Dakara

Some idea of bonus 1) When AGIS 3 is in garnison, all champions are train instant in this building. 2)AGIS 3 is cavalery now and he give bonus speed aura in medium range at cavalery ally by 3 points. 3)Agis 3 stop the production of ennemy building in a large area around him. 4)Agis 3 can put a flag on map ( max 1 flag in map.) he build it instant, this flag give 5 hp to all unit of the player in medium area. 5)Agis 3 stop all the healing in the area around him. Agis 3 is melee so it not op op, ennemy should put off combat Agis 3 if he want use healer. interesting combat mechanic, you have to adjust the range of the penalty aura.

Same i don't see problem about cav (except cav skirmish have 2 more damage than infanterie skirmish for exemple)

with auto que the corral don't need lot of micro. Except if you fail. It ok so. And you don't need 35/50 womans You can also mix field and corall.. im thinking corral is good and don't need change. No meta but can be used.

weirdJokes_vs_Dakara.zip

125 food and max 10 monks by temple built

it already the case no?

Why not slightly increase the attack speed without increasing the damage. To slightly nerf ranged units. By reducing the attack speed we reduce their dps and increase the overkill a little. Then we see the test and conclude. just for say : Ptol heroe reduce attack speed :p

it work but care at use yes so the solution is current

first, up sword damage against bolt and cata... 30 sword can't kill in less 30 second 5 cata... cata meta need counter

No change No change wall No change palisade, we can move easy army if we kill one part of palisade No change sword cav against wall or palisade

ONE FRENCH yessss

sorry was a troll ♥

I think website are dead

Do you like Nomad game? If not, how do you want them to evolve? I would love to hear your ideas, maybe someone will come here and incorporate them into a future version of the game. The goal is to make the game mode more enjoyable and diverse. 1)A few loose ideas: Research phase: For one minute you cannot build a building. This is to reduce the chance of good spawns and not to be too late if we chose to walk a little before building. 2)Then, the first city center is built 75% faster, in order to increase the pace of the game and compensate for the first minute of the game. 3)Use predefined resources so as not to disadvantage certain civilizations at the start, the resources at the start would be for example: 300 food 800 wood 800 stone 800 Metal SO it like 300 food 300 wood 300 stone 300 Metal after the CC built. Sélucide seems very advantaged but not very serious.... Sometime if no stone you can't build barack fast and you take late or can't make first tech. 4) Nomad ultra alpha mod : you start phase 2 with 40 population(10 womans 30 troops) and tons of ressource (like 1000 of each ressource= 1 cc and some building ), the goal is same but it more speed cuz good population and ressource and phase 2.

For Rome, i suggest keep their identity with no spear infantery at P1 but up the spear unit, rang 3 like skiritai for same cost as skiritai. Rome is pretty good infantery, we need feel it. Than add phase 3 auxiliaries unit (mercenary) : Archer infanterie and cavalerie archer and cavalerie sword (germans or gauls) and later special unit (like master dog or something, master bird for scout)

Hello me please i like bo1 but if rule it bo3..let's go lol

Hello, give my vote 1) We need more time to think to new bonus, a lot of idea are in forum. I don't really like wikipedia bonus just about % stats etc. we can find more fun. If we change bonus teams we need do it for long time , not for some month. 4) no understand so i don't vote 5) For me ram are ok, we need keep it can attack by melee unit without big difficulty. Add unit in for boost move speed is useless micro. no fun and no interest. If you want change ram (and orther siege) do it like 0 pop unit and can be move only by garnison, but we need big buff for siege for play them in most little number. 8) Agree with Majima, 1 tech for phase 2 and 1 tech for phase 3 is good. 2 tech in phase 2 or 3 that doesn't make sense. We need see again the cost of phase 3 tech military and maybe little utilitary tech in phase 3 (orther than damage and armor, like range? aoe dammage for melee? ) But for 9) BIG NO, why nerf the only heroe athens viable ? you know athens heros is good but you can't snipe with unit in formation? it broke armor bonus. We need keep good bonus heroe. And ptol heroe is not the most use, we need keep it. it good and fun strategy. And mercenary ptol is good alternative for play differently. 7) i like big cost on healer for don't create meta of healer, than my idea for druid britons is bonus team where druid are produce by 2 for same cost. big interest for create druide. With big cost , it give good advantage to produce druid.

Cheers, this player is handicapped, he can only communicate in this way, it is his way of existing and of inviting you to play as he would like to play in your place. We have to accept it and be handicapped friendly.

Hello, thank you for reporting these facts. I am sorry for the events that have taken place. Indeed, quite despicable people are not rejected by anyone because we need people to fill the games. While waiting for a more permanent solution in development, there is a mod to stop seeing messages from unwanted people. I don't really believe it but maybe this player could apologize to you.

So what the result?

no work i vote for delete you

Who assigns these rights? and what are the tools of these moderators? Should they be accountable? Maybe we could add 1 or 2 trusted moderators. they must then be accountable for the information they consult or the accounts they ban etc.

delete for reason : fake of someone

I think if the developers and the community feel that secondary accounts should be banned. 0.AD must reconfirm it. Otherwise we remove this rule and in the profile of the players it appears the year of creation of the account. Many players who make secondary accounts do not do so out of bad intentions. A rule not understood is a rule rarely respected. It is therefore necessary to better understand what bothers you in the use of secondary accounts. We are on the internet, a digital identity means nothing. Today I'm Dakara and in 2 months I can change my nickname. Besides, is it possible or not possible to request the deletion of a 0AD account from the lobby? --- Regarding this wall I don't really see the point, yes it's quickly fun to know who is hiding behind a secondary account. It's a little gossip, so ultimately useless information. The only interest in knowing who owns a second account is if this account has very bad behavior. And in any case, the hosts are free to ban them from their game. ---- But frankly it's far from being the major concern on 0AD. The games are more and more elitist, the players disagree with each other and the ddos is always present (we even start to wonder if it's not just the game that bugs). From my first games on 0AD so 2017 I used secondary accounts and I didn't do @#$% in my games. What I think irritates people the most is the feeling of not seeing the names of known players, they are potentially on a secondary account. The lack of reference. -- Insofar as the lobby is managed by USER1, he is the manager, he applies the rules he wants as long as they are written. But is it possible to change these rules? by making them softer or harder.

CARE steam update