guerringuerrin

AFAIK it happens sometimes. Just try again in a few hours

@Thalatta Your ideas about groups, formations, and battalions are very interesting. It’s true that in their current state they’re quite buggy and there’s too much overlap between them. I support your view that these features should be able to coexist as independently as possible, while also being versatile enough to let each player choose their preferred playstyle. Beyond the different possible ways to solve it, the diagnosis is very clear, and the general direction of the solution you propose is quite clear as well — it’s been a valuable contribution. There are currently some improvements in progress regarding formation behavior. I think that in the future, something along the lines of what you propose could end up being adopted. If a suggestion is well received, there is consensus among the development team, and there is time available to work on it, then it can be incorporated. Creating a dedicated post for a specific feature you want to propose is also a good idea. The more detailed it is, the better. You can include diagrams or mockups to make communication with other community members easier and, essentially, to build the necessary consensus. It’s also possible to contribute directly to the 0 A.D. repository either by writing new code or by reporting issues you encounter in the game: However, it’s important to keep in mind that submitting a Pull Request does not necessarily mean the code will be merged. It also takes time to get to know the right people and to become familiar with the dynamics of the community. Cheers.

I totally agree with you, double click on the idle worker icon to select all units make total sense and its much more intuitive. And yes, offscreen modifier is very useful! You can also use it to select all your buildings of the same type. That's because I forgot i had enabled this mod which makes your minimap bigger and also adds unit stats next to the unit portraits which are very useful. Is the second message, posted by @Atrik Of course, any idea you’d like to share is welcome, and I encourage you to do so. Naturally, many ideas don’t get implemented due to a lack of consensus or a lack of availability to work on them. I’m not a developer, but it’s worth pointing out that often ideas can’t be carried out simply because there isn’t enough time or enough volunteers who can dedicate themselves to them

Hey, @Thalatta! Thanks for sharing your suggestions here. I think some of them are very nice to have and I hope some day it will. I just wanted to share some answers about some of your suggestions that might help you. 2) if you mean select all of the idle workers you can achieve that by using the Include offscreen modifier hotkey (alt by default) and the Select next idle worker hotkey which i think by default is " . " but you can check it our on the hotkeys window. Mind that if you alt+double click, it will select all same untis including offscreen. To get the idle ones you need to use this hotkey combination. EDIT: Just checked. You can also alt+click this icon: 7) There is a Toggle status bar hotkey that covers the first part of this suggestions. I think is Tab by default. 8) You can achieve some of this with the next release of autociv mod. Also in the next release will be a Bird's Eye camera which set a top-down camera view. very nice to place buildings and develop your base layout. 15) Capture has been recalibrated for the next release and will be more difficult to achieve.

El primero parece Brasil, la Reserva Mapúa, el río Amazonas El segundo es de la Patagonia, América del Sur Muy buenos!!

that's cool, @stevenlau! looking forward to hear of any advance on this

Yeah! I was trying to find the PR bc i believe that was merged but at that moment I couldn't join gitea ( sometimes is like the css doesnt load and I see the web in text mode....) . I wanted to check if units will still attacking buildings if attack move is used and they find a building while moving or if they will only attack buildings when reaching destination and there's no unit in range

As Attack move also makes units to attack/capture buildings when they see it and Attack move(units only) attacks only units so the units doesnt get stuck attacking unnecesary buildings.

1) Yes. in Options > Networking / Lobby > There is an option "Max lag for observers". you need to set it to -1 (minus 1) so the spectators doesnt affect the game 2) IMHO. Yes and no. I believe It's more about ISP routing problems rather than distances. For example I mostly have some ping( ~300 ms) with some ppl from Asia, mostly from India but it's not everyone from India, just some ppl. And these same players with some lag with me doesnt lag with others in the same continent ( south america ) And I agree with this too.

