Dakara

I don't see any problem for this thing actually. It is not about the game but players. It worse in a lot of other game. In 0AD people try to balance in most of the game, even matchmaking is full random ouf of ranked in a lot of RTS game. I'm just wondering about beginner and intermediate players. They don't have the knowledge to balance the games and smurfs can crush them easily. We must be careful with non-elite players; they are the solid base of the game and they keep the lobby alive, they are useful for balance btw. We could consider developing the user profile, for example with a multiplayer game counter. Of course, the player would have to be able to choose whether or not to display this information. I'm personally in favor of including a team ranking for the moment, but it's an alpha, so anything can be done. Maybe even through a mod.

Don't use it except if you have a plan or a good map for it. Plus if your opponent is low no cata civ maybe you can do some. About tower is nice in early but after it low efficiency and easy to capture , except if the tower are surround by building

a second group with ctrl + number for siege, and shift right click and make a way

45 meter around this heroe all cav have +2 armor (take less damage) in french translate it type +2 attack but it wrong

#74 - Increase the default capture regen of structures - 0ad-community-mod - Wildfire Games something is plan for the roman camp ? or structures 0.5 to 5 is enough?

did you remove the wall change? bcs it was too much op in my opinion i propose few change : reduce melee armor of cata , they tank too muchhh, impossible to snipe easy with melee unit. Balance heroe bonus , some civ have @#$% heroe with no bonus or one only good heroe.

So like immortal you propose a cheap one version?Kush and Athens still have the gold version so? why not I already like the current unit but your change seems interesting In normal version : range is 60 , how much now? like crossbow han? i suppose it become skirmish archer champ. Do you think a expensive tech in castle could add a slow on enemy target for 6 sec with the poison ? for the swordman it was already the best one with ibere

In the current configuration, the catas are powerful. We should not balance the game on this wall hypothesis. Especially when we can lose the allegiance of the walls if the enemy pushes its border. We should nerf the cavalry by choosing some of the ideas from the thread. It's important to keep in mind that a single Citizen Lancer shouldn't be able to kill a cavalry champion. So this won't be a miracle solution. We need to focus on the "invisible" strengths of this unit. Their ability to stack, take up very little space, and move in close quarters isn't really realistic. This way, they decimate enemies. Change this. And their ARMOR!!!! I think that if we nerf this unit too much, the cavalry mercenaries will be the new hell of the game so take care

Building a second city center is equivalent to giving it to your opponent! Moreover, with the number of military improvements too high in the forge (I still don't see why there are two technologies at age 3) building a CC puts you behind from this point of view. On the other hand, the cc have a lower cost than before, now it is possible to make them.

this is the best idea , specially for cav! chariot champ have already this kind of feature

We read you, but you know about all the 100 possible ideas. If you don't put it in the form of code or a mod, people aren't necessarily convinced.

PLEASE delete this topic and send in private to staff not in ffa without spec , noboby know, but in market we see something wrong. NOW how abuse market, without cheat purpose?

The game is a bit deserted... but it's still enjoyable.

wtf no, it so fast 11Min you can be 120-200 pop in tg , if we boost the boom, we destroy more cav rush

warcraft 3 and aoe 2 is 0,25 sec if i'm right, so it's ok

did you try in 1vs1 with someone of your region? you will see , it's good

I'm reading some strange comments. Of course, cavalry should be faster; that's the principle of the unit. It already has minor penalties, such as reduced capture attack and suffering damage multiplication. The solution isn't to have a common citizen unit with a lance destroy a very expensive champion unit! The champion cavalryman is one of the most expensive units, so it must be one of the strongest units. Furthermore, I believe it's necessary to balance champion units between each civilization. If I'm not mistaken, the Persian and Selucid champion cavalrymen are better suited to long melee combat than other civilizations because they have better range and armor. Their range needs to be nerfed and made sure they can't stack too much in a small space. For example, champion chariots already have this feature. This will allow the infantry to do their job. Additionally, it is absolutely necessary to remove the 20% extra life tech on champions.

Try increasing the space between champion cavalry units. You'll see that we'll be a little less OP. A bit like champion chariots. +piercing armor -1 And remove the health boost tech from Persian and Selucid champions. Champion units need to be balanced between civilizations.

x2 spear cav vs cav) -> This will create a lot of problems, right?

partagez-le ♥ TAKE care ally don't make a wall around you lol

I think the game isn't mature and populated enough to have a 5v5 ranking. It will work for a few weeks, then flop. half of the tg will not launch if they are classified, and more to lengthen the waiting time before press ready

Yes, these are effects of cycles and trends. for house, Yes, it was a great advantage, but it had to be anticipated. Fortunately, they still have a difference from other civilizations, even if it's slight.

Answering A21 would be pure nostalgia.. I don't want to spit on the latest features so i go for A23 lol

Bonjour j'ai commencé A21 je suppose tellement impossible pour moi de voter i liked when all civ didnt have ram etc.

we should't fix it, it is like that ahah