Lion.Kanzen

that's redoing the game again. 0 ad is focused in phases. In the development of a city or a province than in the evolution of an empire.

I'm not saying your ideas are bad, just that they need some consideration and research. You should gain more experience by playing more games and also by living life. I understand that you want to implement catapults, you must use your imagination to immerse yourself in what that era was like and what was being done. For example I consider that 0AD should have a suicide unit that does damage as in other strategy games. Example suicide units that do damage to buildings, that idea is from SC2 (Bannelings) and the Petards from AoE II plus the Slaves from Stronghold.

Why not include Babylon and Assyria and cover the period after the Bronze Age collapse. After the fall of Solomon's kingdom in Israel. That's when Assyria, Egypt, Kush and Babylon have a good time tearing each other apart. Not to mention that it could cover the Etruscan s in Italy. A thousand years seems exaggerated to me, I would put 800BC-800AD.

.Fortified mercenary camp Level II-III of the mercenary camp would be interesting to hire champion mercenary.

@wowgetoffyourcellphone I like your idea of Max attackers could work with these implementations. Do you have any idea how to avoid Mosh Pit ? Perhaps an instruction that makes the units not get disordered or try to maintain formation and another that allows flanking or encircling.

The problem is that this guy is thinking only about Towers walls and fortress and is not thinking about the civic center and its economy (women villagers) being destroyed by this implementation. Because this mean you just do a Rush to the fields where the women are and GG. the CC will not be able to keep the villagers alive.

I think it would be a good idea to record videos of how certain strategies are developed in the game.

They should play Stronghold It's basically siege castles. literally hours of siege, hence my desire to add more siege techniques to the game and more fire damage. You would have to lower the armor of the towers, it's very op but keep the wall and fortresses.

Correct, it is preventing something that does not bother many. As you said, it is a suggestion. And as it is, there is no further opinion on my part. As I said above, I will no longer give my opinion and it's over. PS:The posts die when they do not receive an answer.

I'm ok with this. All of this makes sense.

How would it be then?

I will make an arabic version of this one in the future.

this makes better sense. limit it to start at 0 and add +1(attack) then x2(arrows) damage and then increase by 50%.

I plan to make an inferior or simpler adaptation based on the DE concept. then this version would be Mercenary camp fortified. a more difficult version to capture.

•Trough. •Sawhorse •Banners •Palisades •Barrels •Ladder tourches table I haven't had much time lately. here I am advancing the props.

this topic is perfect.

The second one. The DE had not been released when I made the first one. I like to keep the order of each large RTS which is like 0 A.D. And have a single one for the new titles.

@Stan`

I estimate that it should be ready by June.

Tal como eu pensei./ Just as I thought.

8-10 rams get a good work take one by one + an overwhelming army.

I have never seen such a thing in this game. In 0AD the best players don't destroy you by playing defensively. Turtling is very unfeasible. I will consult an expert or a couple. @Yekaterina @borg- Have you ever seen such a thing?

Iberian players,? lol. Your argument is already going wrong. Explain in detail your idea how this is going to improve? I don't see it. It seems to me that you are assuming that we are mind readers. very logical. Indeed, very undesirable. Now force the players to eject the units and then destroy the tower. In my opinion it seems more of a personal convenience. In my experience as soon as you destroy the tower and it has a superior army, no matter if there is damage or not, they will die. It was sarcasm, read it again I don't want to repeat it. What I am saying is that you are going to destroy one of the least used tactics. And at least you will give them a hard time.

This one comes better in the AoE II DE post.

Oh ....turtling the most used strategy for 0AD... Removing one of three strategies seems to me to be a very weak argument.