 1General Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted August 27, 2022 Report Share Posted August 27, 2022 You can zip it too 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e.v Posted August 29, 2022 Report Share Posted August 29, 2022 On 27/08/2022 at 10:58 AM, Stan` said: You can zip it too Of course! I hadn't even thought about that! How foolish ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitaJenkins Posted September 21, 2022 Report Share Posted September 21, 2022 (edited) Mhm i dont remember quitting i think you quitted alot of more times than i did but this time we played normal and i won :-) I hope you don't mind when i share a platform for MOD APKs & Premium Apps. All is free! Go to mod apk app and enjoy! Edited September 22, 2022 by RitaJenkins note Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse_Harold Posted January 28, 2023 Report Share Posted January 28, 2023 @user1guanajato was throwing rated matches in rapid succession to give cronelius points. [2023-01-28 17:47:34+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1673 -> 1681) and guanajato (1424 -> 1415). [2023-01-28 17:48:22+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1681 -> 1689) and guanajato (1415 -> 1407). [2023-01-28 17:49:22+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1689 -> 1696) and guanajato (1407 -> 1399). [2023-01-28 17:50:12+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1696 -> 1703) and guanajato (1399 -> 1392). [2023-01-28 17:51:57+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1703 -> 1710) and guanajato (1392 -> 1385). [2023-01-28 17:52:24+0000] Basiliskos: @user1 [2023-01-28 17:52:53+0000] Basiliskos: @user1 [2023-01-28 17:54:15+0000] Basiliskos: guanajato giving cronelius free points [2023-01-28 17:54:18+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1710 -> 1716) and guanajato (1385 -> 1378). [2023-01-28 17:55:02+0000] cronelius.: Guanajato is troll [2023-01-28 17:55:10+0000] Basiliskos: stop playing with him so [2023-01-28 17:55:14+0000] Basiliskos: he give u points [2023-01-28 17:55:15+0000] Basiliskos: a lot [2023-01-28 17:55:18+0000] Basiliskos: a lot of matchs There might be additional abuses prior to this, as I had joined the lobby just before the start of this excerpt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossenburg Posted January 28, 2023 Report Share Posted January 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Norse_Harold said: @user1guanajato was throwing rated matches in rapid succession to give cronelius points. [2023-01-28 17:47:34+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1673 -> 1681) and guanajato (1424 -> 1415). [2023-01-28 17:48:22+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1681 -> 1689) and guanajato (1415 -> 1407). [2023-01-28 17:49:22+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1689 -> 1696) and guanajato (1407 -> 1399). [2023-01-28 17:50:12+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1696 -> 1703) and guanajato (1399 -> 1392). [2023-01-28 17:51:57+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1703 -> 1710) and guanajato (1392 -> 1385). [2023-01-28 17:52:24+0000] Basiliskos: @user1 [2023-01-28 17:52:53+0000] Basiliskos: @user1 [2023-01-28 17:54:15+0000] Basiliskos: guanajato giving cronelius free points [2023-01-28 17:54:18+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1710 -> 1716) and guanajato (1385 -> 1378). [2023-01-28 17:55:02+0000] cronelius.: Guanajato is troll [2023-01-28 17:55:10+0000] Basiliskos: stop playing with him so [2023-01-28 17:55:14+0000] Basiliskos: he give u points [2023-01-28 17:55:15+0000] Basiliskos: a lot [2023-01-28 17:55:18+0000] Basiliskos: a lot of matchs There might be additional abuses prior to this, as I had joined the lobby just before the start of this excerpt. Indeed, he does have about 20 multiple accounts. Cronilius, el_gallo_desplamando etc from which he harvest ratings to his main account. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse_Harold Posted January 29, 2023 Report Share Posted January 29, 2023 You mean el_gallo_desplumado and/or el_gallo_desplumaduo ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse_Harold Posted January 30, 2023 Report Share Posted January 30, 2023 More thrown matches to inflate the ratings of el_gallo_desplumaduo and cronelius. [2023-01-30 20:36:21+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1587 -> 1597) and guanajato (1402 -> 1392). [2023-01-30 20:36:49+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1597 -> 1606) and guanajato (1392 -> 1382). [2023-01-30 20:37:16+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1606 -> 1615) and guanajato (1382 -> 1373). [2023-01-30 20:38:18+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1615 -> 1623) and guanajato (1373 -> 1364). [2023-01-30 20:38:41+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1623 -> 1631) and guanajato (1364 -> 1356). [2023-01-30 20:39:01+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1631 -> 1638) and guanajato (1356 -> 1348). [2023-01-30 20:39:23+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1638 -> 1645) and guanajato (1348 -> 1340). [2023-01-30 20:39:48+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1645 -> 1652) and guanajato (1340 -> 1333). [2023-01-30 20:40:10+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1652 -> 1658) and guanajato (1333 -> 1326). [2023-01-30 20:40:54+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1658 -> 1664) and guanajato (1326 -> 1319). [2023-01-30 20:41:14+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1664 -> 1670) and guanajato (1319 -> 1313). [2023-01-30 20:41:38+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1670 -> 1676) and guanajato (1313 -> 1307). [2023-01-30 20:42:46+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1676 -> 1681) and guanajato (1307 -> 1301). [2023-01-30 20:43:07+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. el_gallo_desplumaduo won against guanajato. Rating Adjustment: el_gallo_desplumaduo (1681 -> 1686) and guanajato (1301 -> 1295). [2023-01-30 20:44:25+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1716 -> 1729) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1686 -> 1673). [2023-01-30 20:44:48+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1729 -> 1741) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1673 -> 1661). [2023-01-30 20:45:14+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1741 -> 1753) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1661 -> 1649). [2023-01-30 20:45:43+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1753 -> 1764) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1649 -> 1638). [2023-01-30 20:46:07+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1764 -> 1775) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1638 -> 1627). [2023-01-30 20:46:30+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1775 -> 1785) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1627 -> 1617). [2023-01-30 20:46:50+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1785 -> 1795) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1617 -> 