Dakara

fun and difference civ

Can't wait to try the first version !

1- For me, we need to absoluty change the concept of mercenaries. They can't recolt, i'm totaly agree for this point. About the cost i want have big cost like 100 for infantery and 150 for cavalery. All mercenary is rank 2 recruitment is instant, the units are not formed, we pay for their service. Limit the number of mercenary by 50 for each player (sound good or not?) One tech for recruit mercenary rank 3 in phase 3 in castle or CC. Like 500 FOOD and 500 METAL cost tech. I would also appreciate that the initial mines be less loaded in resources (5000-> 2000) so that the eco is more relocated and risky, but that's another subject but it can nerve the mercenaries a little. 2- It it true that it is frustating and make good advatnage. But i think we see that like a bonus of civ (only 2 civ have this advantage so it ok), maybe we need more balance all champions. Some seem too weak or situational. Take care to don't starndardizes all civilisations. 3- I think nop, if you look point 2. Ptol and Sélucid have good bonus with production heroe in CC. So it make a malus effect to balance the advantage of the point 2. 4 - Noboby forces the infantry to serve only as anti ram. i find the current situation satisfied. No easily accessible sword infantery that'is ok. It is charming to know that the Macedonians have this weakness.

i hate counter unit

i do it everygame without mod :p intestring in option

Yeah u right test it the best idea. I don't think a people spam this unit in P1 can win because no military tech in P1 for example Can be good but not op , lets start

Nerf mercenary cav, up to 120 metal by unit and train instant after nerf the first mine metal and stone to 1000 ressource instead 5000

delete skirmish useless unit

♥

Nice idea ! Nice idea, Provided archers are not buffed in a later update. It mean spearman will be better against shield unit ? I'm agree. I'm favorable When buildind is built, it a passive income of food? Great idea but i ferar persians will be op combine with the current population bonus? Maybe delete the bonus population for persians? I also agree to remove superfluous tech for the Persians knowing that they can play cavalry earlier with the previous changes. For the idea of gold for much faster unit i don't have opinion. Why not create a category of slave fighter in market? like dogs of britons is limited amount of unit like 40? cost only metal and train very fast, a little weak unit (less strong than citizen unit); We can imagine 4 units of slaves ; 1 unit with mass, 1 unit with little bow (attack fast and middle range like slingers), 1 spearman (with normal stat compare to sperman persians, better for kill ram) 1 scout skirmish cavalery no armor and medium attack . Just for say, Perses have already better ram, immortel unit, large choices of cavalery. Also persians have tech for builidng is more HP. Maybe we have to change bonus team. Maybe we can add the tech disparo is instant when click

sh_it = ban word

Hello, Interesting, thank for the transparency How to spend part of this sum well?

fight with formation is a bit boring bcs you can target unit , it disable formation

Absoluty @#$% building ! don't be age of empire like please Only stable for persias like old alpha

it good already

I suggest a badge given by user1 for people leaving ranked games lol

i don't have the problem in 2 vs 2 with 200 pop max each

Hello, I appreciate your ideas for boosting the fortress but I think we can do more than just move production back from champions to castles. Yes in the most of game fortress are not building cuz not needed. I really think is useful to had Yes im most of game fortress is boring. I really think this building have to be useful and defensive building. Better make changes on fortress for less annoying instead just producing building. At the moment, i like the tech in barack and stables for make champ (compare to old alpha where some civ can champ on barack and orther civ need fortress, it was no fair) so i don"t want champ in fortress. People like spam champ in barack/stable; let them do it. How improve utility ? 1-We can up garnison by 20 so it is total of 40 spots garnison 2-Capacity of 3 siege engines on the top of fortress. Siege engine put on fortress can't move but player can select the target. He is not a random attack. Ennemy team can attack only the siege if he want, it separate of the buidling. Siege are just deploy on fortress. So range = normal range of siege + bonus of where the castle is built). For example archer on wall stone can be killed without attack the wall. Also don't forget fortress have role in the area of player (fortress keep zone right if centre civid is destroyed?) 3 -Then we can imagine an orther idea with a tech. An free income of unit military, for exemple every 60 seconde you gain 6 units (u choose with a button beetwen distance, sword or piques)

Why not a mod, to make the games more strategic and longer. A little more sandbox level reflection.

You sould say why, please

use command for mute and stop whine

Fortunately, unlike age of empire, you can't see the scores of your opponents in part, so there is no impact in having a bad scoring system. But how to improve it? Sometimes killing units doesn't win the game, so don't spend your resources either, so good... But having a system allows you to compare yourself and as you do it well, you know how to compare players with all the criteria and not only the overall score.

For, optional in the game settings

stop worrying, just play. the forum is getting toxic lol