Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wanted to ask if it's possible in the next alpha to fix this bug, that allows to the player to build multiple strats of walls in the same place. Pls stop this that makes always @Hannibal_Barca invincible on some types of maps -.- 

screenshot0219.thumb.png.0389b968648e6b83626c45a30e62b32a.pngscreenshot0218.thumb.png.feee5dabadc3fe760024e2962116089d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought usually MP Ranked games had a "No wall allowed rule" ?

I don't think it can be fixed though. You can't really put a position restriction for walls... Nor a Max number of wall pieces...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, stanislas69 said:

I thought usually MP Ranked games had a "No wall allowed rule" ?

With the new alpha 23 there are no more rules. Walls are part of the game and of the fun, and it's sometimes annoying this bug, cause it allows to some players (that maybe are weaker in game than you) to win for example a wonder or relic game

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While fixing this particular thing maybe easy, it would come with major regressions. Pretty sure, it would make actually building walls a nightmare. That is unless a smarter way could not be found of course.

Stacked walls now...that Hannibal always trying to find the next bug exploit :-P

Edited by (-_-)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jofursloft said:

Building multiple walls on the same place is cheat 

I agree. It is easier to cover all side and it takes less space. It is not the same than successive walls.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Jofursloft said:

With the new alpha 23 there are no more rules. Walls are part of the game and of the fun, and it's sometimes annoying this bug, cause it allows to some players (that maybe are weaker in game than you) to win for example a wonder or relic game

Any particular reason for there being no more rules ? Just curious.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, stanislas69 said:

 Any particular reason for there being no more rules ? Just curious.

I personally don't know. I "was born" where people were even fooling around if they player with cavs, bolts, siege towers or walls. So I was really weirded when alpha 23 was released because I had to learn again how to play in 0ad, and it wook me a lot of time. So, I really don't know why we passed from a rule-based alpha to a everything-free new alpha. ANyway, I personally prefer games with no rules, because they are more realistic and also more funny 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jofursloft said:

ANyway, I personally prefer games with no rules, because they are more realistic and also more funny 

Sure, makes sense :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, stanislas69 said:

Any particular reason for there being no more rules ? Just curious.

Things got more balanced. Previous alphas there were some definitely unbalanced parts. Those were ruled out. A23 seems to have a lack of clearly op things. (Besides a mass of catas and bolts maybe)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Imarok said:

Besides a mass of catas and bolts maybe

Mass of catas and bolts are surely op, but remember they need a lot of time and resources to make, so I don't think we have to work in this direction, but to fix some thing that are clearly op in games like 1v1 or team games in mainland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/4/2018 at 10:15 PM, Jofursloft said:

Mass of catas and bolts are surely op, but remember they need a lot of time and resources to make, so I don't think we have to work in this direction, but to fix some thing that are clearly op in games like 1v1 or team games in mainland

so stacked bolts are less op than stacked walls?

 

9UEXMFg.jpg

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, thankforpie said:

 so stacked bolts are less op than stacked walls?

Yes. Something like 12 walls on the same place are OP because behind you can put a large quantity of catapults to destroy attacking bolts for example, while the enemy takes a lot of time to destroy them and your units a really low time to build them

I appreciate a lot the question mark man anyway  XD

Edited by Jofursloft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/4/2018 at 2:43 PM, Jofursloft said:

I personally don't know. I "was born" where people were even fooling around if they player with cavs, bolts, siege towers or walls. So I was really weirded when alpha 23 was released because I had to learn again how to play in 0ad, and it wook me a lot of time. So, I really don't know why we passed from a rule-based alpha to a everything-free new alpha. ANyway, I personally prefer games with no rules, because they are more realistic and also more funny 

We can called handicaps or challenges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could add a minimum angle restriction between the newly placed walls and those already connected to the same tower.

What about limiting access to stone when the game advances (Yea, but slingers/catapults/... ;/)? Though a minimum angle definitely makes sense to me, too.

 

A more personal request of mine would be to use the words "bug" and "cheat" more specifically - for they have a meaning and are useful in communicating game development. So please mind your words - and if only for my mental stability ;p

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A minimum angle should depend on the wall size I guess. But, I think a better solution would be to find the missing placement check. I couldnt find anything in the commit logs, but I still get the feeling it was a wall placement patch introduced kinda recently. It fixed placement after another bug prevented walls from being built entirely.

Edited by (-_-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, (-_-) said:

A minimum angle should depend the wall size I guess. But, I think a better solution would be to find the missing placement check. I couldnt find anything in the commit logs, but I still get the feeling it was a wall placement patch introduced kinda recently. It fixed placement after another bug prevented walls from being built entirely.

The problem is, that we have only three distinct wall lengths. To allow arbitrary lengthy walls get built, without letting units through, we have to allow overlapping walls.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/4/2018 at 9:39 PM, stanislas69 said:

Any particular reason for there being no more rules ? Just curious. 

scythetwirler had changed siege engines to be much more effective in Alpha 21 or so. It was mentioned in the trailer. A23 is indeed the most stable balance I played so far (still imperfect in various ways).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that my latest exploit hit the news.

It is true that it is a bit unfair, since I started using this strategy some players call "gg" upon me building a wonder/capturing the relics. :rolleyes:

 

@(-_-) it is true that I always try to keep myself up-to-date, leading the fashion in 0 A.D. bugs and abuse is what I do.

Nevertheless, one could argue that this effective bug detection and its subsequent systematic abuse will drive people who play with me to campaign to get the bug fixed ( @elexis ).

Numerous game weaknesses (not just game exploits) have been unearthed in such a fashion, leading to the overall improvement of the game!

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×