Silier

yes, delete old saved games

This shouldn't be possible. Maybe with modified code yes.

Because towers have elevation bonus by themselves

Yes stances could be unified when entering formation but which one to pick if there are multiple set, or always set default?, there us also question what with healers in formation.

Its more like floating banner in total war rather than actual banner. The banner is the formation controller. The banner carrier can be created but there is number of questions with it. Can fight, what if dies, is just decoration? Technically there could be unit instead the banner for formation controller but don't know how animations would work

werent all history strings just removed at some point?

I think they are correct. This looks buggy. Reforms should lock only units trained on the ship. From reasoning of the technology units in the dock should be locked only by city phase. So or technology was not updated or some update used wrong template. Just to track: Added to docks here without clear reasoning, previously only at ships: https://code.wildfiregames.com/rP18024

I guess you are using formations. It looks like they got stuck at eachother. @wraitii ping

0.) kind of known issue 1.) how many ais?

Refs: https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/5396

Could you upload both files mentioned in the exception message?

@Nullus 1.) open /src/init/lib/PhutilBootloader.php, find line 275 and note the function name. 2.) make backup of /usr/share/arcanist/src/workflow/ArcanistWorkflow.php 3.) find the function definition in ArcanistWorkflow.php from point 1 4.) remove word "final"

Ai looses based on the match winning conditions. Should resign? Possibly yes.

Hmm yes, I think ai just ignores gaia for the most part. Also naval deffense/attack almost does not exist inside Petra.

@vladislavbelov

@ranging_botanist @Rarius https://play0ad.com/re-release-of-0-a-d-alpha-25-yauna/

I dont trust system info

Hi @hjkkll, what is your graphic card?

Its more pathfinder issue. @wraitii Or bear can't get away bc units are blocking or it thinks its away. @0adda0 can you upload the replay of the match?

I remember there being ticket where it was discussed to merge lobby accounts with forum ones but it was turned down as a lot of work for little benefit

Technically we need just another column in database for displayname and keep current username as "id". And of course a lot of new code so someone who will write it.

I didn't say you do. I was reacting to the statement I quoted. You missed my point. A->X means A is available so B->A is valid from system point, unless obsolent database will be kept with all previous names.

If one is honest with skill while balancing teams and has well-known account, why to hide it in a first place. After some time players will notice player on certain account is good unless they don't play to their best skills on purpose but then they are not honest about their skill in the first place. It doesn't. No one knows it even with one account. If someone's account is banned for breaking TOS, by this rule all their access is restricted. But one can't trust anyone because people lie, when they can. If there is one account per person, this is not needed because good players would be recognised automatically. Or by gained rating or just by their name. So let's say one wants to play on lower level and will play the way the balancing will not be broken even if one can play better. Are 2 accounts per person enough? Supposing one keeps their playstyle on lower level one would not be discovered as smurfer so there is no need to have more than 2 accounts for that purpose. If one can't do it they will create more and more accounts because others notice they are good player? If you change your appearance people still recognise you when they meat you or talk with you, unless you do the drastic change and change also your voice and name. In lobby, username is everything others have to recognise you as a player. No one cares who sits there irl. Yes, changing username could be an option that for now is not possible like changing the password. Lets suppose it is allowed to change the username. Lets imagine player A changes username to Y and some malicious user B changes username to A and tries to destroy reputation of that player. That's currently not possible unless someone knows password of the player A. So here is example why changing username can be dangerous feature.

Hi @Karmo, could you upload replay of that game? If you open replay menu and find the correct one, at the bottom should be path of that replay, open that path in your system explorer and all we need is command file.

You need to put whole Commands.js under simulation/helpers