Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 2022-10-08 in all areas

  1. The second edition of 0 A.D. Friendly Tournament Series has started! Here is the list of players: ValihrAnt (2345) Feldfeld (2201) borg- (2169) weirdJokes (1913) Edwarf (1861) LetswaveaBook (1815) Dakara (1778) PhiliptheSwaggerless (1642) 011235813 (1598) MarcAurel (1547) alre (1500) chocapoca (1493) seeh (1150) Bete (1108) ________________________________ Round 5 matches: @Feldfeld vs @Dakara @ValihrAnt vs @Player of 0AD @Edwarf vs @MarcusAureliu#s @Philip the Swaggerless vs @BeTe @rm -rf vs @LetswaveaBook @chocapoca vs @seeh Bye (no game for this round, +1 point): @alre The deadline for this round is Friday 16, 23:59 UTC. Please try to organize your match as soon as possible using forum private messaging! Beware of timezone differences. Please message me personally if your opponent doesn't answer you after 2-3 days. Brackets: https://challonge.com/sv36zmko ________________________________________________ Game settings: Tournament announcement message: First edition:
    2 points
  2. https://youtu.be/qEPRrRAkJDA do you like it?
    2 points
  3. This game reminds me of when I played Command & Conquer fifteen years ago.
    2 points
  4. I wrote up "Steps to reproduce" and "Workaround" instructions in the bug report here.
    2 points
  5. Dear all, thrilled by the new Alpha 0.26 - great job folks! Though - a little user interface inconvenience: 1 - when selecting a new mod from mod.io via the 0AD mods download menu, it is not possible to see simultaneously which mods version is already installed and which mod version is available for download (I know this is a luxury issue and the new nodal window cannot be moved, unfortunately, unless there is major redesign of the user interface mechanics). I you move the overlapping modal window borders a little bit, the existing mod versions could be seen and compared to those aversions available for download. 2 - sometimes new mods versions are not replacing older ones but are added as new mods. Wouldn't it be nice to have a button allowing to remove (delete) the installed instance of an existing mod? (kind of a clean-up process) ( I do know you could manually remove them from the directories but uI would prefer doing that from within the game) Thanks for your consideration! Best regards, Grautvornix
    1 point
  6. I didn't know buildings were so good.
    1 point
  7. yes, if I understand things correctly. I am also new to gitlab.
    1 point
  8. @real_tabasco_sauce ty. I guess I need to learn more about gitlab interface. Then I should only care about of changes listed on this page? https://gitlab.com/0ad/0ad-community-mod-a26/-/commits/main
    1 point
  9. oh i see, @guerringuerrin, this is in the siege-acceleration-change branch, but not in the 0.26.2 branch. So basically it is being worked on, but not yet included in a release. I double checked by applying the 0.26.2 version in 0ad and comparing stats before and after.
    1 point
  10. @guerringuerrin The first gameplay changes were just fixing the han fields. I would guess we would gradually introduce more comprehensive changes to see what can be accomplished with the mod. For example, @LetswaveaBook's idea about house women training is not a drastic overhaul so I think it would be an easy next step for the mod. Adding gameplay features quickly can still leave time for people to comment on them so long as they dont interfere with each other. For example, the sparta overhaul followed by a cavalry rework can be tested and evaluated independently in the same mod. But we should certainly leave time for players to evaluate and play new features before we add ones that are dependent on those earlier additions. I don't think we should be afraid to add gameplay elements that we are not 100% sure are improvements, because getting player feedback is essential to improving the game, and the mod can be changed and updated semi-continuously. We should look into ways to ensure only the most recent version of the mod is playable, because players could have the tendency to settle on the older version and not care to try anything new, which is what the mod is all about (as I understand it).
    1 point
  11. ChronA and I warned wraitii and others about these issues when the community-mod was first announced. wraitii doesn't seem to know how the community managed to get a significant number of players using community-mod. Important team game hosters hosted popular games with it. valihrAnt hosted games with it. That was a good idea, but a time sink for valihrAnt. And, the changes were simple and important enough for people to voluntarily install it. If you don't keep the changes simple and important enough, and ideally infrequent enough, then the player base will not cooperate. How do you herd cats? You don't. You find out what they want, provide that, and then they voluntarily go to it. Alternatively, I would suggest creating a separate mod called official-bugfixes. That one most people will probably use. And, community-mod can be kept for (minimal) gameplay balancing.
    1 point
  12. It's done now, if you Have 0.26.2 it should work out.
    1 point
  13. You need to assign a hotkey. Since I haven't done that I could only guess what then.
    1 point
  14. Maybe "Themistoclean Walls." https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Themistoclean_Wall
    1 point
  15. - In game name: Edwarf - Interested for the following schedules: weekly or lighning - BO1 or BO3?: BO1 pref for fast game and ofc bo3 for final (not for me ofc :p )
    1 point
  16. Seleucids in 0ad was mentionned on a website about Seleucids in games... Maybe we should remember the author that he can contributes too ?
