wowgetoffyourcellphone

I'd personally err on the side of having smaller ships so we can have larger naval battles. Something like -20% in size.

I thought that was quite clear after only a short while. lol

Can I request you use structural/parth_pediment.png for the frieze? It's much higher resolution.

Ditto

We need alternative attacks and then I can definitely envision allowing melee troops onto walls and giving them this very short range "ranged" attack.

I made a gitea issue about this, but gitea is down for me, else I'd link it.

I do think it looks proportionally small compared to that farmstead. A person definitely have to duck to pass through the arch or to stand under the backside awning. With 0ad buildings, the first floor should look about 90% the correct height next to a civilian, while 2nd floors are only something like 60-70% height accurate. That's the "0ad proportions."

Oftentimes, watching 0 A.D. replays on YouTube knocks me out. Don't know why.

I'd really love to make them work like the Einherjar character from AOM.

Yep. I think the Parthenon could use that treatment too. And Greek docks.

Oh my goodness. Awesome.

Updated Republican Romans hero roster^ New addition: Gracchi Brothers.

Bruh

I didn't put much thought into it, honestly.

I'd love to get these in.

Emblem I'm going to add Gaius Marius as a hero: And I'm thinking of rounding out their hero roster with the... Gracchi Brothers: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Gracchi_brothers The Republican Roman civ's only economically focused Hero options. You'd get two Heroes to train, who are a bit weaker than other heroes, instead of the standard 1 hero.

The Palmyrenes

The Nabataeans

The Xiongnu

The Lusitanians