wowgetoffyourcellphone

Why is this a poll question? Should not the art lead determine direction of the game's art and ultimately the quality of the work?

I have added the Thebans to my mod for those with the link and who wish to try them out. They are about 98% done. All I need to do is change the hero actors to be more unique, make a rally flag texture, edit some of the unit actors (change helmets, shields, etcc) and hmm, maybe a few more unique technologies (I am taking suggestions here). They have a siege workshop like the Macedonians, but unlike the Macks they have the fire raiser siege weapon I found in the game. I changed it a bit to work better too, kind of like a iberians fireship. Thebans get the Sacred band hoplite and Thespian black cloaks already in the game. The one unique tech I have for them so far is "Boeotarch" which greatly improves hero health. After I complete the Thebans I will try to add prop placements for the rest of the Fortresses. I may call for help in scripting to make only range infantry show up when garrisoned.

Is he going to be pantless?

It seems obvious that her draw is a quick draw for close enemies. But it is still a good animation.

I agree. Maybe have a Ptolemaic temple variation that is Greek. Also, isn't the military colony supposed to eventually look Greek (instead of like a mercenary camp)?

I would default to windows default dialog

Still many ways to make them Greek, but look with many differences than the current greeks.

chaos, just make the civ json files say: "SelectableInGameSetup": false instead of true.

Yes, I think her draw is aimed at an enemy at medium or close distance. In the game maybe we can have 2 or 3 animations, for 2 or 3 distances? A long range archer animation would look a lot different than when shooting at a closer targets.

LordGood, I think the seleucids stuff should look like a more super Greek style. I think this style you are making looks nice but does not fit game or seleucid.

I think this one looks good:

Yes you are right. That is the right material.

<material>player_trans_ao_parallax_spec.xml</material>

Wrong material in actor.

Great job leeper. +1 I think this would be ultimate goal?

This is a video game. Melee is represented by the hack statistics. Ranged piercing projectiles are represented by the pierce statistic. You would be able to balance a lot better if you just stopped fighting this.

It would be. Greek towers and fortifications would be square.

Why should melee units deal pierce damage, which is an analogue to projectiles like arrows?

haha you are right, but I think they use percentage for balancing styff.

I confirm this. Lots of errors that break it. However, this is still really cool for vanilla version ofg the game! Works perfectly with vanilla version.

I don't think that the current gaul buildings are too far different than what you have posted. Also remember that the artists like to make their mark with stylistic choices that are probably not always accurate 100%. I think it would help them if you maybe did a presentation of each gaul building in the game and show what you would change about each one to make it better. For the lether armor, that looks great. Good idea. Nice reference.

The trees would not disappear until the foundation is started being built. So, placing a bunch of foundations in the enemy's tree groves would not work to remove his trees. Besides, remember that you can only place foundations within your own territory (with a few special exceptions). Or just do what I suggest. lol Yes, but we want units to be able to walk through forests. Also, this removes possibility of doing cool things with barbarians in forests.