    1 point
  17. Feldmap is now available on mod.io for ease of access.
    1 point
  18. I announce that the tournament will start next week! It will use a weekly schedule, and have a BO1 format. I did not decide yet if it will use seeded or random brackets as I did not gather enough opinions. Feel free to give your opinion if you registered! Registrations are still open, and will be until Sunday 9 October 20:00 UTC, and I will announce the brackets before Sunday 22:00 UTC. Once they are announced, you will know who is your opponent, and you will have 1 week to play your match. I strongly encourage you to use the forum private message feature to schedule your match. If you meet your opponent in lobby, you can of course play your match on the spot, but please do not count on it! This is not guaranteed to happen. Even if you registered, it is not guarranteed you will get to play the tournament. It depends of if the number of players registered fit well. Here is how I intend to complete the brackets: There will be a Gold Bracket that will contain up to 8 players. If more than 8 players registered, then having a Silver Bracket is a likely possibility. If we have around 16 players registered, then there will be a 8-player Silver Bracket for sure. If we have 12 players registered overall, then I will message the 4 players that didn't make it to the Gold if they are interested in playing a 4-player mini bracket. If you missed the registration deadline, do not forget that I intend to organize more tournaments like this if it goes well. So if there are no problem, then next tournament will be in around 1 month. ________________________________________________ I registered the players that announced being available with the weekly schedule. If you can't play this edition of the tournament, please tell me and I'll unregister you. Currently registered (10 players): @Feldfeld@ValihrAnt @Philip the Swaggerless@Stockfish@thephilosopher@seeh@Dakara@kun0@Edwarf@BeTe Waiting for confirmation: @Emperiorplease tell me if this schedule is good for you. Xpert told me in lobby his intent to participate. Please post in this thread to confirm.
    1 point
  19. Oh thanks! Such an amazing reward
    1 point
  20. Is it acceptable to try hard to explain why one should not try hard? Or, would that also be trying hard? Then if we can't try hard in explaining why we shouldn't try hard then does that mean that the tryhards have already won?
    1 point
  21. Fauna maya finalizada ; Iconos; -Las foto no está en español porque quiero que sea más internacional, Lista; 1. jaguarundi 2. howler monkey 3. spider monkey 4. otter 5. Tepezcuintle 6. opossum- 7. iguana 8. jaguar 9. black panther 10. virginia deer 11. Pecarí 12. giant anteater 13. boa constrictor 14. ocelote 15. Cougar 16. margay 17. raccoon 18. coati 19. Mexican tamandua (anteater) 20. Tapetí 21.Coyote 22. greater grison 23. Hooded skunk 24. Hammerhead Shark 25. Sardá shark 26. killer whale 27. Cojolite 28. .White-bellied Chachalaca 29.Caimán. 30. .Paujil 31. .Timanú 32. .mazama temama 33. .Yuuk/Mazama pandora 34. .gray fox 35. .Mexican gray squirrel 36. .Dolphin 37. .nose crocodile 38. .morelet crocodile 39. .Basilisk / striped toloque 40. .giant toad 41.Xoloitzcuintle -¿Sugerencias , críticas etc...? Disculpen las molestias*
    1 point
  22. More like an "Elé-hexadecapede". In other news, here's an Athenian phalanx for my new profile banner(s): What is interesting is that every member in the formation wears a bronze cuirass, filtering out the others with the linothorax.
    1 point
  23. The biggest problem of balancing is that everyone says that the team needs to change this and that. It is like waiting for the bus to arrive while not realizing that you are the bus driver of your own life. Very little people actually realize that everyone has the power to do so. I think that attitude needs to change and this proposal can help with that.
    1 point
  24. ¿Podría por favor eliminar a los sacerdotes, magos, sacerdotisas y altares reverenciales? En general, todo lo que tiene contenido oculto, porque eso es una maldición. Aprecio este juego tanto como mis hermanos, si no fuera demasiado problema, podrían cambiarlos por médicos o algo así. Dios tendrá misericordia de ti y estoy seguro de que permitirá que el juego se vuelva más popular. Pero buscad primero el reino de Dios y su justicia, y todas estas cosas os serán añadidas (Mateo 6:33). Si haces lo necesario para que el juego no sea malo a los ojos del Creador, pero buscas complacerlo haciendo los cambios necesarios, estarás buscando la aprobación del Todopoderoso (estarás buscando el reino de Dios), y Dios promete que el resto que él pone (el resto vendrá), tal vez con la popularidad del juego, o tal vez haciendo que el juego genere más ingresos para usted, o tal vez sanará a sus parientes enfermos, pero lo que sí sé es que Jehová guardará su palabra y les dará lo que necesitan (por su infinita misericordia).
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...