wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted June 14 Report Share Posted June 14 On 12/06/2024 at 3:34 AM, Dunedan said: The "Demo campaign - new maps" campaign doesn't include a single scenario and is therefore unplayable. https://code.wildfiregames.com/D5289 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted June 16 Report Share Posted June 16 "Ships" should be moved to the front of the list IMHO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted June 17 Report Share Posted June 17 lol Spoiler Finishing a CC and winning coincided. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obelix Posted June 19 Report Share Posted June 19 On 17/06/2024 at 12:35 AM, Gurken Khan said: "Ships" should be moved to the front of the list IMHO. Should have been fixed with r27779. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 I still don't like that they're called Stone Throwers in some places and go by a different name in others (for example the arsenal, where you build them). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
real_tabasco_sauce Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 2 hours ago, Gurken Khan said: I still don't like that they're called Stone Throwers in some places and go by a different name in others (for example the arsenal, where you build them). In this case, stone throwers refers to both catapults and onagers. Although there may be other cases where the terminology could be better. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 20 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said: In this case, stone throwers refers to both catapults and onagers. Although there may be other cases where the terminology could be better. I'm thinking we should just standardize it to "catapult." Onagers are catapults, in the broad sense. "Stone throwers" might be needlessly pedantic and "catapult" is a term most people understand. "Bolt shooters" though seems to be a good term for scorpions and oxybeles. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted June 20 Report Share Posted June 20 28 minutes ago, real_tabasco_sauce said: In this case, stone throwers refers to both catapults and onagers. Ah I see, it's a generic term/text. (Like every arsenal - no matter the civ - tells you that you can train champion infantry crossbowmen there...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultimate Aurelian Posted June 21 Report Share Posted June 21 (edited) 6 hours ago, wowgetoffyourcellphone said: "Stone throwers" might be needlessly pedantic and "catapult" is a term most people understand. This is indeed the modern perception of a catapult (A siege engine that launches stones). But in antiquity the term catapult was also used to describe bolt shooting engines. Personally i think stone thrower is a better term since it is more accurate; but still easy to understand. Edited June 21 by Ultimate Aurelian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 Clearly the neon glow is a design choice (Kurus isn't the only one with it), but I'm not too happy with it; when I saw the small version in the structure tree I thought the file was damaged. Also what's up with his headgear? Does it only have a small lobe on the right side? I feel his face should be covered in shade and there's too much free space next to his neck. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted June 23 Author Report Share Posted June 23 Sadly the person who made them has since then left the forums and all their posts were deleted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 32 minutes ago, Gurken Khan said: Clearly the neon glow is a design choice (Kurus isn't the only one with it), but I'm not too happy with it; when I saw the small version in the structure tree I thought the file was damaged. Also what's up with his headgear? Does it only have a small lobe on the right side? I feel his face should be covered in shade and there's too much free space next to his neck. You can tell this one is AI by the look of his hands. jk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted July 20 Report Share Posted July 20 (edited) I know the visibility of minerals has been improved over time, but maybe we can help it even further. This is on Ngorongoro, and I had a hard time locating those things. (Especially since I'm not very good at aligning the colored dots on the minimap with the features in my line of sight.) You all see the second metal and stone? This is the normal view, not the darkened pause view. Are these the latest materials? Do the effects work on this map? Edit: We're still using this tall grass? (Ambush) Edited July 21 by Gurken Khan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted July 25 Report Share Posted July 25 I think the portraits of the iber heroes also all look like they've been radioactively damaged. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 I think this volcano (Dodecanese) looks really off. Besides the various straight lines, the hot top seems unnatural; I've just read the wikipedia article about eruptions and looked at numerous pics and it only confirmed my impression. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wowgetoffyourcellphone Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 On 23/06/2024 at 8:46 AM, Stan` said: Sadly the person who made them has since then left the forums and all their posts were deleted. That one wasn't my fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted July 28 Report Share Posted July 28 I thought it was fixed that women can't see the theater they're working on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted July 28 Author Report Share Posted July 28 Never has been, many such cases. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 Don't think this should happen. savegame-1255.0adsave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted August 7 Author Report Share Posted August 7 Do you have a replay per chance for the seed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 No, the save is all I got. Can you get the seed from that? Is there a way to force a replay to be generated? Resign or play a minimum of time...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan` Posted August 7 Author Report Share Posted August 7 Maybe haven't checked into the save file (it's a zip) how come you have a save and no replay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 31 minutes ago, Stan` said: how come you have a save and no replay? Because I manually saved and there was no replay generated automatically. I mentioned it ITT before (to no reaction) that when I pause (&save) and leave the game at 00:00 play time there is no replay; when I load that game and play to the end the generated replay is rubbish (as is standard with fragmented replays). Allegedly it's possible to merge partial replays, but when that 00:00:00 moment is lost... When you get around to it, please let me know if you could retrieve the seed from the save as it will impact future reports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted August 19 Report Share Posted August 19 (edited) Traders are just stupid this version. I didn't hear anything back about traders losing their route when they were garrisoned; I really hope that gets figured out. Edit: My initial complaint in this post seemed to be invalid... Edited August 19 by Gurken Khan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurken Khan Posted August 22 Report Share Posted August 22 Insolence! Insubordination! My guys just skipped their first order and went straight to the second objective. (They come out of the barracks at 7:24, should anyone want to look at the attached replay.) I thought maybe it was a singular occurrence, but yesterday some other guys decided to skip building a barracks and went straight to chopping wood, again ignoring their first objective. Don't think I had that behavior before, now I had it two consecutive days... 2024-08-20_0003.zip 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.