Lion.Kanzen

the game is not enough optimized yet, many of us have that problem, but aren't the frame , try don't use shadows and don't play in huge map or many units in maps , the lag happens when Ai try to spam many units to attack so This way the CPU try to calculate the pathfinder for an army and over heat your computer.

is not the frames the problem, is the pathfinder.

The problem with rank still there.

I feel more our units slower than other factions, building and walking

Can be good addend the military cívic centre their real chape and change the icon to military settlement and discard fortress one.

is the best the blue one. because in game the are too much green by the ambient

looks similar to my water issue.

When you search the last rank tech in barracks the game freezes.

After the last rank reseach the game is freeze , this the second time with Rise of the East.

hehehe was funny when i see it. i say to myself WTH...

ok i will try latter with that one.

can you provided some not too caligraphic?

thank you I was have that doubt

we need fix the cavalry archer name.

I design a new one.

what happens with Han emblem?

The pivot catapult, known as the traction trebuchet, had existed in China since the Warring States period (as evidenced by the Mozi).[203] It was regularly used in sieges during the Han dynasty, by both besiegers and the besieged.[203] The most common projectile weapon used during the Han dynasty was the small handheld, trigger-activated crossbow (and to a lesser extent, the repeating crossbow), first invented in China during the 6th or 5th century BCE.[204] Although the nomadic Xiongnu were able to twist their waists slightly while horse-riding and shoot arrows at targets behind them, the official Chao Cuo (d. 154 BCE) deemed the Chinese crossbow superior to the Xiongnu bow.[205] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_and_technology_of_the_Han_dynasty

Strangely enough, we found little mention of siege weaponry right after the demise of the Qin and in the succeeding Han dynasty. The Han dynasty (206 B.C.-A.D. 220), further extended the borders of China, establishing the first official military outposts along the narrow northwestern corridor of what would eventually be known as the Silk Route. Investigations of the writings from the highly fragmented bamboo-strip Shoufa Shouling Shi San Pian, a manual on siege warfare from the Han dynasty, revealed a reference to a mobile weapon called the Ji (or Jie) Che Plough Cart, with a 50bu (75m) range, spaced on top of defensive walls at intervals of 200bu (300m) for 5-crew versions and 50bu for smaller 3-crew versions: " for high Ji Che that have a range of 50 bu, one is deployed every 200 bu, while smaller Ji Che are deployed every 50 bu. A crew of 5 for every large Bei (Cup), while a crew of 3 for every small Bei." With a relatively short 50bu range, this Ji Che might have been a small traction catapult and not an arcuballista, as ranges for even the smallest arcuballistas would had easily exceeded this distance. The use of the word Bei (Cup) might refer to the use of a scoop instead of a sling to seat a projectile, and fired in a seesaw-like motion. This perhaps even explained the word Plough in the name. However, as there was no further information available to be gleaned from the bamboo-strips, the workings of this mobile catapult remained elusive. In the Huai Nan Zi ca. 120 B.C. we found a description of a Wu Gang Che or Military Strong Cart, one of the few references to Han era field artillery: "Ancient soldiers were armed only with bows and swords; their spears had no pick-axes and their bills no hooks. But the soldiers of the late times have had to be equipped with battering rams for attack, and shields against the arrows; they shoot with multi-bolt crossbows which are lashed to carriages for the fight." From the Han Shu or Records of the Han one more reference stood out, in Li Ling's campaign of 99 B.C. for the possible use of a Han era arcuballista. Beleaguered and harassed in a fighting withdrawal deep in nomad country, Li Ling's army used what seemed to be wagon mounted crossbows in a defensive formation to defend against the attacking Shanyu cavalry. The early formative years of the Han surely must have employed great numbers of siege machines of some sort but to date, there is scant evidence of such in written records and none in Han era excavations. One theory that might account for this sudden disappearance is that the Han, unlike the combative states of the Warring States period, had little need for large siege weapons. The borders of the Han neighboured empty nomad steppe lands and vast deserts. This forced a more mobile style of warfare onto Han commanders and instead of sedentary siege techniques we see the development of lager type infantry squares as temporary defenses and an emphasis on highly mobile cavalry in an extremely early version of maneuver warfare, helping project Han military might beyond the garrisoned borders of China.

Catapults have been in use by the various cultures throughout history. One very early possible reference to catapults came to us from Part 2 of the Book of Chronicles (Chapter 26, verses 14 & 15) in the old testament of the Bible which referred to the defense of Jerusalem during the reign of Uzziah of Judea in the late 9th century B.C. "Uzziah provided for all the army the shields, spears, helmets, coats of mail, bows and stones for slinging. In Jerusalem he set up machines, invented by skilled workers, on the towers and the corners for shooting arrows and large stones. And his fame spread far, for he was marvelously helped until he became strong." It was not immediately clear what form these "machines... for shooting arrows and large stones" were, but from the distinction the passage made between these machines and the "bows and stones for slinging" provided to the army, it does seem possible that they were siege engines of some sort. However, there remains no corroborative evidence of 9th century B.C. Hebrew catapults, and this reference to a possible catapult may instead have been a result of an error in the translation of the original Hebrew text. In the original text by Ezekiel written ca. 580 B.C., the word used was karim which meant battering ram, but this was mistranslated by the Greek chronicler in 250 B.C. to the word "belostaseiz" or "ballistarium" in Latin, meaning "artillery platform". Interesting article about siege warfare by Israelites can be good for siege warfare. http://www.grandhistorian.com/chinesesiegewarfare/siegewarfare-briefhistory.html

there is the tower

http://www.grandhistorian.com/chinesesiegewarfare/siegewarfare-introduction.html Here are good reading about evolution of China's Siege Warfare

I will Added a existent blacksmith temporary.