Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 2019-09-02 in Posts
-
6 points
-
6 points
-
6 points
-
5 points
-
5 points
-
4 points
-
To be fair it seems everything is under debate historically speaking4 points
-
4 points
-
Those weren't new civilizations though, just existing ones polished and released to the public. Not saying that there wasn't any work done on them, just that most of the work had already been done. Not sure that has to have all that much relevance to decisions made now as release cycles are longer, but in either case I would suggest not judging what to do based on past process, but on what end result is wanted.3 points
-
To add my opinion, which is definitely needed due to the shortage of people who care about this topic (There is not a hint of sarcasm there), I'd say that the team should focus its efforts on fleshing out one single existing faction. They get a full tech tree, unique flavour when it comes to their units, and the whole works. Developing new factions is a great thing, and we shouldn't discourage that, but the existing factions seem to be little more than skeletons of what they would actually be. After one faction has been done this way, there can be an effort to do so with the others as well. Maybe work out one faction per alpha as a minimum threshold.3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
Age2 DE showmatches starting in a minute here: https://www.twitch.tv/escapeaoe Not sure if they'll be uploaded to yt after stream is finished. Enjoy!3 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Nice man! I can't wait for plume! Will look nice on thureophoroi type Hellenistic units.2 points
-
I'm a little skeptical. I've heard the claim before. Even saying that it would destroy the Amazon. A hyperbole assumption if you ask me, considering that the Amazon didn't just disappear the last time the Sahara was green (though it was smaller). About the plankton, some studies have shown that global plankton populations have already dropped by more than 40% since 1950, while others note rapid plankton growth in the North Atlantic, both phenomenon directly tied to global CO2 levels. A greening of the Sahara could significantly reduce global CO2 levels, cooling the climate, and rather lead to the stabilisation of plankton levels. The dust also mostly comes from a specific place in the Sahara (Bodélé Depression), so, if we just leave that place a desert, we should be ok. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_African_climate_cycles (of course, human activity is making things way worse than it needs to be)2 points
-
2 points
-
I agree. Adding civilization only to add civilization, without having a minimum of documentation about them can be problematic if a nitpicker like me appears. Joke aside, faction like the early Germans are tough to document correctly. But I think one day they need to be include to make the transition to the part II. Currently we should focus on those with enough documentation and on the current factions that are in an upgrading process (thanks to people like you). Anyway I don't see why it should be a problem. Most of the differences are cosmetics/esthetics. All the factions follows the same basis for the buildings and the units, so clearly to bring enough diversity, the game need to include a lot of factions.2 points
-
2 points
-
When was that ? I don't think I ever saw that I would totally love it though Well we still have the performance issue lol but yeah things have change. The increased dow load size might be though (over a certain size you have to have multiple files on windows IIRC) not to mention countries with pay per MB connection (we do have a lot of south america fans) I wish our only issue was adding civs though...2 points
-
2 points
-
I don't think the art department works like that It's more like "Heh look at this flower, it could be better, let's improve that" *Sad bear in the distance* Not really ? I mean the point of part II is to cover another era not to increase the number of civs of the previous one ?2 points
-
It just takes someone to make a decision: "This and this and this are the Wonders we need for these civs, and they are a priority. So, let's get crackin'." Well, isn't that the whole point of "Part II"? lol2 points
-
I'm thinking about it (Though they need to be finished first in any case) They will be in a separate mod called part II. You can just enable both I just need to check with the design document whether addind a gazillion factions is against the original founders idea of the game or not. Back on topic Shouldn't the generic name be hammer man or axeman ?2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
I could fix the error by using this lines: So what I could understand is that skirmish maps will always give you 2 melee units and 2 ranged ones by default, is it correct? I'll probably try to better understand all this thing about skirmish templates in the future. For now, I think I'm moving forward. Thank you guys for all the assistance provided today.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
noooo it never worked like that stop it stop that the seleucids took over 2 years to finish come on now dont you like my TREES1 point
-
Well, it used to work like that, in a bygone era of epic productivity when the game added complete civ sets of artwork every 3-4-month alpha release. Granted, but it would add quite a few civilizations to the mix. I look at the games my son plays, like LoL and others, which have dozens, if not hundreds of different characters to choose from, each with unique and customizable attributes and I don't think a couple dozen civs is all that many for a game of this theme, type, and magnitude. Previous RTSs just had major hardware and software limitations.1 point
-
1 point
-
Partly, I think it's because Empires Ascendant hasn't yet been stripped out of the core mod and made into its own mod. Then it would be relatively simple to create an Empires Besieged official mod to cover "Part II." Depends on how you look at it, because none of them are active anymore. They've "passed it on" to the current keepers of the flame, who are then free to put their own stamp on it. I think you could use the old design as a touchstone when discussions arise, but you aren't bound by it by any means.1 point
-
1 point
-
I'm gonna start with the obvious things first given that the error log is unfortunately empty... Did you make sure to use a lowercase extension ? (eg. 'dae' not 'DAE' or 'Dae') Did you in the actor XML file use an AO dependant material ? (eg. 'player_trans_ao.xml) In this case you need a second UVSet Does your mesh have multiple materials ?1 point
-
Wasn't talking to you specifically, but in general someone should feel at least somewhat responsible for fixing the current mess. Sure there are other, more prestigious task, but If one of you doesn't clean up it'll get even worse.1 point
-
If I'm not mistaken, the game sees those as being multiplayer, so you'll have to select either multiplayer or singleplayer/multiplayer.1 point
-
i don't know if im too used to Aztecs of AoE 2, however i think the cherry top on america's pre-colonial factions would be dirtier and desaturated walls with lots of cracks and ivy or moss growing all over the wood, for show the difference between the faction -500 years ago.1 point
-
Never, my default blend start file always have HDRI. It was the color node had another color group instead of the one i've used for helmets. @Stan` if its okay if i make both versions work? and possibly a third variant? for have some variety on the elephant armor. They are quite big and are is quite easy to note the "Copy Paste" in gameplay so a lil bit distinction should help some.1 point
-
Yep i like that tone too, but imagine this is the same helmet material and still looks different, thats how messy are the blender colors when baking. It should get the same color of the helmet but doesn't, And also @Sundiata has a point on that, following the reference it makes sense the scale goes upward-1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
