feneur

Video for cover is available

Considering that he hasn't logged in to the forums for four years, it's unlikely that you will get a reply

Definitely worth considering. I do think it would be worth creating a video for this purpose specifically. I looked at your example and it looked as if they had just used an existing video and cut away a bit at the top (and possibly bottom), and it did feel a bit weird - as if there should be more above it, I kept wanting to scroll up the page to see more =)

Not sure that's a good idea as anyone can post anything there, without us being able to control it in the slightest. It could be both offensive and spam and so on, so it would have to be closely watched if that's to be added.

It's not my decision to make though

Most likely, it just doesn't seem to be all that urgent as you still can use the forum without easily reading the bread crumb links (+ I have been busy), so I have been postponing it. I should hopefully be able to look into this, and other things, during the next couple of days though. I am a bit uncertain whether or not there might be something that causes things to be different for different people. The breadcrumbs are gray to me, but they are mentioned to be pastel? Maybe it's because they are all marked as visited for me The text on the Create New Topic button on an existing topic is not high contrast no, but the one in a forum is easy to see, so again, nice to improve, but not urgent.

If the quoted part is what is causing controversy I'd say there's really no need to worry. It does really just say that they can use content transmitted via their service in the operation of their service. I'd say that license is probably required to at all be able to run such a service (if they can't display it, how can you see what someone else writes? If they can't create derivate works, how can they say create thumbnails of images or things like that? If they can't publish it, how can someone else see what you write? etc), the "perpetual" part is probably a bit unnecessary, but otherwise it'd be hard to create logs - or the license would have to define a set limit. Not sure there are logs, but if there are =) Not sure what you want me to do here :unsure:

IIRC SpiderMonkey can either be system-wide or specific to 0 A.D. could it be that you are using the former and that somehow affects things? I would assume not as that would have been more logical if you always had the issue, than if it just has begun. SpiderMonkey is all that 0 A.D. and FireFox has got in common though, right?

This forum is fine for it.

I assume it's RGBA, and am pretty sure that 0 is 0% and 255 is 100% of a given color

Is it possible to only display the range in certain situations? (E.g. when a tower is selected or when you are placing a foundation.) If so I doubt it would add many circles at the same time, but I could be wrong =)

A square masked off.

Done

Thanks for the reminder, I'll get right on it

You certainly can sell them. And while we might not have stated it recently we have at least previously had the opinion that the creator of something is free to decide if he/she does something else with the content. (Obviously you would have to abide by the license if you are e.g. using an existing texture etc, but for something you have created from scratch.)

I don't think we have specified how we want it, nor is there any general recommendation that I am aware of. But that would be one option yes. Report them with evidence of copyright theft if the store allow you to do that.

No. The question is also whether they make their art available under the same license (or at least any art that is based on cc-by-sa art, exactly what happens when you combine art with different licenses is too complicated for non-lawyers to discuss generally =) ). :-P If they only use art from others I guess that point is quite moot though. *rolleyes* But generally speaking they are allowed to use our art, as long as they give credit and make anything they create based on it available under the same license. That doesn't go for non-free/CC/OS Art though. That's a clear violation of the law.

At the moment we don't really have someone who has the responsibility for audio. I think @Itms and possibly @Pureon as well have some opinion on it as least, but ideally we would find someone who can focus on it So you are definitely welcome @Ell

Split out into its own topic, I hope I gave it a decent title, but if not please suggest improvements

True, I guess I can't either. But at the same time, I don't really think it's an issue, so I'd rather leave the possibility open in case there is a reason in the future.

We could of course make it impossible, but seeing as wrong topics can be moved or deleted I don't really see the issue. Maybe there will be a reason for someone to post a topic there, so I rather keep the possibility open.

I definitely think it's worth thinking about, I am not saying it is a necessarily bad idea. I do however think it would have to be explained well if we include a 20th century person in a game that takes place 2000 years ago

It would not surprise me if the next version was named in his honor, but I don't know if it would be a good idea to include him as a character in the game. It feels like it could be disrespectful, but maybe not. I didn't know him, so I can't really say. Maybe @Wijitmaker has got a better idea of whether or not it would be a good thing. Regardless it would probably be more relevant with a historical figure. Maybe Aristotle?

Well, if having virtual people create virtual temples is an issue, wouldn't causing virtual people to die be against "Thou shalt not kill"?

I'm not sure it might be related, but just seeing as you are installing on another drive than C:\\, do you have at least a couple of GBs free on the C:\\ drive? Even if you install the game on another drive the installer requires there to be enough free space on the C:\\ drive.