Lion.Kanzen

there is a patch, but I don't know why they don't pay as much attention to giving birth to that patch. in that patch you will be able to have 2 attacks.

you have to differentiate the storehouse from the farmstead.

???

Proconsul Although "proconsul" is an official title only with respect to magistrates of ancient Rome, the word has also been applied to various British, U.S., and French officials. In the modern context, it is rarely a compliment. The terms satrap (from Persian) and viceroy (from French) are both used in a similar way. Quaestor Is good option too. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaestor

could have another unit as tribune.

And this. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiliarch

This: Hekatontarch. Reforms in the late Seleucid and Ptolemaic armies re-organised them and tried to add some Roman aspects to formations. Stelae from Hermopolis show a Ptolemaic unit having a standard-bearer and other staff attached. This unit was like a Roman Maniple, being composed of two smaller units led by a Hekatontarch (i.e. a Centurion). The title of Hekatontarch appeared around the 250s BC in the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) which uses hekatontarchos (ἑκατοντάρχους acc. pl.) to refer to 'captains of hundreds' (eg 2Chr25:5). As well as this, Asclepiodotus describes in his 'Tactica' a new institution, the Syntagma, which had a standard-bearer, other staff and was composed of two smaller units led by Hekatontarchs. The Phalangarkhia, also described by Asclepiodotus, was about the size of a Roman Legion in strength. The potential Roman influence would have been great. In Ptolemaic Egypt, Roman adventurers and veterans are found commonly serving under the Ptolemies. Romans are found in Ptolemaic service as early as 252/1 BC. The Ptolemaic army was odd in that, out of all the Hellenistic armies, it was the only army where you could find Romans in Greek service. As Sekunda suggests 'such individuals would have spread knowledge of Roman military systems within the Ptolemaic military and political establishment' https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemaic_army

you would have to do that patch with several hellenistic civs.

I have thought that their have a melee attack and their standard attack(range). The armor thing makes a lot of sense, it will be the opposite of AOE.

They are missing colored ( player) props.

Mix both can work. if it depends on an artificial intelligence that receives and mixes all this data, in the long run it could be that we do use the same tags and represent the game.

I like the skill is very discreet. could fit here.

I'm talking about Alexander hero icon.

they should be less obvious with copyrighted material. There is an Alexander who is Collin Farrell.

I did a cavalry but they said it was horrible. That doesn't help wanting to make icons. I withdraw from that.

no, that's fine by dafault infantry.

or a single with perspective to the camera.

recommendation with weapons for example like pikes it is best to use a composition or an abstracted(this means that it was removed from a small detail) detail.

What is the difference in the role of chariots vs horse archers? In AOE one costs metal and the other is trash unit. In 0 A.D we already have trash units that do that in cavalry. https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Horse_Archer_(Age_of_Empires) May be anti support anti healers and villager. In AoE role: ""The Chariot Archer is a popular Bronze Age unit because of its combined speed, strength, range of attack, and the fact that it costs no gold, which makes it a so-called trash unit. Its speed allows it to fly right past towers and catch Villagers quickly. It possesses 7 range, allowing it to find exposed units or for reconnaissance. As it is fast and has good range, it is strong in numbers."" ----

This but with Tom's voice I don't know who else presenting the new features, the new content and announcements.

https://youtu.be/Zm0LjUBZyUY

her with... a solar crown.

many primitive nations made the brave warriors of spain and portugal to run in that era. @AIEND