All Activity

Please have a look on @Stan`s precise answer to this question in the thread 0AD on Steam? (last answer 1 hour ago).

Why not just get rid of the exit option in 1v1 games? Where the only option is "Resign"?

@Vantha has merged above-mentioned pull request with commit c799e4221a. Thank you all for the joint endeavour!

In theory it's possible, but this would require some work.

not that easy, dialog pages changed this alpha. Thanks, @guerringuerrin. Modern gui already updated this

IMHO, that would be a more consistent long-term solution. However, considering the technical challenges involved in implementing it, I don’t think it’s a bad idea to add this functionality in the meantime. (Correct me if I'm wrong but) It should be simpler to implement, would address a current need, and would also reduce the workload for the people who have to review replays in the Rating Disputes thread.

I have this set: ModernGUI > Settings > Options > Quick Start > Prepare Building > Farmstead After version 28 I noticed the farmstead would not build when placed. I have to manually reselect some units and tell them to build a farmstead a second time. Small bug. @Atrik

@user1 On February 21, 2026, the player goingloko ended a game without resigning just after I conquered his main civic center. My lobby name: King_Kreg Offenders name: goingloko commands.txt is attached. commands.txt

Both of these would solve that, yes. But I personally wouldn't mind too much if the host was treated more harshly than the client, as @guerringuerrinsaid they have more responsibility already and the main thing is that either side can't ruin the game.

Weird, works on my end. You have another mod enabled? Are you testing on the released version of the game or on the development version?

Hard crash

Out of curiosity, is making a .DAE plugin for Blender that runs on the latest versions on the table for you guys? It's a problem that is very easy to workaround at the moment as you only really need to go to an older version of Blender to get .DAE support again, but it would be nice to not have to juggle between different Blender versions whenever I want to work on art assets/mods for 0 AD :p

Which thing?

Host migration. or Dedicated Server. (lol, yes pl0x)

Ideally, yes, but I don't really see a way around it, since the client should be given the chance to reconnect, which isn't an option for the host.

Wanted to drop a quick update before i'm going on vacation. This is an unofficial release for A28, there are more features to come. What this version brings: update to A28 Germans got the grapejuice balance overhaul Fixed missing and wrong templates Some animations were missing, fixed Obstruction walls were selectable, they shouldn't be Exclude slingers from the brazier buff Rewrote the ammo system, should expect performance increase and less bugs Rewrote the energy system, should expect performance increase and less bugs rams don't get extra energy from garrisons anymore, they have their own standalone pool. Each garrisoned soldier adds to attack speed, damage and walkspeed as described in the "battering rams" aura tooltip. new icons for: re-arm aura, brazier flaming projectiles aura, field camp structure Units swap weapons much smoother now when out of ammo. Before, units would do the whole ranged attack animation until actually shooting to realise it's out of ammo, now they swap instantly after being out of ammo civic center shoots no arrows by default, only when garrisoned, to motivate players to build actual defense structures like towers and fortresses new tech at forge, upgrade stone towers and fortresses to shoot flaming arrows that apply burning added 3x damage bonus to spearman against cavalry, pikes still have their 5x bonus. ★ Units attack a random unit out of max 15 closest units in sight instead of just the closest one, meaning the battles- espcially big ones- are (imo) much more realistic and damage and ammo isnt wasted by dumping 20 arrows into 1 unit for example. Needs playtesting and feedback but from the huge battle tests i did i'm liking how it currently is. Might be my favorite addition to grapejuice if i can get it right. Things i'm planning to add before official release are: Abilities for units that cost energy. Charge attacks would probably become an ability too instead of automated like it is. Other abilities like "frenzy", increasing melee attack speed for a duration, a shout from an hero that gives a certain buff or pushes away enemies etc. Fix AI to use new units/buildings (it already uses new tech) Mini Quests that are given randomly through the game with some rewards when completed. Like capture a building from a certain player. And possibly other things from the planned features page. grapejuice_r13_A28.zip grapejuice_r13_A28.pyromod

MUST be brought to main game, this was teased since A26 community mod!! oh and where do I get delenda est for r28?

I'm just thinking the victory behavior should not change for the host/client.

During a MP match, the game state is always present on all clients. Essentially, all players run an ordinary SP game simultaneously, but receive the inputs from each other over the network. And each player simply "feeds" that input (received from the other players) into their own game instance and since the behavior of it is deterministic, all of the instances stay in sync. To be fully precise, it's not the mouse movement or button clicks that are shared over the network, but the game "commands" like moving or training units. What the host does in addition to that is manage the network connections to the individual players and e.g. letting them know when someone disconnects. Therefore as soon as the host leaves, the clients are cut off from each other, can't communicate, and the match is closed for everybody. With the proposed behavior, the disconnected player wouldn't lose anyway, as long as the other player(s) wait for him to come back. Could work I think, but might not be necessary. The problematic case is when clients leave when they're about to lose... then it shouldn't take the host too long to finish it anyway since they were about to win already, no? Depends on the victory condition, though.

This is my biggest hang up, and the resigning/ranking points issue.