Emacz

}, "requirements": { "entity": [{ "class": "Village", "number": 25 }, { "class": "Town", "number": 2 }] }, i did this with no errors, but it went right to p3 after p2

wouldn't u need another comma after the last } before "requirementsTooltip": ? Ill tyr both! thanks

Does anyone know if its possible to have p3 cost X village buildings + y town buildings? Below failed }, "requirements": { "entity": { "class": "Village", "number": 25, "class": "Town", "number": 2 } }, "require

Ok so probably an issue with lobby, maybe just for windows or for all players.... Maybe they fixing some of the issues already going on with a27?

Anyone else having an issue logging into multiplayer lobby? 6:46pm EST. Been going on last 30 minutes or so, have had to play single player

what am i supposed to do with that?

Wont ban them on historical That is if I can figure out how to bring everything over to a27!

Thanks, was having this discussion on the historical discord server, and we all agree on running/acceleration. and regular movement is just walking. Making it realistic or at least the ratio between the two though start to create problems. Since running only happens in those two situations, it doesnt make sense that a horse would cover the same distance across the map only a little faster than human. You would almost need to add in stamina or something that might make it way too complex, so now just trying to find the right balance where cav mobility isnt too op, especially for civs with limited, weak cav.

Can someone explain to me a little more how these three movements work? I feel like most of the time units always walk, its only when you try and gather them to formation do they run. Am i missing something? My understanding is the average human walks 3 MPH while horses only walk 4 mph. It running where they have the big advantage most horses can run an average of 30mph, while Usain bolt can get up to 27.3 MPH, its only for a couple seconds Just something Im thinking about for the historical patch.

ahaha oopps im blinde a27 was wishful thinking

i get connection to server rejected A27?!?

I kinda of agree. Pretty sure i suggested somewhere a ranking system similar to Starcraft 2. But I agree it will be harder with a small player pool.

historical mod, i dont think geratrix is there yet its mostly only played by small group of known players.. I have more thoughts on this topic in general and will add later if i remember.

Yeah i actually like this more, but im not srue how to implement it. Palisades have resistance, but not "extra" for cavalry.

Arnt you the one who said that too many aura's slow down the game though? But yes, quick simple fix! Thanks

Im still somewhat new to the modding, but wondering if palisade could do 1 damage every3-5 seconds with same change as spear cav, then apply a huge bonus against cav, so if cav get too close to the palisades they get seriously injured, but infantry (since they take up less space and are a little more maneuverable would only take a very small amount of dmg and could destroy the palisades. It's something I would like to maybe play around with in the historical patch if people have ideas on how it could be implemented and work as intended

maybe we should try and combine some of the best features from a couple mods

thanks, yes always looking for new players and ideas! and new link is: Emacz2/Historical-rebalance-patch: Mod for 0AD

Defintiely agree with smarter AI for SP. And again I still like more of a "starcraft" approach to MP. right now there are too many unknowns, smurfs, multis ect... this wont be completely fixed with a new model, but if somehow your rating/ability can be calculated better regardless if you dont play rated games and you can be put against players around your ability it would me more attractive and fun. I remember one of my first games against borg 6+ yaers ago, I lasted less than 3 minutes and was so annoyed at his cav rush and thought it was so OP, but mostly cause i didnt realy know how to play the game yet and playing him was one of my first MP experiences

I think walls/forts and maybe ccs would be good. But yeah they were mostly used for gettting over walls into cities/castles.

ah ok, maybe... but maybe this is OK and a little less turtling?

Siege towers? Again I think if we changed the purpose of them a little, maybe make them harder to kill, but do less dmg lower range but somehow help them capture forts and ccs.... and they could get a slight speed boost.

I like the ideas and am going to try and incorporate them into the historical patch Im working on. I defintely could do somethign where certian buildings have an movement aura around them. Not sure I could create "roads" per say. Also don't know if i can get it to effect own and allied units. Something to think about and work on!

Is the battering ram aura something that is coming out in a27? The increased speed based on garrisoned units!?! That's something i suggested a while back. I dont know how to work that in yet though. Still too nub at this coding thing.

I like the roman roads tech. I'm wondering if there is a way to do somethign similar as a teambonus but only in allied territory. For example maybe a secondary team bonus for rome and allies is all units 2% faster movement within allied territories. Any idea on what that might look like in a script?