Forums
-
Welcome
-
- 5,4k
- posts
-
- 38,6k
- posts
-
- 16,9k
- posts
-
-
0 A.D.
-
- 51,1k
- posts
-
- 28,1k
- posts
-
- 48,3k
- posts
-
- 30,3k
- posts
-
- 45,7k
- posts
-
- 148
- posts
-
- 597
- posts
-
- Who Else?
- By AlexHerbert,
-
-
Who's Online 12 Members, 2 Anonymous, 1.576 Guests (See full list)
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
This hitbox you used are the model's bounds but aren't accurate to see what the unit collide with. It's my bad for not doing the obvious : adding a debug for visualizing the actual footprint used for collision. I was debugging mostly using boats to this time because they have everything more extreme than elephants : inertia, size, and they even have drifting effects. For them, the footprint is already accurately displayed when you select them, but now I added the debug so we can also see it for elephants. Also it made me realize that for boats it's fair to approximate their shape to a rectangle, but not so much for elephants who have different ratios, so when we spoke about corners, we highly exaggerated their extent for elephants : Yellow is the debug footprint. You can now display it by enabling Unit motion overlay and selecting the elephants. I'm convinced that a lone elephant pathing got better. He'll be more resilient to solving hitting a building corner for example. Lone elephant with other non-solids that used to block them it's even more obvious. I'm doing the tweaks I can to make herds of elephant not too terrible but they will always be less agile then normal units @real_tabasco_sauce do you think we could also slightly increase both their pop cost/res cost, and make them a bit more tanky? So that you get their new ability with micro but getting tones of them is still not as easy? -
.thumb.jpeg.67ef5b5dc6d918163efa04cd5336830d.jpeg)
By Nicolaus_von_Kues · Posted
Guys, in the next release you must clearly explain the change from alpha system to release system. Even though it might seem cosmetic, it sends the message that the project has reached a very high level of maturity. People take changes like that very seriously. -
-
Hey everyone, For the past month, I've been working on a project: a narrative campaign for 0 A.D., focused on Viriathus and the Lusitanian resistance against Rome. In-depth research, focusing primarily on Appian's *The Spanish Wars* Why : Because 0 A.D. clearly lacks a narrative campaign, and because the development faces significant technical and resource-related challenges. If this work can help the community, that in itself is a success for me. My goal : My goal is to create a story people will play, while discovering 0 A.D. But also to help the developers with my experience, through reports, and above all to create a reference for future scenario creation. For the past month, we've been working on the scenario. I already have 8 contributors on the project. Huge thanks to them. Release : The goal is to release Scenario 1. No official date yet, but I'll post an update every two weeks here, and also on Reddit. Also : This project isn't to release it as quickly as possible, but rather to ensure quality and also learn things like programming, digital painting,music, and collaboration. Thanks !
-
By Nicolaus_von_Kues · Posted
You should have arbitrary effects as a chaotic and random effect. When a price control effect occurs arbitrarily. This makes the market not an organic entity, but a regulated one. Someone or several people decide to take action to control prices. Especially the so-called trade war. In 301 AD, Diocletian promulgated the Edictum de pretiis rerum venalium, known as the Edict on Maximum Prices. The state set limits on a huge amount of goods and services, in response to inflation and prices that the government considered excessive. The preamble itself accuses merchants of raising prices even when there was plenty.
-
