Jump to content

Imarok

WFG Programming Team
  • Content Count

    988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Imarok last won the day on March 10 2019

Imarok had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

621 Excellent

1 Follower

About Imarok

  • Rank
    Centurio

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3.022 profile views
  1. If people are recording such an attack with e.g. wireshark and it's really 0ad that is getting DDOSed, we might be able to improve things by getting a look at the records. But if the attack is against your router or against your whole PC we can't do much against it. (A single car also can do nothing if someone jumps on the street and causes a traffic jam)
  2. I guess that would be quite difficult to implement. (imagine the elephant turns and the mahout just slides in an arc along the ground)
  3. Oops, I thought it was 0% xD Was it added in A24?
  4. As noted here: the mauryan worker elephant needs a mahout (some person sitting on it and controlling it). If this is done it also can get back its ability to help on building structures. Corresponding ticket on trac: #6091
  5. If you have a replay of it happening please create a ticket and upload it there.
  6. If one wants to go for the Scout-is-a-Hunter idea instead of the Scout-is-only-a-Scout idea one could also - give the Scout better hunting stats - or reduce the hunting stats of normal civ (but not remove the hunting ability)
  7. I'm strongly in favour of these changes: - Newly built CCs always start as village phase CCs and have to be upgraded individually. (This gives the enemy time to fight for that territory) - As soon as you have less than 66% capture points you can't delete a building. (This also the threshold in many democracies to vote on major changes (see wikipedia:Supermajority) and deleting a building is a major change ;))
  8. I know I'm totally irrational about this, but I loved watching the elephants putting wooden beams on buildings with their trunks.
  9. Not really. In theory a software is called "Beta" when it runs stable enough and has most of the needed features. (Which we already fullfill imho. The issue is that the change was gradually, so there never was a point at which we could pinpoint it and say "Now we're really in Beta". I guess we could just start calling it Beta when we run out of the letters of the alphabet. ;D)
  10. Not really. I mean it's only a alpha cause we call it so. (We could as well already proclaimed it as beta )
  11. It's not only a visual thing. When I send rams to attack something and there is a straight way through some smaller gap, they first regroup and then choose to go a long way around cause their formation doesn't fit through. If they wouldn't be using formation they'd reached their goal way faster. The constant regrouping is also a bit annoying within a fight.
  12. I agree with @OptimusShepard that it looks quite bad in forests and in narrow passages. Maybe deactivate it by default? Else we might get many reports after the release.
  13. We should just have female and male workers with the same stats. This seems more accurate. I think working on fields or in mines was more a concern of class/caste than of sex in these times. Regarding female warriors: I lack the historic knowledge about that. But it seems that newer research doesn't support this thesis that in the past (without some exceptions) only men were warriors throughout the history. (not sure if this research applies on 0ads timeframe) Edit: @Sundiata might know something about that topic as well.
  14. I always got confused by the wording. So imho using an other word to make it more clear does definitely make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...