Jump to content

niektb

WFG Retired
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2.843

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    67

 Content Type 

Everything posted by niektb

  1. niektb
    @balduin: I think it would be somewhat overkill to have a subforum for each civilization (for that handfull of topics that a civ would have). Some clear labeling fo the topics would be good though. We haven't thought about a fourth civ yet (I suppose it's somewhat unnecessary to know it at this point, considering that all three civs are not entirely finished), maybe some South East Asia would be fun? (as long it's a cool civ from a different area than what we have now...)
  2. niektb
    Rise of the East = Terra Magna, compatibility with Vanilla means it's compatible with Terra Magna too. I need to rename a few things here and there but I want to do that simultaneously with announcing the merge and altering the moddb page So, if you ( @balduin @Sundiata) like to, you can open a few topics in the Rise of the East forum (I can move this one too)
  3. niektb
    Current AMD CPUs are pretty old and slow compared to Intel. An Intel i3 is busting an A4 completely. Yet I'm really curious to what Ryzen is going to do. I really hope that AMD makes a comeback
  4. niektb
    Two to three years is a little long for a first playable version. I think it is doable to have on around alpha 23 or at least with alpha 24 (though, of course, it depends a bit on what your understanding of a 'first playable version' is) I agree with the rest of your comment though
  5. niektb
    Then write something in the topic title so that it's clear that it is a mere suggestion to add the civ (rather than an already accepted civ) (maybe organize the content on the fly too?) I agree with Lion that this isn't the best suitable place to post these reference
  6. niektb
    Yes and yes
  7. niektb
    Should be fixed by now. thanks for notifying @Tomcelmare !(and thanks for pinpointing the commit to @Palaxin @leper )
  8. niektb
    if this civ gets into a ''somewhat ready' then I (me personally) am not opposed against it. But I think that the authors from this civ are the ones to make the decision. btw, @balduin @Sundiata: kudo's for the extremely extensive specification pdf
  9. niektb
    @balduin: In that case I think it's best to create new topics and put [Kushites] or something in front of it or something
  10. niektb
    @feneur?
  11. niektb
    The Amazon map is also in the main game, not something we added
  12. niektb
    I don't wanna push myself into public with my crappy soundtrack drafts
  13. niektb
    Nope, no new maps (yet?)
  14. niektb
    So you didn't notice that the normal priest also uses the Ptolemian as placeholder?
  15. niektb
    The building size is slightly different
  16. niektb
    The only thing what's special about it is that you can research a few unique techs. It's barely worth building
  17. niektb
    For the wonder we have the Governmental Center, right? (Okay, maybe we should give it some wonder properties)
  18. niektb
    I moved the topic to the Game Modification forum, seemed a more appropriate location to me
  19. niektb
    But hey, let's first finish the Kushites
  20. niektb
    Easy, just add a new texture variant in the actors
  21. niektb
    Just curious but, could you detail on what you mean with a 'RotE style'? Do you mean an expansion pack without actually altering gameplay (but just civilizations)?
  22. niektb
    The player should be prohibited to block off the trade route
  23. niektb
    Ah, this seems like something that I need for Silk Road!
  24. niektb
    @Lion.Kanzen: no need to (for now, please read your PM inbox )
  25. niektb
    For the remaining error I would try to remove/alter the minheight property at line 7: <prop actor="props/structures/decals/city_tile_3x3.xml" attachpoint="root" minheight=""/>
×
×
  • Create New...