Gurken Khan

@Lion.KanzenOn second thought I guess either a pic of the ~input or the ~output would be ok, but maybe the dark stuff makes for better contrast in icon size if you wanted to go with the hands.

Babylon's Fall would be happy to have the player numbers of BS2024. ^^

Look / search for something like pyrogenisis.exe on your machine and run it. Maybe look here for hints: https://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/GameDataPaths If you would state your OS ppl would be able to help you more specifically.

That doesn't look like compost to me. Maybe more like this:

I hardly find the error messages helpful, but yours is a new level of unhelpful. Can you upload the crashlog.txt and crashlog.dmp files? (You may find paths to these files at https://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/GameDataPaths )

These concepts seem fine to me, don't think I'd vote for the flags or monument options.

Sheeesh. THE BUG IS REPORTED. Why do you always have to bug the devs?

Well, 'Stone of Galvestion' is correct English, no?

Don't know which translation you mean, the one from @Lion.Kanzen or mine? Translation of pedra de cal still gets me limestone.

The google translation of the video description said limestone, which corroborates my initial guess. Also I couldn't make out a lime (fruit) in the vid.

I accidentally deleted units, it taught me to pay attention to those actions. If you know about the risks and still refuse to double check I can't really relate to that. You didn't read the message, just clicked it away blindly. (But there are other hints.) Shouldn't exist? Kb/mouse? There have been discussions about extra warnings, for example when there are a lot of units to be deleted, but they have led to nothing. I suspect it wouldn't help ppl who want to blindly click away anything as quickly as possible anyway.

@Dizaka Those are your expectations, not mine; don't know how widely your view is shared. I don't see the 'forcing' if you don't watch what you're doing. Of course I wouldn't mind extra options for captured buildings as long as it doesn't negatively impact my play style, so good luck with that!

Yeah, total 0AD ripoff! I see some similar ideas to what we have in the game, some we've been discussing for years, some we have dropped. I don't know how unique they've been anyway and I don't think the similarity is too striking.

This is in response to this: I don't see how it is a balancing issue. Since it is in the balancing section I can't answer there which I want to regardless. So frankly, with all due respect and maybe slightly irritated by the circumstances, I say: bull. 'Captured enemy houses' are your own houses. If you doubleclick on some of your own stuff you select all of that kind. You can't 'delete enemy houses'. If you select all of your houses and delete them, tough luck; better pay attention next time what you're deleting. Those are very basic principles and I hope everyone has the mental capabilities to remember those for three months or longer.

That you should've linked the vid you're talking about.

@leopard @Stan` @user1 I don't even know what the MOTD might be but I hope it's not pointing to this specific thread...

I found the thread puzzling before, but it gets even weirder. But I totally understand that you don't want to mess with obscure thunder magic by @user1.

I don't know what the lobby's MOTD says, but if you have a rating dispute and want to report it you should go here: https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/67875-ratings-disputes-and-offence-reporting/ The first post will tell you what to do. @Stan`I don't see the value of this thread; maybe lock it?

Players shan't be able to set enemies' buildings on fire but should have to do so with their own?

'Realism' as in historically correct?

Obviously didn't read the thread.

If the command is available there's also an icon appearing: I tend to not use the command as I usually have mixed results; sometimes the units simply forgot what they were doing. It's also not working if I unloaded my units at a dropsite which I like to do.

This seems contradictory to me.

Yeah, well I'm no historian, but what I get is that without Seleucus I we wouldn't have the Seleucids to begin with, and while Antiochus III was able to restore some, it kinda went downhill under Antiochus IV. So the connection with the available heroes to CCs doesn't seem too compelling to me.

I don't see the connection to the hero, but the total obscurity is what I really don't like. (I've actually been wondering for years why the CC button is greyed out and becomes available at some point. Even if we were to assume I wasn't the brightest candle on the cake, I don't think we should have mechanics that much in the dark.) I think the MCs are already a strong bonus to the civs that have them, so I'd say please make it more explicit, but I don't think additional bonii are necessary. What could be reconsidered imho is the tie to the hero, which also means CCs aren't available until some time into p3.