Stan`

@wraitii Mimo had a lot of concerns from what I read

@wraitii So what's needed for that patch ?

@JuKu96 It's not really single threaded. But some of the big stuff AI, Pathfinder and NetClient are running in the same thread. Well life caught him back and he now has other priorities than to work on the best RTS to date. @JuKu96 You could try starting off were Andy left the patch. See what he did analyse and then fix it and port it to code.wildfiregames.com. that would lift the task from elexis shoulders. As someone who has been here for 6 years trust me the hardest part is not contributing. It's starting to code. Once you breach that barrier things start to get easier. I didn't even know I could do big patches or C++ before then. About documentation. we are improving it slowly by enforcing jsdoc and doxygen.

Too bad @andy5995 had to give up on this...

Would be a nice and quite unique feature.

There is as far I know, no plans to reduce that number.

@JuKu96 the person just above you was working on it. He doesn't anymore, because that doesn't make much sense since STUN has been implemented. It wouldn't make the game any faster any way.

iber_arrows.blend

I can send you the arrow models I made for the fist shooting range

The thing is there are no 0ad server. When you host you are the server. So if something goes wrong it's your connection. There had been talks and WIPs about a dedicated server option. I don't know how dare @elexis has gone with that.

Starting to know his humor, I'd say no

Haha ^^ @Alexandermb Feel like doing it ?

I would have updated it myself, but I don't know what we strive for anymore.

@Nescio I guess that's what https://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/ArtDesignDocument was for. It defines how names should be how folders convention are etc.

So... Can we assume your are coming back to modding ?

How do you handle capture and or the full destruction of the wall ? Maybe a solution would be to make the request of the undying nephalim come true as being able to build buildings on the edge would be cool. Also could be used for fortresses.

As long as they are constructive that's okay. I feel like it's normal that the stables look rich in the sense that it's a phase 2 building and stables are not really a common thing... I tried to fit the current Brit design and the stables shape. What would you do with it ?

Actually I was a bit too fast

@LordGood Feel like adding something different to your portfolio ? @Alexandermb

brit_stables.zip Brittonnic Stables by StanislasDolcini on Sketchfab

AFK reasons ?

Listen kids... When... Lel I wonder why they choose that name back then.

Indeed it was #2577 for which he had a branch.

Or use the original convention consistently. Where cc is Civic center barracks are mc (military center etc) But yeah it would be annoying to track and noise for trac.

Dual attacks is not possible yet @bb is(was) on it.