Genava55

Slinger much stronger against units without shields (archers, slingers etc.)? Javelin much stronger against unit with shield (infantry, cavalry)? Archer stronger against both but less than slingers and javelineers respectively?

@Ultimate Aurelian

The Gallic Wars, Book 5, Ch. 43: On the seventh day of the attack, a very high wind having sprung up, they began to discharge by their slings hot balls made of burned or hardened clay, and heated javelins, upon the huts, which, after the Gallic custom, were thatched with straw. These quickly took fire, and by the violence of the wind, scattered their flames in every part of the camp. By the way about the range: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sling_(weapon)#Today

Highly skilled slingers like those from Rhodes and the Balneares used metallic projectile. And indeed, stone cost is not really justified even for the regular ones. Historically, Rhodian slingers have been used to counter Persian archers. See Xenophon in Anabasis 111.3. 7 to 20.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opfermoor_Vogtei https://www.weltbild.de/artikel/kalender/opfermoor-vogtei-am-mittelpunkt-deutschlands-wandkalender_24502306-1 https://www.biologie-seite.de/Biologie/Anthropomorphe_Pfahlgötter

In Fellbach-Schmiden, Germany, some kind of wooden reliefs or statues have been found https://bawue.museum-digital.de/index.php?t=objekt&oges=99 https://bawue.museum-digital.de/index.php?t=objekt&oges=575&cachesLoaded=true Some reconstructions have been proposed: One of them could represent Cernunnos. It isn't impossible it had horns as well. It's nitpicking, it is not important if you have more urgent stuff to do.

With the Celts it is a bit more complicated. For example the two statues found in Switzerland, at Yverdon-les-Bains and Genève (Geneva) has been found outdoor. The former outside the rampart, the latter close to the lake shore. There were probably statues in sanctuaries, but we know there were statues outside as well. Because of a particular feature (see following). Not at all. It is further complicated because the ancestor cult at this time is much more active in Celtic and Germanic societies than it is in Roman and Greek ones. In addition, we call it sanctuary but it is actually closer to the Greek concept of temenos, which could have various function. We do not know if this building and area were dedicated to one or several gods or to an ancestor or if the religious function was kinda secondary. Isn't this wooden statue already planned for the Gallic temple? Simply asking. About the wonder, if you switch, I am fine with that.

Not that uncommon to portray such big maces, especially for cavalrymen, in the later eras (upper left): Although it is probably an officer and ceremonial type of mace. It is also depicted in religious interpretation of historical events in Mughal India:

I assure you it is far too heavy for anything. Even to cut wood. Even a medieval two-handed war hammer doesn't reach 5 kilograms. Nope. Axes are rarely used on the battlefield since the beginning of the iron age. Maybe the Germans could have thrown wooden staffs and axes but there are no conclusive evidence before the Franks and their francisca. However, the francisca is used like the Roman pilum. Dedicated units throwing axes continuously never existed.

Quite impractical.

Slightly outside the period but interesting https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/two-rare-swords-found-6th-century-underground-tunnel-tomb-japan-006879 https://decouvertes-archeologiques.blogspot.com/2017/02/la-plus-longue-epee-de-lancien-japon.html?fbclid=IwAR2annmyLp-HF_fzo-Lux4M3W3KMQgubwHVhEyvBxAr2EfO75OHuFjexrBU

Nobody knows how and when the Celtic languages splited. This is a very strong debate in linguistic notably between the models of Karl Horst Schmidt and Kim McCone. Yes! The difference is that the first video is 100% based on non-existent material while the second is based on existent material, real written record in Gaulish. The Common Brittonic video is based on linguistic reconstruction from an amateur. Those texts do not exist in the historical records. It depends on the hypothesis and the model of the person carrying out the reconstruction. It is in your mind. You are comparing Gaulish written during the Gallo-Roman period with a non-existent reconstruction of Brittonic. I am not a linguist, so I rely on the opinion of expert. In the case of Delamarre, he clearly states on the first page of his dictionary that he considers the Celtic language spoken in Southern Britain during the Late Iron Age (100 BC - AD 100) as only a variant of the language spoken in the continent.

At this time the Brittonic/Brythonic languages are very little different to the Continental Celtic or Gaulish. It is mostly a matter of stress accent. Remember that Old Irish, Old Welsh and Old Breton are Medieval languages. The language spoke by the Britons is labeled as Common Brittonic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Brittonic As noted by Tacitus: So personally I see no issue to use Gaulish for both factions. From the toponyms and the ethnonyms, I see little difference as well with Gaulish. Iberian language is probably non-indo-european as well. Sadly Iberian is not understandable, we do not know enough the vocabulary and the structure of the language. Furthermore we have no sister language to do a comparison. There is a theory that Basque has some links with the Iberian language, so it is the best we can use at the moment: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vascoiberismo

Aristocrat burial in Musov https://www2.rgzm.de/Transformation/Czech/Musov/29012007.htm https://www.outfit4events.com/eur/product/9999-german-spear-from-the-king-s-grave-of-musov/

Only Roman or Celtic coins, they didn't mint anything themselves at this time. See those:

I use this dictionary from Delamarre, French is my mother tongue. Those are the latinized version. And brogae is actually what you can see in Allobroges, I don't think it means "field" but "land", "country" or even "territory". The Gallic dictionaries generally analyzes Galatian, Lepotian and Gallic as a whole. Sometimes including Brittonic languages. I will answer further later.

Sadly no. Nothing more than the usual simple patterns we already posted in the other thread and sent by private message. There is little known about the Early Germans, especially on their artistic preferences. Some other reenactment stuff:

I like it. I would say I find a bit weird the upper part of the inner houses with the wicker still visible, without cover wattle-and-daube is pretty useless. Maybe it could be an opportunity to add player color on the upper part (or the lower part) of the house as well. The contrast between white and colored can be appealing. This is a place of gathering and feasting, an occasion for Gallic aristocrats and elected magistrates (there were elected positions in the Gallic society) to display their wealth in the purpose to get more support (politically, economically and military). We know these particular events were the opportunity to drink wine and indeed there are a lot of amphora remains found in the sanctuary of Corent. Even holes in the ground where wine was poured in, probably as a symbolic ritual to share it with the underground deities. Finally we found another striking feature on the site, coins and tools to produce coins. Maybe the coins were distributed to the guests. I am simply saying these things to give you idea if you want to add more little things. http://www.luern.fr/index.php?mod=scientifique&act=sanctuaire&id=47&img=32

Interesting ideas

To be precise, we don't know if this was a statue. The only thing sure, there was some kind of a weapon trophee (tropaion): https://www.academia.edu/17354860/Le_trophée_de_Corent From the objects found (4 shields bosses, a scabbard, a chain mail and a Gallic boar standard), it was probably not a statue. To give you an idea in a different context: https://youtu.be/GczRbefa16k?t=755 It seems that wicker is more correct according to the description from the site. This is like half-timbered construction (à colombage en français). Wooden poles with wicker frames. http://luern.free.fr/Articles et rapports/Esquisse.htm

Don't take Lindybeige too seriously, especially on the matter of overhand grip.

https://www.facebook.com/TANITdivulgacion/

Celicnon. https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/celicnon

I think the player color should be the biggest area. The Germans were actually coloring their shields a lot, at least for the elites and the nobles. I really suggest to focus on higher grade Germanic shields for the moment, it would be easier. So shields fully colored. So in those examples I would suggest to use blue/red/green area as the player color Edit: by the way do not took in account the subdivision in basic/advanced/elite made on this draft, it was made without any consultation nor approval. Shield boss + shield rims are actually not common.

Why that much armored? The shield rims are too big and too much riveted.