Lion.Kanzen

The problem is that new players don't understand that mechanic. Not to mention is a suicidal move against with towers and fortresses. And No tutorial explain about this mechanics.

In the Argentine communities they are called Roberto. I never knew why. Sometimes it's part of the trolling. ------ (1 and 2 ) I don't understand the need to show the body on the internet. (Men and women). For some reason the new generations think that showing nudity is normal. I find it very bizarre how the internet creates certain behaviors. for a cleavage photo it is already scandalous. I know there is art, but most of the photos I see on the internet are not art. (3 ) it would be a poor security decision.

I've been asking for this for years. ITMS said no in those days. @Stan` Maybe you think differently. Capture must be a behavior that can be toggled on or toggled off.

I don't remember, I think it was a setting in the templates files.

Rebellions of the poors. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagaudae Bagaudae (also spelled bacaudae) were groups of peasant insurgents in the later Roman Empire who arose during the Crisis of the Third Century, and persisted until the very end of the western Empire, particularly in the less-Romanised areas of Gallia and Hispania, where they were "exposed to the depredations of the late Roman state, and the great landowners and clerics who were its servants".[1] The invasions, military anarchy, and disorders of the third century provided a chaotic and ongoing degradation of the regional power structure within a declining Empire into which the bagaudae achieved some temporary and scattered successes, under the leadership of members of the underclass as well as former members of local ruling elites. The name probably means "fighters" in Gaulish.[2] C.E.V. Nixon[3] assesses the bagaudae, from the official Imperial viewpoint, as "bands of brigands who roamed the countryside looting and pillaging". J.C.S. Léon interprets the most completely assembled documentation and identifies the bagaudae as impoverished local free peasants, reinforced by brigands, runaway slaves and deserters from the legions, who were trying to resist the ruthless labor exploitation of the late Roman proto-feudal colonus manorial and military systems, and all manner of punitive laws and levies in the marginal areas of the Empire.

got me thinking about the emblem again.

Demographic boost. one of the civilization bonuses is chinese/korean immigrants or settlers. Trained in the port. The demographic explosion of this period is impressive. [...]Many settlements in western Japan are said to have been moved up hill, that lacked large cultivation areas, at once in the latter half of early period to the first half of middle period in Yayoi period. Very good Farming. [...]Rice-paddy cultivation quickly spread across the Japanese Archipelago. People who created paddy fields made Yayoi earthware, in many cases lived in pit-type dwellings and built a dug-standing pillar building and a storage pit. Settlements had clear divisions between the living area and graves, and the village surrounded by a moat were excavated around the area of living. —may be a discount for fields (20%)— Defensive structure bonus. [...]In contrast to the previous period (Jomon period), it is believed that battles between settlements and regions occurred frequently during the Yayoi period. Moat settlements that have a moat around the settlement and upland settlements that were located at top of the mountain more than 100m in height are said to be evidence of battles between settlements. Weapon wounds on the recovered human bones (a human bone with trauma) also supported the evidence of war. Archer civ + Swordman. Similar to Maurya and Persian. Except for the cavalry obviously. https://www.japanese-wiki-corpus.org/history/Yayoi period.html

huh... well, it doesn't look so small, As I figured.

how does it look with the maximum zoom out?

what would be the demonym? Yamatians? If the name of the faction was Wa, should be Waians may be Waias? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wa_(Japan)

This topic is going to be to talk about the Period, probably more than one faction.

Yamatai-koku or Yamato-koku (邪馬台国) (c. 1st century – c. 3rd century) is the Sino-Japanese name of an ancient country in Wa (Japan) during the late Yayoi period (c. BC 1,000 – c. 300 CE). The Chinese text Records of the Three Kingdoms first recorded as Yamatai guo (traditional Chinese: 邪馬臺國) or Yemayi guo (traditional Chinese: 邪馬壹國) as the domain of Priest-Queen Himiko (卑弥呼) (died c. 248 CE). Generations of Japanese historians, linguists, and archeologists have debated where Yamatai-koku was located and whether it was related to the later Yamato (大和国). The Yamatai Kingdom had a system of laws, taxation and thriving trade agreements with outside kingdoms. These systems worked to maintain unity and prosperity until Queen Himiko’s death in 248. Famously, one hundred female and male attendants went with her to the grave. She never married and was without children.

