All Activity

The world of internet gambling has evolved significantly past what most people could have predicted a ten years ago. What was once a small-scale pastime has transformed into a worldwide phenomenon, delivering players an nearly limitless selection of sites, games, and experiences. Whether you’re a experienced player or simply curious about the options available, finding a casino that genuinely fits your style is crucial to getting the most from the experience. In 2026, the scene are more varied than ever before. Some platforms prioritize rapid withdrawals, allowing players to claim their funds in moments rather than days. Other platforms are known around huge game collections, featuring countless slots, live dealer tables, and exclusive games you won’t find anywhere else. Then there are the blockchain-based casinos, where blockchain technology offers not just fast transactions, but a new layer of transparency and security. What determines a casino as genuinely “exceptional” depends entirely on what you prioritize the most. For certain players, it’s the welcome bonus—a attractive package that gives you extra playtime right from the start. For other players, it’s the reliability of payouts, with the confidence that when you request a withdrawal, the process will be smooth and straightforward. And for many, it’s just the overall experience: polished layout, helpful customer service, and a phone-friendly design that works seamlessly on every gadget. Consistently, certain names have consistently risen to the front. These are the casinos that combine strong licensing, a broad selection of banking options, and a real dedication to player experience. fastest payout online casino australia embodies precisely that level of quality—a place where you can count on both excellence and consistency. That said, the best approach is to do your research with a good idea of what you’re seeking. Do you lean toward spinning pokies, or do you prefer traditional casino classics like roulette and blackjack? Are you wanting a platform that embraces digital currency as a primary option, or do you feel more comfortable with the familiarity of e-wallets and PayID? Knowing your own priorities will make it far simpler to identify the right match. In the end, the right platform for you isn’t necessarily the one with the flashiest bonus or the boldest design. It’s the one that feels dependable, that processes withdrawals as promised, and that makes you feel confident whenever you visit. If you’re prepared to check out the options, take your time, compare a few options, and choose the platform that suits how you truly like to play.

I work on a similar mod, and I have started with the Mauryas. Some ideas I am testing. Temple can be build on neutral terrain, but does not project a sphere of influence Several new Temple technologies (not necessarily unique to the Maur): Aura around Temples that increase worker gathering and building rate; Temples grants structures +x% territory influence radius Historical reasoning: It is claimed that Ashoka spread Buddhism and interlocking of religion and economics / state Stables and Elephant Stables switch places Historical reasoning: According to sources I have read elephants accounted for about 20% of the empire's "cavalry"; enough to use some leeway to make them gameplay-wise more relevant, and make the Civ more unique Visha Kanya can be trained in the Temple Only trainable after researching a tech? Are one or both of them trainable in P2? If Archer is trainable in P2, P3 tech to increase poison damage Swordwoman has a damage bonus against heroes Still trainable in Palace? Give all Maur heroes an aura that buffs Visha Kanyas? Historical reasoning: According to the folk lore Visha Kanyas were young girls who were administered various poisons and antidotes to make their bodily fluids toxic, and then sent out to assassinate influential targets by being intimate with them

Shameless self-adulation: All changes of the above mod will be in 0.29, btw. Better GUI: You have a better structure overview in the main menu, and it adds more hotkeys. You can also use it to "cheat" if you want to. Haven't tested it, but this seems to be good: This makes the differences between Civilians and Citizens more noticeable, as currently male Civilians and Citizens use the same voice:

French =B

public Litterally, a must-have.

Also Spanish =B

Offizielle Website https://www.fitprodiet.com/syngas-bewertungen/ https://www.fitprodiet.com/wego-6-kapseln/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DWi5BpHE1-8/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DWi5IcWk58M/ https://www.instagram.com/p/DWi5PZkEwv9/ Besuchen Sie unsere Facebook-Seite und unsere Gruppen https://www.facebook.com/SynGasBewertungen/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngasoffiziellewebseite/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngas2026/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngasrabattangebot/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngaserfahrungen2026/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngasprieswokaufen/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngaswirkungundnebenwirkungen/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngasstecker2026/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/syngaschiperfahrungen2026/

In my case, I was pleasantly surprised by:

What is clearance? It is 0.8 for most units. Roughly regarded as the size of a unit. Reference: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/src/branch/main/binaries/data/mods/mod/simulation/data/pathfinder.xml#L58 Clearance as full width In the calculation of pushing, each unit is first considered as a 0.8 × 0.8 square. Then the radius of the circumscribing circle is 0.8 × √2 ÷ 2. Reference: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/src/branch/main/source/simulation2/components/CCmpUnitMotion_System.cpp#L78 Clearance as half width In regarding unit as obstruction, each unit is considered as an axis aligned 1.6 × 1.6 square. Reference: https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/src/branch/main/source/simulation2/components/CCmpObstructionManager.cpp#L305

