Lion.Kanzen

It is supposed to be historically correct but NSFW.

One idea would be to doThe archers (especially inexperienced) have very poor accuracy and miss a lot except when it is a large group of archers, that more than one of them is going to have to hit many targets, especially a large column of marching infantry.

Opinions ?

could not find the post where you taught them for the first time, I mean gladiators

But in any case it would be the complete unit, Or at least one of the variants of this unit that brings that little bug. Because some all icons are screenshots of the unit of the unit with certain background effects. Because the unit heads are designed separately or separately from the body. Maybe @wackyserious you can take a look at this problem and where they are most noticeable is with some spartan unit.

2 alternativas para fase de aldea y ciudad. Con cada uno , al menos con el romano. Está planeado para aparecer aldea, evolucionar a otro en la fase 2 y así mismo la fase 3. 3- busco bocetos para inspirar. 4- son una tarea que se ha contemplado para el juego.

Yes it is complicated but more or less the concept of is trade with imaginary allies. my idea was to mix AoE III, Rise of Nations and Classic city builders from impression games. Then you would have to have a rare resource which could be diamonds or gems, some stone or something rare. https://riseofnations.fandom.com/wiki/Rare_Resources And you captured them with the merchant. And then I would trade it for money

there's no way they miss the shots? It is assumed that at a greater distance they should fail them more.

90%-95% como lo imaginaba ...ya te daré las correcciones mínimas.

Don't forget to check out the statistics of the civilization units to improve the balance.

Si las terminas podríamos incluirlos en, Terra Magna.

tenés que seguir ciertos patrones en cuanto a los a las formas porque una cosa es diseñarlos para él para el juego y en la vida real sería muy indistinguible sin decirte que no sabríamos a ciencia cierta cómo eran. Nosotros lo que hacemos la misma técnica que usan en Age of Empires como si fueran bloques de juegos de construcción.

It is good to have people who know a lot about the civilizations that we are sometimes trying to represent, suggestions like these are welcome and allow us to delve a little deeper into said civilizations and have a clearer approach, I hope you can continue helping us by providing much more material to be able more or less to discern a little more these factions that are difficult for us since it is a very turbulent and dark period of universal history, I hope more of your suggestions, thank you very much.

Thank you for your kind words I wish you have a good day.

in the first place his religious questions are far apart from the subjects he touches on. If you ask me what you are trying to tell me, I would answer that you are telling me fallacies, because you are saying that, if someone has a religious belief,It does not mean that you cannot give your opinion in terms of history, Second what he is telling us and very basic. you are also questioning those sources. Third, science is not a dogma, science is open to question, it is not a religious belief. for example, I do not believe in climate change because obviously you can see that you are a scam that changes it as the predictions fail. If you are going to discredit someone because of a matter of personal opinion that I tell you that you are very bad of you because he himself spoke very badly of my country and I do not get angry because I know that it is the truth, Because I prefer to be treated in a bad way by my culture, than to be treated with nice words and do things to me that are not the truth. I have been able to verify that many things he says about Spain are true, Your country is on a path that Venezuela has already traveled, that Argentina is traveling and that many countries are going to travel. Fifth this, that everything they say about Spain is true, they are an international joke. I can give you all the examples from different sources of what I am saying. I have an I have an academic, university training that allowed me to specialize in communication for advertising, always I consult more than 3 sources. Darwinian theory has a consensus. Which means that not everyone agreed when it came to consensus. Very different from eg. Newton's theory which is easily probable or observation. If you question my positions, I will end up questioning your. We are talking about non-natural social sciences. I advise you that your prejudices do not close your mind.

Brings back many memories that kind of tutorials.

This means that you are going to play on your own terms as you would always play with a normal map? It means that the scenarios are going to be flexible and sandbox mode, and not to follow a rigid, limited and punctual system. It sounds fun if we do it on our own terms, that is, the ability of the player to explore the game for the first time.

There is a functionality that I want to create for 0 ad. It is a feature that comes from the Caesar series. I like the trading system with cities that are not in the map area. But to program this feature, it is necessary to program quite a new extra interface, that is, an extra international trade screen. The idea is commercial with other neighboring cities on the map, for example, the one I am showing you above, you come exotic as well as certain goods,resources that your city has plenty to spare. What I imagine to do is to be able to trade slaves with mercenaries and simply even create exotic resources something that was also one of the features of Rise of Nations.

thanks to your efforts Alexander. It would be nice to add some little ornament on the chest, not just the gorgon.

@Palaxin This could be interesting for you.

I wish there were reforms like there were with the Seleucids with these.

Pyrrus is nothing like to his statue.