Lion.Kanzen

but that wasn't outdated?

my map

basic information on the civ including how it should be played and its potential in each phase and Strengths and weaknesses. https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Palmyrans/Strategy That with the factions. With the units the basic stats.

If someone helps me I can keep the basic information. I'm a fan of the AoE II Wikia and I wish 0 A D had something similar. Even with strategy ideas from each faction.

necromancing this post. I think it would be better choice than steam for now or are we not ready yet?

City builder game mode you mean?

more ideas with balance changes. Or how to present them to the public. https://royaleapi.com/blog/season-36-balance-wip

This

that's the only counter in the game.

That's what I'm saying, we should improve the roles even if it's subtle, especially differentiating between similar units, like pikeman and halberd or club and axe and mace and axe.

I'm going to throw in the towel on this, I'm going to do it in my own mod and I'm going to change the licence. I'm going to change the icons and heroes that I don't like. but that's going to be a private project on Open Game Art. I have passion for this as an artist but not at the cost of 0 A.D. I will make my icons for my own benefit and for the benefit of any other project that wants to include them. i take this decision not to stop myself, i mean, if i do it in 0 a.d. it would slow down my potential. What I want is not to lose my passion and sometimes 0 A.D. frustrates me a lot. don't think bad. it's just like taking my own artistic path and leaving 0.ad as a hobby. I always dreamt of helping other games with less capacity and less fame. I can't find projects like 0 A.D I will do it in open game art. I see more need there than here. ______ if someone wants to help me close this topic.

the patch already exists (since A16) and 0 A.d has long since decided to drop Age of kings to be more of a hybrid.

The same goes for Parthians.

what an unpolite way of saying things. Sundiata was probably referring to invaders from Africa. The Babylonians never sacked Egypt or Conquer Egypt.

Teotihuacan (Aztec predecessor ) Hasmonean

Empire Earth 2 It allows soldiers to become Heroes if they get a certain amount of kills. These Heroes can form groups (called armies) with other soldiers and doing so enables all soldiers to become stronger. These officers could increase the stats of cavalry and infantry.

we could have a sub hero-class. For each hero 4 sub heroes.

there is a patch, but I don't know why they don't pay as much attention to giving birth to that patch. in that patch you will be able to have 2 attacks.

you have to differentiate the storehouse from the farmstead.

???

Proconsul Although "proconsul" is an official title only with respect to magistrates of ancient Rome, the word has also been applied to various British, U.S., and French officials. In the modern context, it is rarely a compliment. The terms satrap (from Persian) and viceroy (from French) are both used in a similar way. Quaestor Is good option too. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaestor

could have another unit as tribune.

And this. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiliarch

This: Hekatontarch. Reforms in the late Seleucid and Ptolemaic armies re-organised them and tried to add some Roman aspects to formations. Stelae from Hermopolis show a Ptolemaic unit having a standard-bearer and other staff attached. This unit was like a Roman Maniple, being composed of two smaller units led by a Hekatontarch (i.e. a Centurion). The title of Hekatontarch appeared around the 250s BC in the Septuagint (Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible) which uses hekatontarchos (ἑκατοντάρχους acc. pl.) to refer to 'captains of hundreds' (eg 2Chr25:5). As well as this, Asclepiodotus describes in his 'Tactica' a new institution, the Syntagma, which had a standard-bearer, other staff and was composed of two smaller units led by Hekatontarchs. The Phalangarkhia, also described by Asclepiodotus, was about the size of a Roman Legion in strength. The potential Roman influence would have been great. In Ptolemaic Egypt, Roman adventurers and veterans are found commonly serving under the Ptolemies. Romans are found in Ptolemaic service as early as 252/1 BC. The Ptolemaic army was odd in that, out of all the Hellenistic armies, it was the only army where you could find Romans in Greek service. As Sekunda suggests 'such individuals would have spread knowledge of Roman military systems within the Ptolemaic military and political establishment' https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemaic_army