wowgetoffyourcellphone

I just think if the helmet prop is move downward (just a little) and tilted forward (just a little) the helmets would look fine without extra work. Especially at RTS zoom and angle, the helmets being slightly too big is not problem, in fact many unit are identifiable by their helmets. But this may be because you are perfectionist you want a comprehensive fix, and I respect that Enrique. I just fear the additional work it will take from you when your immeeasurable talents can be of use elsewhere. (In related, I think all Corinthian-style helmetss need remodeled to fit the new heads and not need the old "face head".)

Handicap or Penalty are best terms methink. Though, "Attack Handicap" sound weird. "Attack Penalty" sound better to me, YMMV.

Is not game to have a encyclopedia or something like this with descriptions? Then terminology should be correct, common, and consistent!

Bonus is a real English word, malus is not.

Hi. I think the shield look all wrong for javelinist. Maybe the round shield would be better.

Does have AO map too? I think the little squares can be iron?

btw I think use word "Penalty" instead of "malus" which is not real English word.

256x256 for unit

Could wait to make that determination at the end of development cycle I think, when download size finally determined. Remember, some AAA titles are 10+ GB. 0 A.D. already saving ton space by not use pre-render cutscenese.

This does look great LordGoo. Like Enrique said, only minor problem is with back foot (current Hoplite animations have this problem too haha). But you still get +1. the movement of the sling is good visual selling point.

Maybe 1 more step in the anim for realism. Have left hand replace loose end of sling into throwing hand?

This is good information, thank you.

Right, the name should be (is?) Temple of Apollo at Daphne. Then in description it can go into more detail of the Paradise. I think too the Seleucids can have some garden eye candy objects in the game.

Hi guy. So, for civ bonuses and penalties. What would be best for performance of game? To use player aura or auto-research tech? Are they initiated by the match differently? Does the game treat them different or not at all? Same performance or is one less efficient than the other? Thank you. Performance is important to me. Here is example. In my mod I would like to give the Celt units -1 hack armor, but +10% movement rates. Would be best to use a player aura or to use auto-research tech?

Do not have any ambition for campaign? What is the plan? And the game has all kind of eyecandy stuff and buildings.Maybe should delete all of those too?

I think Diplo screen need complete redesigning to be the honest. And I like your suggestion. 1. Should not see civs of each player until they have been scouted. 2. Maybe see info about your allies after you have research Cartography (expanding on jonbaier's idea). 3. Tribute needs complete overhaul, the way the buttons work, everything, (and would be nice to have tribute penalty at first that can be remove with tech, like in AOE franchise). 4. Overall the window is too small for new stuff/updated overhaul.

AO maps need 2nd set of UVs exported with mesh. Also, each mesh need to generate its own AO map in Blender first.

I use to have a PDF that told of the commands that would be use in a phalanx battle. I will see if I can fins.

Just make some with the different civ building textures. Persians Ptol and Carths textures would be good for desert, etc.

The current ruin objects are good start! Keep going with it. Ruined Greek temples. Ruined Persian temples. etc. Burned out/destroyed versions of some buildings. Don't forget AO maps.

The game is not currently large at all. AAA downloads are now approaching 50GB (this is of course excessive, but 0 A.D. download is what? 600mb?).

Right, but not like it can't go into Atlas for eye candy or other purposes it's what I'm saying.

Why delete in first place? ...

Old tavern was not deleted was it?