"grain and fruit" would be even more accurate

IMHO one of the things that contribute to snowballing is the lack of hard -or stronger- counters between units. Agree with this too. I guess the difficult part is find the right balance to avoid encouraging turtling too much

Like the gaul trumpeters. would be nice for other civs to have some kinda musician that gives "moral booster" or something

This video es from an older version but will help you alot with the basics. Might not get much what is he doing but If you watch it carefuly more than one time and listen to what he says, you'll learn a lot

for 23/23b you need one of these

This is awesome, @Perzival12! Keep up the good work

I love this

Ok ok fair enough

@Vantha A call to make a tooltip for the loading screen

I think over time we’ve gotten used to a more easily capturable CC, and this has actually had a positive impact on the gameplay. Rams haven’t been completely discarded, tho. Maybe it could be made a bit harder than it is now, but I wouldn’t go back to the previous state. A middle ground could work better. I remember testing this adjustment some time ago, but I’d need to try it again to know if it was actually good. Personally, I prefer that it remains necessary to use soldiers to strengthen garrisons rather than improving civilians’ capture ability. As for the changes to the Carthaginians, it’s hard for me to give an opinion since I don’t usually play that civ and I haven’t tested this community-mod enough to form a clear view. What I would like to see, however, is a nerf to the fanatics so they stop being such a multipurpose unit and instead become more focused as an anti-cavalry unit. They should remain powerful but be more limited to fighting against cavalry. Something should also be done about champion cavalry, although to be honest I’m not really sure what exactly. =) Regarding the debate on the effectiveness of polls, I appreciate the spirit of your proposal, @Atrik. However, it’s difficult to get many players to participate in them, and the most active and experienced players usually don’t. I agree with @real_tabasco_sauce that, at the moment, using the community-mod to introduce changes and receive feedback is the most effective way to get results. Maybe we should start hosting community-mod games on a regular basis.

I understand. That doesn't happen anyway, even without investigating WickerBasket. Thanks!

Maybe, @Vantha can help me with this?

@Atrik Congratulations on this new feature. I think it’s a huge improvement to your mod since it allows players to quickly get familiar with the fundamental settings and, most importantly, it lets them see the changes immediately, which makes it much easier to explore different configurations that better suit each player’s preferences. I’ve noticed two things that might be useful to you: 1. When using this minimap style resizing is no more available. if thats intended maybe it will worht to mention on the Wizard dialog. 2. When using Queue in idle buildings first on Batch sizes doesnt show correct amount of units to be trained (similar behavior of my customtrainer old version) Also, it only allows 3 queue items per buildings but I couldn't find an option to set this number Btw, this is a very nice feature I'd like to port to CustomTrainer, right now my mod only prioritizes idle barracks but adds units to every building selected.

Thanks for your answer, @Atrik Yeah i've just checked and it doesnt make tech available for other civs when farmstead is captured. Only if that play didnt research Wicker Baskets already. So it looks like it's working good. Doesn't look like the correct way to accomplish this, tho

@Stan` @wowgetoffyourcellphone By removing "{ "civ": "maur" }" from "simulation\data\technologies\gather_wicker_baskets_maur.json", I was able to eliminate Wicker Baskets as a civilization-specific technology from the Civilization Overview section without breaking its functionality in the game (it still appears as a pair tech of Ahimsa and produces the desired effects). However, I’m not sure if this is the proper way to fix it. Could you confirm? Thanks Original file { "pair": "pair_gather_food_maur", "genericName": "Wicker Baskets", "description": "Equip your foragers with wicker baskets for foraging.", "cost": { "wood": 100 }, "requirements": { "all": [ { "tech": "phase_village" }, { "civ": "maur" } ] }, "icon": "gather_basket.png", "researchTime": 40, "tooltip": "Workers +50% fruit gather rate.", "modifications": [ { "value": "ResourceGatherer/Rates/food.fruit", "multiply": 1.5 } ], "affects": ["Worker"], "soundComplete": "interface/alarm/alarm_upgradearmory.xml" } Edited file: { "pair": "pair_gather_food_maur", "genericName": "Wicker Baskets", "description": "Equip your foragers with wicker baskets for foraging.", "cost": { "wood": 100 }, "requirements": { "all": [ { "tech": "phase_village" } ] }, "icon": "gather_basket.png", "researchTime": 40, "tooltip": "Workers +50% fruit gather rate.", "modifications": [ { "value": "ResourceGatherer/Rates/food.fruit", "multiply": 1.5 } ], "affects": ["Worker"], "soundComplete": "interface/alarm/alarm_upgradearmory.xml" }

@ffm2 I dont think it's about the usage of my ram bc I have 64gb and I usually play with everything closed. I'll start playing with the system monitor to check if the crashes occurs when the game reaches it's maximum supported ram for my system (which is 4gb, on win32 build)