Asian Diplomacy. According to the Book of Sui, Silla and Baekje greatly valued relations with the Kofun-period Wa and the Korean kingdoms made diplomatic efforts to maintain their good standing with the Japanese.[19] The Book of Song reported that a Chinese emperor appointed the five kings of Wa in 451 to supervise military Affairs of Wa, Silla, Imna, Gara, Jinhan and Mahan. Japanese records According to the Nihon Shoki, Silla was conquered by the Japanese Empress-consort Jingū in the third century.[21] However, due to lack of evidence,[22] this story is considered to be mythological in nature. It reported that the prince of Silla came to Japan to serve the emperor of Japan,[23] and lived in Tajima Province. Known as Amenohiboko, his descendant is Tajima Mori.[24] According to Kojiki[25] and Nihon Shoki,[26] Geunchogo of Baekje presented stallions, broodmares and trainers to the Japanese emperor during Emperor Ōjin's reign.[27] Korean records The Samguk sagi (Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms) reported that Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato court in exchange for military support to continue their military campaigns; King Asin of Baekje sent his son (Jeonji) in 397,[28] and King Silseong of Silla sent his son Misaheun in 402.[29] Hogong, from Japan, helped to found Silla.[30] According to the Gwanggaeto Stele, Silla and Baekje were client states of Japan. Korea says that part of the stele can be translated in four different ways, depending on punctuation and supplying missing characters.[31] The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences investigated the stele and reported that it reads, "Silla and Baekje were client states of Japan".[32]

Don't be surprised to see the kofun period intertwined with the Yayoi. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kofun_period [...]following the Yayoi period. The Kofun and the subsequent Asuka periods are sometimes collectively called the Yamato period. This period is the earliest era of recorded history in Japan, but studies depend heavily on archaeology since the chronology of historical sources tends to be distorted. The Kofun period is called the Yamato period by some Western scholars, since this local chieftainship became the imperial dynasty at the end of the period. However, the Yamato clan ruled just one polity among others during the Kofun era. Japanese archaeologists emphasise that other regional chieftainships (such as Kibi) were in close contention for dominance in the first half of the Kofun period; Kibi's Tsukuriyama Kofun is Japan's fourth-largest.

Scholar Controversy. The theory of mirrors being made in Japan On the other hand, because of the fact that no mirror similar to the Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was ever discovered in China and that some mirrors had the name of eras already changed in China or had nonexistent eras, there are theories that they were made in Japan or produced by the craftsmen that came from China, or they were made in China and loaded on a ship destined to Japan or they were modeled on Chinese mirrors and produced in Japan. Discussion about the Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror Because Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors were discovered mainly in the Kinai region, many researchers advocating the Yamatai-Koku kingdom in the Kinai region maintain Himiko's mirror and many researchers advocating Yamatai-Koku kingdom in Kyushu region maintain the mirrors were produced in Japan. However, some researchers maintaining that the mirrors were produced in Japan advocate Yamatai-Koku kingdom being in the Kinai region. Some of them advocate that the Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was produced in Japan by craftsmen and others in the Wu dynasty (Three Kingdom) in celebration of Himiko's dispatch. On the other hand, researchers advocating the Yamatai-Koku kingdom in the Kyushu region consider the all Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors were be forged by future generations (though the name of era in Wei dynasty was inscribed on them.) Researchers advocating that the mirror was produced in Japan point out the following questions while those advocating Himiko's mirror disagree. Questions It doesn't chronologically match because Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was discovered only in a tumulus after the fourth century, never in tombs after the third century which corresponds to the era of the Yamatai-Koku kingdom. No Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors have been discovered in China and Chinese scholars say that it is not Chinese. There is the mirror with the inscription of the name of a Chinese era which didn't exist after the change of the era. Though 100 bronze mirrors were given to Himiko as an imperial grant, many more Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors were discovered. Counterargument No Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors were left in China because it was specially made for theYamatai-Koku kingdom. The third year of Keisho (239) was the year when the month of the New Year of the fourth year of Keisho was regarded as being after December, which showed it was a time of turmoil. Later, as well, Himiko was given bronze mirrors several times. Against the argument that Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was discovered only in tumulus after the fourth century, it consistently shows that this mirror was made in the Wei dynasty because the beginning of the Tumulus period was moved up to the third century and it was discovered in the tumulus chronologically in the third century due to the recent study results of the chronology in annual rings. That mirrors inscribed with 239 and 240 were also made in those years is understandable without question. On the contrary, the theory that this mirror was not related to the Yamatai-Koku kingdom despite the name of the era as maintained by researchers who advocate Yamatai-Koku kingdom in Kyushu region is rather inconsistent. Though there is no crucial evidence to determine whether the Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was made in the Wei dynasty or in Japan, it is one of the compelling evidences of the Yamato theory of the Yamatai-Koku kingdom because the mirror inscribed with the years 239 and 240 can be considered to be mirrors from the third century as seen when counting years according to the accepted view of chronology in recent years. There is little doubt that the person who made the mirror wanted to use the name of Wei for some reason.

