Jump to content

LordGood

0 A.D. Department Leader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2.762

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    207

 Content Type 

Everything posted by LordGood

  1. LordGood
    Alright, few things I've noticed so far; you want the origin point to be at the feet and you want the t-pose skeleton to be assigned to the mesh, also the skeleton armature should be named, that will be your skeleton identifier. If all of your skeletons are named 'armature' the engine cant pick out your specific skeleton file. You seem to have also accidentally included the sun and camera in your charging animation file, this violates the 'multiple objects' rule on importing stuff into pyrogenesis. On export you just want to select the mesh and skeleton and check the 'export selection only' box, or make sure those are the only two things in the scene also you DO have a blank material attached. pyrogenesis cant load materials that way so that will also fail the import the T-pose origin being in the middle wont necessarily fail the import, your knight will just be halfway stuck in the ground lol
  2. LordGood
    Have your skeleton file for the hyrule knight?
  3. LordGood
    The engine can't support multiple objects, loose polygons, materials, or AO maps on animated meshes. Also the only animations supported by the engine seem to be location and rotation modifiers attached to the skeleton. Also the animated skeleton NEEDS to have a model attached for the animation to load for some odd reason made new animated meshes myself, super annoying I know
  4. LordGood
    getting your skeleton generator will be a big step in modding this game, even my gate and pony models. One of the most annoying aspects of creating animated props is manually writing skeletons in. I'm thinking we could see some really nice flags, for one
  5. LordGood
    Ptolemies already have mercenary swordsmen and spearmen, mahouts shouldn't be much more than a prop switch
  6. LordGood
    @wowgetoffyourcellphone Could you drop those color corrected ptolemaic textures in the thread?
  7. LordGood
    its got AO in the screenie silly
  8. LordGood
    @Sundiata Square CC fits the footprint quite nicely, actually. Hopefully its lacks the defensive features to out it as a 'fortress'. I plan on using a whole lotta rough stone for that building anyway.
  9. LordGood
    glad we didn't go the stab-fire route/ though to be honest, it would be a lot easier than what I proposed
  10. LordGood
    right on the money, lion
  11. LordGood
    Archaic architecture is a tad extreme, the border between archaic and early classical will still have those heavy solid doric columns but less... sausagey...
  12. LordGood
    Unless you can find us some examples otherwise. I'm not sure I'm understanding you entirely. Do you mean you want to exclude all mention pagan temples and religion because they're not compatible with Abrahamic faiths? Because if that's the case, absolutely not.
  13. LordGood
    I was thinking the Spartan's architecture could stray closer to early classical and use a warmer color stone
  14. LordGood
    I remember reading that Thebes did have an old cyclopean citadel. Not literally built by cyclops, just the style of masonry popular in the bronze age consisting of those massive rough stones
  15. LordGood
    That is a Roman temple, careful with those pseudoperipteral columns, they are a dead giveaway of Roman architecture, rather than Greek
  16. LordGood
    https://trac.wildfiregames.com/browser#art_source https://trac.wildfiregames.com/browser#ps/trunk/binaries/data/mods/public/art/meshes
  17. LordGood
    The short answer is no for vanilla 0 A.D., Empires Ascendant. The modding community is quite strong though, which is what the previous comments are eluding to.
  18. LordGood
    3 very hard AI
  19. LordGood
    I never did play with the Chinese textures, were there any prominent candidates for a Han wonder?
  20. LordGood
    Perhaps you ought to wait for the Han's completion first, That would prevent a messy union that requires more maintenance than is necessary.
  21. LordGood
    Apparently you've never seen me play! hahaha
  22. LordGood
    looks like Cape Cod! haha
  23. LordGood
    We don't have the capability for one unit to have two attacks. I experimented with friendly fire in Ponies Ascendant, it only solidified infantry into a stand-by support role, though it did encourage smarter placement of ranged units, especially slingers. Slingers couldnt hit the broad side of a barn.
  24. LordGood
    We already have a ball court, no entity, just the actor
  25. LordGood
    While danny's idea does sound interesting, that's going to take a back-breaking amount of artwork for all of those building variations. A good first step I would think to take would be splitting the barracks into three buildings, which of course brings us closer to an AOE clone, but allows for that decision making that makes for interesting strategies.
×
×
  • Create New...