seregadushka

Don't give advice you're not being asked for. And you won't get advice on where to go. I did not create this topic to listen to advice from users without proven qualifications. Which is the last thing I'm interested in. 0AD, I called your auto-queue shutdown annoying at the beginning of this thread. And they still have it, even if you post detailed instructions here. No matter how much you throw mud at ordinary users - "Learn to Play" - you will also get accused of being unable to create a pleasant game mechanism. The "Modern GUI" mod solves your mistakes even in simple button layout. What you should have done in the beginning. Rather than storing your mistakes for decades. And for the same number of years, you've been accusing users of a lack of intelligence, rather than admitting your mistakes in the UI. And this is my repeated opinion, after reviewing your answers.

fix 3 errors: 1. Units begin their action only AFTER their "Yes, sir!" This is a loss of 1 second. 2. Units do not start working on the field after it is built. 3. The unit works on the field. He doesn't notice when he's being attacked. He notices the arrows, but he doesn't notice the sword. It's stupid.

This makes you look like a cheater, If your have only question is to setup three barracks. Enabling auto-queue doesn't eliminate the resource supply. If you came to my topic to stretch it to 5 pages, so that even the developers refuse to read it, then you are a troll. Choose for yourself. Poking the barracks every 30 seconds is not a game, it's the job of an elevator operator. I want to manage the war, not the queue in the cafeteria.

I've posted the code here. which, as it seemed to me, solves the problem and my suggestion. He stayed here for 3 days. During this time, I have received enough training, treatment, and insults from my elders. Who, of course, knows all the 0 A.D. code and was born right on GitHub. And here's my answer: My code solves absolutely nothing. Because, obviously, it already exists in 0 A.D. I'm asking for a code that breaks the link between resources and this button. I can't get into 0A.D. 's head and show you where to cut. I'm telling you about my code now. Mind you, it wasn't you who pointed out my mistake to me. I found it myself. This explains how busy you are looking for a reason for self-regret, and not 0A.D. How highly qualified my interlocutors are. Both in the code and in the forum battles. Very low in both cases.

I'll answer again - you don't read the topic, just doing your PR. You are not a doctor to treat me. You don't have to explain to me how I feel about the game. You call it "failure to mismanage an economy", "Mistakes of managing" -- I call it an artificially created problem, I'll name it so that it's clear to everyone. This is not an original technique, not the latest mechanics. This is a game logic error. This mistake was made by the developers, consciously or not. And I'm asking you to fix it. At which construction site does the foreman sit on the floor, start crying and forbid the entire production to work if 1 brick was missing after lunch, even though a truck with 20 tons of bricks is already at the gate? And the foreman is waiting for the CEO, who will personally come and indicate which brick to continue working with. That's exactly what your KnowHow looks like in 0A.D. It's like calling the lack of wheels in a car a "driving feature." I have given an accurate description of the situation. What other amazing shapes can you come up with for this game story? Let me give you a psychological assessment: "you are ready to tolerate any absurdity, just not to admit the obvious." I've already said this 3 times, and I'll repeat it to you, if you only read your posts -- PETRA already has an Auto-Queue. I'm asking you to equalize our chances. And to save me from the interlocutors who need to be explained 3 times. If these are browser clickers too, then I'm not interested in them. Why are you calling me to your church? And drag 0A.D into it.

It is mentioned above about GitHub. According to your text, I see some kind of manipulation that gives you an open hater: Why do I have a "negative reaction" and everyone else has a "Respected opinion"? What kind of cheap dispute methods are these? Unconvincing to me. And now I'm going to show you how much you personally don't give a darn about what they give you. You don't read(or understand) the code, you don't look at the pictures. You're just looking for a reason to assert yourself at the expense of someone who actually offers improvements. I posted an important and beautiful picture. There are 2 complex concepts on it, which contain the whole essence of my proposal and this whole topic: "ON/OFF". These are 2 options. That's what I'm asking the developers for. Don't turn on "something" for me. And don't turn off this "Something" for others. There is both "ON" and "OFF" in my sentence. Лично вы, guerringuerrin , which option do you disagree with ?. I am waiting for a personal response from you.