:B https://www.youtube.com/@titovicent1952

I think there is a misconception here. Country (or countryside) doesn't equate to farmlands. The semantic flexibility of the Greek ἀγρός (agros) hinges on the shift from a functional unit to a geographical zone. The meaning diverges based on the narrative focus: it either refers to "farmlands" as a collection of tangible assets and wealth (emphasizing what a person owns), or it refers to the "countryside" as a rural region (emphasizing where a person is, which is often the case in the New Testament). This distinction is most visible when the singular is used to describe the "open country" surrounding a settlement; in these instances, the word ceases to be about farming specifically and instead serves as a spatial contrast to the urban center. Essentially, the word transitions from a private asset (singular field/plural estates) to a public landscape (the rural surroundings). See: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=a)gro/s In the Gothic Bible, there are several references to fields, contexts that unambiguously refer to fields in an agricultural sense, whether in the plural or singular. For example, in Matthew 6:28: "And why do you worry about clothes? See how the flowers of the field grow. They do not labor or spin." In this passage, the Gothic Bible uses haiþjos, the singular genitive of haiþi. It is the ancestor of the English heath and heathen. https://www.wulfila.be/gothic/browse/text/01/06/28.html#S1097 Therefore, I insist, weihs designates either a village or the country in its geographical sense. Not farmlands. If weihs was translating the word 'farmland' or 'field', it would have been used at least once in that sense. There are about ten instances where the Bible unambiguously mentions one or more fields. Similarly, that's why current translations of the Bible distinguish between country and fields.

Mmh that sounds like it could have adverse effects.

https://youtu.be/EUNYxijiRLQ

For structures: a Greek "embassy" type thing for Persian. Units: a Greek mercenary spearman, a Greek mercenary swordsman.

Hi there! I am working on a mod that adds mercenary stuff (currently working on the "Ten Thousand" for the Persians). I probably wouldn't make that great of models for units and structures, would someone want to help by making the models?

@Obelix this is exactly what I was referring to - keep the discussion going - and sorry fo the wrong threat (bit off-topic) just spawned another idea...

I mean, that I don't see teams for players in the overlay

i.e.

Is this work around because of some coding limitations? Naively, I would think of normal bridges (the Persian was a particular case) as a structure that behaves like the port and the wall: start on one shore, finish on another (under certain depth/lenght limits), and the construction animation doesn't have to be that accurate (none is)... maybe there's some problem about walking on top of it if done in this way?

I don’t see any relevance in this line of argument. Proto‑Indo‑European dates back to the Neolithic; its origin is probably around 4000 BC, which means it is even further removed from Proto‑Germanic than Proto‑Germanic is from our modern languages. In this situation, we’re comparing things that simply can’t be compared anymore. The purpose of this discussion is to try to understand what vocabulary speakers of Proto‑Germanic might have used to refer to their settlements. The Cimbri migrations took place around 100 BC. I don’t see the point of going back that much further. And if you want to talk about the reconstructed PIE form *ḱóymos, it did indeed yield *haimaz in Proto‑Germanic, but it also produced κώμη (kōmē) in Ancient Greek and káimas in Lithuanian, both of which can be used to refer to a village. Kōmē is precisely the form chosen to designate the first phase (village) for Greek civilizations in the game… So it’s a bit inconsistent to criticize that choice on the grounds that the older PIE form doesn’t necessarily refer to a settlement. That’s really stretching the argument, and I don’t see the point of it. In your message, you criticize me several times for relying on place names that date from a few centuries after the Cimbri period, but in the end, you are constructing an argument based on reconstructions of a language that predates Proto-Germanic by several millennia. Once again, I don’t understand the point of your message. I never said that Old Norse or Old English was older than the other. I’m simply saying that the source you used (Lehmann) suggests that the word þurpą originally referred to a farm, and that the meaning “village” appeared later. In this discussion, the only reason to use medieval Germanic languages is to understand the semantic evolution of words from Proto‑Germanic onward. The context we’re interested in is Proto‑Germanic. In Old Norse, as in Gothic, the word derived from þurpą seems to have preserved its original meaning, that of a farm or agricultural estate. This supports my initial point: the meaning of þurpą in Proto‑Germanic must have been “farm.” And there is no doubt that Old Norse preserved the meaning of “farm” or “agricultural estate.” This is very clear in the poems of the Edda, especially in Hávamál and Vafþrúðnismál. In the Danelaw and in the earliest written records from Denmark, we see that þorps refers exclusively to secondary settlements that depend on a larger primary settlement. In those cases, þorps can refer both to hamlets and to isolated farms. We see the same thing in medieval Scandinavian law codes: þorp retains the meaning of “farm” as well as “village.” There is, however, a notable case in medieval Swedish law where þorp still means specifically “farm” in Old Swedish, which seems to have preserved this original meaning even longer. The evolution of the Germanic languages clearly shows this semantic shift from “farm” to “village.” It’s an understandable shift, since it follows the same pattern as Latin villa, which eventually gave the word “village.” I have taken the time to demonstrate that studies of place names generally indicate that -Heim was used in the oldest layer of place names. Without exception, these studies show that there were several periods characterized by different dynamics in the rules governing the naming of new settlements. It is clear that the trend involving -Dorf emerged relatively late, and this precisely explains what we observe in the various Germanic languages. There was a semantic shift that accompanied the social changes that transformed Germanic societies.

merged

@ThalattaThanks for this great idea for the Persians! We had some discussions a while ago about building bridges and could not really agree on how the bridge would be supported. Now if we could define a special ponton ship that can be linked in, say, up to 5 segments, then we might be able to create a bridge. And it can be destroyed like any other ship. Question is only how we could offer this as a possible option for path finding (topic: "objects you can walk on")

That would be awesome! I've been and hope to be adding more wonders and a capture mode would make good use of them.

Thanks for all these resources!

That's cool stuff to add to my bookmarks I'm not really into modding units, but maybe this web can be useful for you too: https://docs.wildfiregames.com/templatesanalyzer/