About the Mirror. The theory of Himiko's mirror Based on the story that the princess of Yamatai-Koku kingdom, Himiko was considered to be dispatched to the Wei dynasty and according to a description in the Chinese history book "Sangokushi" (Three Kingdom Saga - history book) 'Gishiwajinden' (literally, an 'Account of the Wa' in "The History of the Wei Dynasty") that in 239 the Emperor of the Wei dynasty (Three Kingdoms) gave a hundred bronze mirrors as an imperial grant to Himiko, there is the theory that Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was the said mirror and it was produced in the Wei dynasty or Rakuro County or Taiho County (ancient counties that existed in the northern Korean Peninsula) in the Korean Peninsula. When Shinjukyo (the mirror engraved divine beasts) was discovered in the Tsubaiotsukayama-kofun Tumulus in Yamashiro-cho, Kyoto Prefecture (Kyoto Prefecture) (currently, Kizugawa City) in 1953, Yukio KOBAYASHI focused on the fact that the same form of mirrors were discovered in the various places in Japan and advocated Yamatai-Koku kingdom located in Yamato and the process of the establishment of an ancient government that Shinjukyo granted to Himiko by later Yamato sovereignty (the ancient Japan sovereignty) were given to Gozoku (local ruling family) in the various places. However, some people say that it is impossible to imagine such a dynamic process with the distributing the same form of mirrors. Recently, the case of many Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirrors buried with a dead person in the Kurozuka Tumulus in Nara Prefecture was clarified, which reflected that the Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror was not so uncommon amongst buried people.

I'm thinking about the mirror, but I don't think I can do it alone. https://www.japanese-wiki-corpus.org/history/Sankakubuchi Shinjukyo Mirror.html The plan is do the usual since the Athenian emblem, so that it doesn't look ugly, give it a background color. I need those figures made in drawing.

Imagine if it includes intermediate colors. Indigo, Magenta, Aqua, Salmon.

The previous one, which marked the era, was the collapse of the Bronze..From Assyria to Rome.

typical world collapse.

representations of late Rome have grown quite a bit. What I have read is that the military change in the third and fourth centuries was very abrupt. even in the reliefs the change of note.

And Persian pants.

Me too, but altogether it's weird. What I have seen with that clothing is different. Knowing the Roman mentality, only the high ranking patricians wear Hellenistic armor. The most common is to see germinized or orientalized full armor.

The only thing I doubt is the shin guards (Greaves). illustrates kind of odd and peculiar this artist.

I found a kind of historical reconstruction. It looks like a later period but, the details of the materials are fine. It looks like medieval or late antiquity of Japan. Kofun-Yamato. there are many details that it shares with the Yayoi period. The war paint, the ribbons on the pants. https://isuzugawa.ti-da.net/e5872420.html