Stan`

@Lion.Kanzen https://skfb.ly/OYZw @sanderd17 can try with ptol columns.

Same with Ptol Back and Improved Mosaic.

That's Seleucid Texture X) Pillars are Ptolemaic though.

What about the rest ?

I can do that Done,

Sure as soon as there's only minor tweaks remaining, there are a lot of props in that model ^^

What about Hestia goddess

I guess that's up to @Enrique and @LordGood to edit that texture or not. The only upside I see with it being yellow is that it gives an egyptian feeling. Fountain version for @wowgetoffyourcellphone

Do we have anything like this in the game ?

Well it's still a military building not a city building so walls have to be high to actually protect something. Yes I was thinking making tiles Tile version :

Indeed the point is modification will probably be made, and then will be a good time for adding garrison flags

When/If @sanderd17 finishes #3983/#131 We will need prop points for flammes/decay, so that will be a good time for this.

What are you guys up to ?

Trashed Fountain Reversed Tent Removed Decal Added some props

It's quite hard to do that since texture don't match much, I mixed Seleucid Greek and Ptol textures to reduce the contrast difference. But since it's supposed to be a Greek building surrounded by Ptol walls it's a bit tricky Yeah would probably be better if only military I was trying to follow Michael's comment on the ticket: EDIT : Militarized version Removed Trees Added Doors Added Greek Tent Kept the fountain as you want to have water when you are in the desert.

Not yet, but soon maybe http://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/252

Afaik they do now that sanderd fixed some stuff about them.

Somewhat, since we are planning to be able to resume a game after rejoining by sending data to the player. So that would be an extension of that. Also ticket was edited two hours ago.

So... I had those exams to work for... and this happened. Refs #2214

I think the decay was to simulate the fact they are temporary

That should not happen in my last patch, have you checked it ? It only did in the first one. Sounds fair, looks like some CPP will be coming along... Maybe it's broken in the templates ?

I think that's because now classes are mandatory, I removed the optionnal keyword. Sorry for the late reply. I did play it, but making units movable is another problem, since it relies on pathfinder more than anything else. Visible Garrisoned units don't/can't move, only rotate. Same that's totally different ^^ Well currently in the game it's used for walls. I am not adding a new feature, I'm extending it to all buildings. This is already in the game.

+1 I managed to open it with MPHC; It looks nice to me maybe you should invert the last part so that the logo gets in place instead of getting out of the screen.

@wowgetoffyourcellphone Can I see your templates ? @FeXoR My bad I might have been somewhat distracted when answering last time. That's why they shouldn't be automatically replaced IMHO. That is the current state of the patch. I don't see why this will have a bad impact on gameplay since it's only adding a bit to what's already in the game AKA units on walls. I'm just allowing different kinds of units on buildings/walls. 1 - 2 This is already what happens in the game right now. 3. True, I did not think of that. We are not forced to use big siege engines either. 4. It would make sense since it will lower down the capture protection. And that assume units are automatically replaced which they are not in the current state of the patch. Dunno how hard it is to do. Wonder if @sanderd17 still have his old patch.

@wowgetoffyourcellphone You should probably use my last patch now. It fixes some issues