What is it? I'm on the forum, not on GitHub. This is the third time. I say : I've been writing to the developers. And I appeal to them. If you personally have a "Developer" badge, then your texts will also have weight for me. I posted a picture, sample code, and most importantly, an idea to improve the game. This is already more than 90% of local visitors. But I got a lot of insults for not going through the whole "developer for dummies" path. Did I make a mistake with my profession because I didn't "write my own mod"? Do you know what a bug report is? I used to fill them out too. They are up to 2 pages in size, and all fields are required. Write in detail about the bug: "Before, after, during, what you want, what you see, what you should have, what you clicked, delete everything and put it clean, copy the logs, take a photo, edit the video, disassemble your computer, write the OS, processor and your biography." And at the end, get our salary. One item is optional. It doesn't take a lot of intelligence to create this questionnaire. Obviously, the survey authors are full-time testers. And the cooler the bug report, the less work they do. I know that there are organizations where they don't require a bug report and don't pin their work on users. They are developing their own ways of collecting statistics. Don't you notice anything like that? What the hell is GitHub? These letters should sound as desired. I've already made more than 90% of the users. Let's put it this way -- first I see my name on the thank you list, and then I'll think about GitHub.

I suggested making an option that would suit everyone. Just that, no more. But only those who have no influence on anything are gathered in the topic.

I don't allow myself in such aggressive attacks : "write your mod, code, the whole game." This is an attempt to humiliate. It's even worse if such words come from someone who thinks it's really a matter of 10 minutes. His level is clear. I have given examples when such "write it yourself" are heard only from illiterates. This is not the first time for me. My children's code is in JavaScript, but not in C++. Or can text suggestions be made only via GitHub?

I made a suggestion. And here psychologists are attracted by the magnet of free idleness, who convince "See clearly! Get rid of the filth ! You don't need it. Be a well-deserved clicker like everyone else. At a time when units were counted in abacus." You call it the preservation of traditions, the emotional component and the real hardcore. I call this the "lack of functionality and misdirection." If there are no other suggestions, then I will wait for the developers.

For now, you can relax. I'm not sure if you can handle my "face to face". I notice this trend: developers who can influence the decision of the raised topic are not on the forums. Because they just don't have any free time. But this time is a lot for all sorts of bedzelnik. And the dumber they are, the more often I hear - make your own mod. I suspect I know more about languages than you do. I often give simple code. The code is clearer to a competent user than vague options. I'm giving code examples that have been written for 20 years. And anyway, some idiot will come and say "write your mod". If I give the code, I'm not writing it to you! But to developers. I no need your advice and answers. I'll remind you. There is already a simple children's code in this topic for a preparatory group of developers. This is my code! Not yours. I didn't tell you to "write your mod". So decide for yourself which group you're in: the proposal givers or the dumb bums. The mod already has ModernGUI. This mod improves the GUI and does much more than Auto-Queue. I asked for a 10-20 line code solution that can be turned on and off. So, the solution is for everyone. Obviously, if a solution can be On/Off, by definition it cannot cause such resistance from loafers as in this topic.

You look like a doctor in a hospital for the mentally ill who came to earn his salary from 9 to 6 . You come up with arguments taken from the white ceiling of the hospital. That's why you go back to your room with a sign saying "doctor, don't change his mind, there is no cure." YOU gave out your diagnosis: an attempt to replace your limitations by reading new treatment methods for others. What else do you want to tell me that I do not know? Maybe you have an ABC of 0 A.D. for seniors? If you've read it, take it to the library instead of taking it to the forum. Don't waste my time. I know how I can use the time I've saved from endless clicks on the barracks. Without doctors, teachers, and older brothers who grew up on farm simulators. And now you're trying to turn 0 A.D. into a browser clicker. There are other activities in the game than opening sawmills, sowing fields, and twisting pig tails. Have I listed all your simple achievements?

It's interesting that you know of the two of us, where is a 0AD Sandbox, but I don't

Look at the browser's address bar and read the name of the forum. What is StarCraft, what is AOE? In the text, I see a full recognition of my arguments for the auto-queue in 0 A.D. because you don't have any others. For competent argumentation, like yours, not on the topic of the forum, the letters FIFA or Miner are also suitable. You weren't standing behind me, and you don't know what level of Petra I have set. You seem to be getting into the terms too. Based on the level of your comments, I'll also assume that you studied 0 A.D. from the pictures.

Bro, it looks like you decided to give a lecture at a nursing home. You've got the wrong address. Come back again.