1607). [2023-01-30 20:47:15+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1795 -> 1804) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1607 -> 1597). [2023-01-30 20:47:40+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1804 -> 1813) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1597 -> 1588). [2023-01-30 20:48:02+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1813 -> 1821) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1588 -> 1579). [2023-01-30 20:48:28+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1821 -> 1829) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1579 -> 1571). [2023-01-30 20:48:50+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1829 -> 1836) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1571 -> 1563). [2023-01-30 20:49:36+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1836 -> 1843) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1563 -> 1555). [2023-01-30 20:49:59+0000] Ratings: A rated game has ended. cronelius. won against el_gallo_desplumaduo. Rating Adjustment: cronelius. (1843 -> 1850) and el_gallo_desplumaduo (1555 -> 1548). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceaser2 Posted January 31, 2023 Report Share Posted January 31, 2023 rebello8 left my game less than 1 min in and I think I would of won and would there for like a small rating increase. My name: Caesar2 Offender: rebello8 Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceres Posted February 10, 2023 Report Share Posted February 10, 2023 Hello! I never played online (only on our home network), so am very likely not entitled to suggest something here, but maybe you allow me nevertheless. How about offering players to star well-behaving other players? Those with a good reputation would be preferred gaming partners and others could be simply ignored. Again, please accept my sincere apologies if I wrote nonsense here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lion.Kanzen Posted February 11, 2023 Report Share Posted February 11, 2023 On 10/02/2023 at 9:45 AM, Ceres said: How about offering players to star well-behaving other players? Those with a good reputation would be preferred gaming partners and others could be simply ignored. They parents have educated them better. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yekaterina Posted February 18, 2023 Report Share Posted February 18, 2023 @Norse_Harold I recommend you ignore him, because he just likes earning rating points, perhaps just to convince hosts to let him play, which is sad as many new players are prevented from playing in TGs. Now he is obviously a smurf and just getting some approval, so just let him be. He will stop when his rating reaches his estimated. If you don't like him just don't let him join your games but I've played with this dude before and he was a nice person and a strong teammate, only slight imperfection was he couldn't understand English well. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norse_Harold Posted February 19, 2023 Report Share Posted February 19, 2023 (edited) 22 hours ago, Yekaterina said: I recommend you ignore him, because he just likes earning rating points I'm not going to ignore flagrant rule violations. See lobby rules 7 and 8 7. Not attempt to artificially adjust any user of the service's rating or any of the statistics which impact it. (Examples of this are, but are not limited to: cheating in ranked games, reverse engineering the service, and taking advantage of other users of the service. 8. Not undermine the intended gameplay or purposefully gain unfair advantages in multiplayer matches (for example cheating, using exploits or bugs). When cronelius setup ranked matches between two users that he controlled that was gaining an unfair advantage in multiplayer by rigging the matches. It was also an artificial adjustment of his rating. There are good reasons for the rules. They help to protect the integrity of ranked matches. They also help to quickly identify the minimum age of an account based on the number of ranked matches. Many or most players are not online at the time of the rigged ranked matches, so they don't have an awareness of what's happening in order to identify that some ranked matches were rigged! And, how can you expect players to know this when you're asking me to not even post in this thread with the evidence? Integrity of statistics about the number of (legitimate) ranked matches is important for more than just gauging player skill. It also helps to identify which users have invested more in their accounts than other users. This is useful for identifying main accounts of players and linking player reputation to those names. Please do not ignore players that are boosting their ratings and number of ranked matches by playing rigged games. Please report them as soon as possible. See something, say something. Thank you. Edited February 19, 2023 by Norse_Harold 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yekaterina Posted February 19, 2023 Report Share Posted February 19, 2023 @Norse_Harold First of all, I think the purpose of 0ad as a computer game is to entertain it's players who are willing to spend their precious time on it. As long as he is enjoying it and is not harming anyone else, he deserves his freedom. I argue that he is not affecting anyone else in doing that, because no one else lost or gained any ratings at all. So you should just play your own game and enjoy yourself instead of wasting your own time on him. I have some questions about your post: Wouldn't your rule 7 suggest that any ranked match can be an artificial adjustment of the rating system? Any rating change can be argued to be artificial. For example, if I play with someone whom I know to be weaker than me just to farm ratings from him, is that a violation? What would you say about custom rating mod? What is the issue with changing their rating? I can cover up my rating with that mod, but most OPs know me so it's not a problem at all. Similarly we all know about Cornelius, he is a valuable player of rating 1800, capable of fast boom and crossbow push with the Hans. Whatever he does with the ratings will not affect our knowledge of him, and hence will not give him an advantage. You talk about rigging the matches. He is playing with himself, so the settings are very much whatever he wants, just like playing against AI. He is not cheating in a game against anyone else. If you want some ratings, just go do the same yourself! But we all know you are approximately 1300 and I would never stop you or treat you differenly if I see you change your number to 1500 or 900 or just some stars. Neither you nor him cannot gain an unfair advantage by having higher or lower ratings if we all know how you play. The players who can think of this idea and execute it are no noobs, so it's obvious that they are a smurf and we will take it into consideration when balancing TG. Finally, it's just a game. Give it a rest and let people have the freedom to enjoy themselves. Don't turn the lobby into an exam hall or a Fascist country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.