All Activity

You know .. the ice house .. the Yakhchal

Can confirm, thats what I do late game from observing players. Thats.. quite an exploit, might as well set global limit, having more doesn't benefit the player. Me with 50 cows and on the other side a penguin nirvana about 50(I don't even know what ice house is).

It's a good thing that it gives the thing it costs. If i trade, I start to set the trade on 100% metal to finance the training of traders until they are enough. So I see 1. more as a pro corral argument. The corral training tech. It slows the investment down, so one can invest more of the gains the current cows are giving. This is not a important point though. It is more micro, but not much. You can do it in a non-crusial time of the game. It is also a set and forget thing. Just place a coral at some time, Just activate auto-training, set a way point on the ground next to the corral, set a way point on the corral to garrison. So its something like ~5 clicks. The cow production stops automatically if there are 50 cows. The value of food varies during the game very hard. Since populating up is a extreme high priority one make >10 fields. Then when you reach pop cap, the value suddenly drops, while you still have the farmers on the field. The best use is to be the first at the market then and converting it. But then when the game drags on it's best invested in the corrals to free up the pop of the woman on the fields. Persians sure can do both but it's advisable to do the less efficient one later when the efficient method is fully exhausted. Just for note there is also a little trick possible, build a house as extension of your territory, build the 5 ice houses as the extension. Delete the house. Let the ice houses go to gaia. Build 5 new ice houses. Capture the old 5 ice houses back. Interesting for the "survival of the fittest" game where the Persians are OP.

rc 5 works good! cheers, Bernd

"Charisma" aura: All nearby enemy units -20% speed and -10% attack.

RIP Video

Wasn't Alcibiades like, err, "roommates" with Socrates? Think I had some "encounters" with him in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

make alcibiades bonus smth like "conqueror of charisma: all enemy women get pregnant and lose resource gathering rate by -30%" also yes,I support more heroes just for regicide but GIVE THEM SOME BONUS. AND AGAIN, XENOPHON HAS SUPER OUTDATED STATS

Not to mention that the game can barely manage the amount of players it currently has. Imagine the number of "disconnected to cheat the rating system" posts we'd be inundated with? There needs to be several solutions to several problems with multiplayer and we haven't scratched the surface. We still haven't resolved the issue of macro mods. Imagine throwing thousands of more n00b players into the mix.

This is an important one and the first thing to come to my mind when reading the OP. Passive bonuses, even if not as "lucrative," are generally better because one can use the APM you'd use on a corral for something else. An Ice House is a "build it and forget it" feature. Not so with a Corral. Similar to the difference between a Global aura vs. a Ranged aura for heroes. Global auras should always be weaker than Ranged auras, and vice versa.

Athenian Hero Roster. Guess who they are? I think it'd be fun to add a bunch of other, non-trainable heroes to the game, if only for the Herocide game mode. Alcibiades, Aristotle, and Demosthenes would be great examples.

A first draft, some names are quite difficult to interpret in Proto-Germanic (PGmc) Historical names Etymology Meaning PGmc reconstruction Claodicus *hlūd- + *īk- "Powerful through his fame" *Hlūdagīkaz Caesorix *gaizaz + *rīks "King of the spear" *Gaizarīks Teutagonus *theudō + *gunthiz "People's battle" *Theudagunthaz Cotto *kath- / *kott- "The fighter (diminutive)" *Kottō Deldo *dal- / *del- "The shining one or the sharer" *Deldō Atès / Atas *attō "Father (honorific title)" *Attō Nasua *nas- "The one who has a (large) nose" *Nasuō Cimberius *kimbra- + *-jaz "The one of the Cimbri" *Kimbarjaz

Iterated

yep, I don't mind either @Vantha.

see also

Buenos días ,tardes o noches: -Aquí les dejo un avance de los bocetos de todos los mapas Asiáticos de Tipo Escenario: (¿Pueden adivinar a que parte del mundo son ?) Desculpen las molestias*

I don’t know much about this stuff, but I feel like the technical challenges of a big player increase might be underestimated, especially given the current resources behind 0 A.D. It’s not just about getting more visibility, scaling and maintaining the infrastructure is a whole different challenge.

I’d love to see it happen, mostly for easier updates and more players finding the game. The server part would need planning, but the idea feels possible if the team wants it.

@wowgetoffyourcellphone's and @real_tabasco_sauce's call I'd say, since they worked a lot on the civ and know the vision behind it. I personally, though, wouldn't mind if they aren't from Cimbrian Wars, as long as the characters are still Germanic, from about 0ad's time frame and ideally also historically relevant or interesting.

Try refresh multiple times.

Login also appears to be broken? Or at least not working properly for me.

Hi, when I try to access the gitea instance for 0AD, the styles appear to be broken (see attached screenshot). Is this a recent breakage and any plans to fix it?

I'd like to return to this point because I've noticed my message wasn't understood. When I say that Euler represents a school of thought from the mid-20th century, I don't mean that he originated from that era, but rather that he is associated with that methodology. Wolfram Euler is a German linguist specializing in Indo-European languages, whose work is rooted in the tradition of classical philology. An independent but prolific researcher, he distinguishes himself through an approach based on traditional comparative analysis, the study of hydronyms, and internal reconstruction, rather than the multidisciplinary methods that dominate the field today (such as phylogenetic modeling, computational linguistics, or historical sociolinguistics). This methodological orientation, rigorous yet conservative, gives his publications strong internal consistency while placing him on the fringes of mainstream theoretical trends. His best-known contributions concern the history of Germanic and Balto-Slavic languages, where he defends several minority positions: a prolonged cohesion of West Germanic, a location of the Germanic Urheimat in Central Germany rather than Scandinavia, an internalist interpretation of Germanic innovations, and a critique of the existence of a unitary Proto-Balto-Slavic language. He also adopts a late chronology for the formation of Proto-Slavic, following the thesis of Georg Holzer. While these propositions are rigorously argued, they stand in clear opposition to the prevailing consensus and are regarded as heterodox contributions rather than authoritative reference models. For these reasons, Euler cannot be presented as a representative of the general scientific community's viewpoint. His work is respected for its erudition and precision, but it does not form the basis of the reconstructions accepted by the majority of Indo-Europeanists. His adherence to an ethno-historical lens, which explains linguistic shifts primarily through population movements and ethnic continuities, stands in sharp contrast to the modern archaeological and linguistic 'caution' (notably due to the rejection of the Siedlungsarchäologie). Coupled with his ties to conservative intellectual circles (like the Bibliothek des Konservatismus in Berlin), this methodological stance consigns his work to the margins of mainstream academia, even as the erudition of his research remains recognized. Personally, I don't think this is a figure to be put forward as an absolute reference in a debate.

don't buff persians plus persians can cumulate theses 2 solutions btw corals