Jump to content

wowgetoffyourcellphone

0 A.D. Art Team
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11.002

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    556

 Content Type 

Everything posted by wowgetoffyourcellphone

  1. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    The textures are already exquisite.
  2. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    I wish unit training limits could be iterated by techs. Currently it can only be affected by 1 tech only. No way to allow for further techs to affect the limit after the first one.
  3. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    @Sun Wukong A new Mauryan palace is coming for A28.
  4. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    I think this will take a couple Alphas/iterations to get feeling good.
  5. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    0.2 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.65 0.2 0.9 0 still gives me death balls. :/
  6. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    I wonder how it can look more Arabic.
  7. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Nice. Shields? Spears?
  8. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    By virtue of simply having access to archers, Carthage is an "archer civ" sure, but that doesn't mean their archers have to be particularly good. In fact, I'm not aware of a single recorded historical incident of Carthage using archers to effectiveness. Elephants, mercenaries, and skirmish cavalry should be their trifecta.
  9. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    The only reason to introduce such a thing again would be for asymmetry. As an aside, I don't think I've ever agreed with a single one of your gameplay takes. It's kinda strange.
  10. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Ugh they used to. Another A24 casualty
  11. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Well, for now a "season" could just be the lifespan of an alpha.
  12. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    They are saying barracks should add to the pop cap, like houses do, and that fortresses should add more to the pop cap than they already do.
  13. wowgetoffyourcellphone
  14. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Necroreply.
  15. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Why are walls even capturable to begin with?
  16. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Or just disable <Capturable> in all walls.
  17. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Yeah, it's a mess. If they want them to depict the 4th/5th century Western Romans (which is not contemporary with the "Celts" and "Britons" in the game, who are depicted around 1200 AD, wth!), then their campaign should have nothing to do with Trajan's campaigns, which should use Romans from the high empire era, with lorica segmentata. Their campaign should have been about Aetius or (pushing it) Constantine (would have been cool, since it genuinely would allow the player to triumph).
  18. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    REALLY
  19. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    That is really confusing, but if true then it makes more sense. Still kind of weird since they already have a much more appropriate Byzantine faction for that.
  20. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    I don't really buy this justification, since this expansion is supposed to bring AOE's time period to the AOE2 engine.
  21. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    None of the civs had to fit with each other before. So, it's still an odd or noteworthy design choice.
  22. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Pretty much. They should just not have the decay element enabled.
  23. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    I'm curious as to why they are depicting the Roman army as the 4th century Dominate instead of the usual 1st-2nd century Principate.
  24. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    There used to be a large and robust Deathmatch scene back in the MSN Gaming Zone days of AOE1 and AOE2. I myself ran an exclusively Deathmatch clan for these games for about 3 years.
  25. wowgetoffyourcellphone
    Let's add it to the base game!
×
×
  • Create New...