Leaderboard

I'd like to add 2 thoughts to basic idea of this post. ( Let's ignore toxic behavior and lack of culture. Which is btw very important, especially in online communication when you can't actually see person's gestures and mimics which can lead to missundertandings.) (1) Vulcan: someone already replied. Performance and lag, especially in TGs is serious problem in 0AD. And devs really deserve to be highly appreciated for their volunter work. Not only on Vulcan... (2) Base idea of this post is to "prioritize tasks". It can be good approach in commercial projects, but in open-source where devs do it for free and for their own soul, that can be wrong sometimes. I think devs should have freedom to enjoy their "work" but off course, leaders must make sure that it doesn't ruin release game. P.S. 0AD is really nice project and huge job is already done and being done. Game is very playable so we should appreciate anyone who does anything to make it progress. Off course, I have many things I'd like to be improved so it becomes more competitive, but I am aware it's not simple.

It would be great if that were possible. For some reason I was imagining that I gained power(influence) to more people housed(garrisoned ) in the theater.

Those are just the box seats

Friendly 1v1 Community Mod Test (FCMT) tournament - when? Instead single elimination, let's make mini league with 4-6-8 players in each group so anyone can play few games before elimitated.

ok, I just figured out how to allow siege towers to benefit from targeting (with queueing and pushing to front of queue). https://code.wildfiregames.com/D4964 All thanks to the glorious @Isam f

Should have a 6000 garrison limit

I'm sorry, but I fear I neither remember nor know why I have been mentioned. Maybe I find time to do a trac research.

Mexico es bien dificil de jugar xd

I have an idea so that no one notices. Have you heard the paradox of Theseus? It's all about changing things so slowly that you don't feel the change until it's no longer 0AD, but rather DE.

Yes and not. In theory, DE should be the game's experiment laboratory.

I'm not privy to development stuff but surely 1,000s and 1,000s of bugs have been fixed across the numerous alphas. This thread is silly.

I have no recollection of this, but apparently it made a big impact on you, so I apologize. If I were to be made leader I would merge DE instantly and make everyone angry.

For me personally, performance has always been the biggest issue of the game. So for me, Vulkan falls more under the category 'enhancing playability' than 'adding new features'

Also I feel like many modern games would just call what we have a live service and charge a fee for each update.

games are not open source and only maintained by volunteers. it's an impossible comparison.