All Activity

This is really nice work, @Vantha. Thanks!

how jc must be feeling after any small inconvenience

Good news, folks! https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/pulls/8318

I found a list of free royalties sounds there, but just to try it out.

I think the biggest questions is: will the 0 AD priest chant Wololo?

I thought you were adapting A10 to A27.

@Classic-Burger Yes. Petra was introduced in Alpha 16 and it's not compatible. And I'm not "going to use" it, I'm already using it.

I found gold. https://github.com/0ADMods/convert_attack

How do I restrict classes? Or is that in the xml?

This will be useful to me later, I have problems relating the classes with the units to convert.

Everything makes me laugh inside. It's not that difficult to stop being yourself, you just have to know how you are seen from the outside.

This one is not new, but I saw it somewhere and thought @Seleucids might like that. Would you agree that it's not that easy to predict what anyone would consider funny? Do you ever actually laugh when watching funny images? Best I can really do nowadays is smile, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't appreciate good attempts at humor. Perhaps it's hard to come across something conceptually new and original as you get older. I thought I'd add a little more context for the non-technical people to better understand the joke, but it's a really big spoiler:

Are you going to use Qbot?

I have forgotten to change the class filters for the AI. It filters champions based on the old class token "Super", while all champions have class token "Champion". Why is this important? Well, the AI will make a weak army based only on the number and strength of CS units you have, while you might be having a bunch of champions. Not a very fun or challenging experience. To fix, change all mentions of "Super" to "Champion" in these files below. simulation/ai/qbot/economy.js simulation/ai/qbot/filters.js simulation/ai/qbot/military.js If you're making a Hero often, also add the "Hero" class token to the filter in "military.js" file. This bug was fixed in Alpha 10.

According to my research, I should use heal.js as inspiration. Then: In Age of Empires, conversion is probabilistic: a priest channels (with a minimum/maximum time), and there is a chance per interval that the unit will convert. Units resist based on type/technologies. In 0 A.D., we will use the "Heal" component as a base (priests heal allied units). We will adapt it to "Convert" for enemies: the priest approaches, channels, and upon success, changes the ownership of the enemy unit.

https://interactivepasts.com/mod-ception-the-player-developer-in-0-a-d/ 0AD is mod inside 0AD...

Maybe slingers ...*Wink wink*

If structure capture is nerfed, Sparta will need to have another way to destroy or weaken fortifications. Currently, their only option are rams. Which aren't ideal, to say the least.

It should potentially apply by splash, though I am unsure on the exact splash radius, its not something included in the unit details. That being said it does feel a bit to generic for a faction specific tech. Currently those who have bolters are Carthage, Athens, Sparta, Ptolomies, Macedonia and of course Rome. Macedonia is already strong so definitely not them. Ptolomies have machine gun level bolters(Cleopatra boosts fire rate even more) so not them either. Athens I am unsure where they are at, but they have a bunch of ranged options already. Carthage is very much in the same vein too, albeit weaker. That leaves just Rome and Sparta, two strong infantry civs with very lacklustre ranged capabilities outside of siege units which Rome has a significant advantage on. Sparta would certainly benefit the most from it given they have no catapults, flaming bolts on their bolters would certainly be an interesting alternative for building breaking. Rome already has the onagar, but the scorpio is also very iconic to them and they do go hand in hand I would say. They now have a strong theme of manoeuvrability which is cool, so that could be utilised instead. Given their known siege prowess one can definitely still make a case for flaming bolts or something though.

I think It could be considered as a unique tech or a unique unit for a civ. It would probably be very strong if the fire damage applies to multiple targets (splash).

Moin @kriko1978, willkommen im Forum. Neueste Version (27.1) und neueste Maus-Treiber setze ich mal voraus. Wenn @Player of 0ADs Lösung nicht funktioniert mach doch mal 'ne Suche im Forum: https://wildfiregames.com/forum/search/?q=mouse problem linux&quick=1&type=forums_topic&updated_after=any&sortby=relevancy&search_and_or=and Sonst kannst Du noch in den FAQ kucken, da findest Du auch die Datei-Pfade; die brauchst Du wenn Du Deine logs hochladen willst, bei Linux kommt's auch auf Geschmacksrichtung und Fenster-Manager und so an. HTH

Does the following work? Press the fullscreen button (maybe press it again) (maybe repeat this while shifting the window a bit if its not fullscreen)

Also Ptolomies should not have access to this tech on the grounds that their bolt shooter is not designed for incendiary projectiles and for potential balance purposes given their rapid fire bonus

That would also be the burning damage application, but yes

And do bonus damage to structures