All Activity

Ardashir I: progenitor of the Sasanian dynasty, reinvigorated the idea of a Persian empire as a successor of Achaemenid Persia. May have an aura or tech about adding vigor to the civ, for example increases building construction speed Shapur I: tolerance for religions other than the prevailing Zoroastrianism such as Manichaeism or Judaism may present an interesting opportunity. Especially Manichaeism as a potential world religion in a what-if scenario perhaps? May give increased influence over the map such as increased territory bonus. Maybe also enable some Armenian unit via his conquest of Armenia and governorship of his son and successor. Shapur II: counter to Shapur I, something about religious doctrine, such as stronger priests or temples? Also enabling war elephants. Khosrow I: tax reform giving increased resources per resource obtained from sources, and bonuses to noble Aswaran cavalry Khosrow II: not sure, he appears to be partly responsible to bring the empire down? Why not something to represent quick expansion and loss, such as globally reducing building capture, or to make it a bonus, reduce own building capture and while reducing capturing enemy building even more.

Bildschirmaufnahme 2026-06-05 113133.mp4 I could add a person (or a donkey?) pushing the grindstone in a circle? Or maybe that's too much (performance wise and visually)? I can take a look into it. The han forge has something similar where we can get some inspiration.

Okay, but what changes in DE would make that happen? I'm at a loss.

Nice. Which part are you animating? The grindstone? I wonder of you'd be willing to help animate the Sasanian farmstead. It has two sail-driven grindstones. Perhaps as with the forge smoke, the sails can turn when the farmstead is researching (rule of cool).

I fixed a few refs in research manager and had a match vs AI where their units didn't go idle. I'll attempt some more test matches tonight. EDIT: Nevermind. Still happening: I see they have plenty of food, but have stopped gathering the wood needed for phase-up for some reason.

You kinda could. They way I invivision it is a low kit unit would have the same actor for all 3 ranks…. Then if you get a tech for spearman increased body armor say, all spearman would “promote” they would have to go back to rank 1, but then the “new” unit would have a new actor…. So you may need 9 templates just for that civ’s units if you have 3 “kit” upgrades.

Sadly, we can't currently only change props from techs, we can only swap in a whole unit actor. So, the best you could do is "levels" of gear, like "Basic Kit" -> "Medium Armor" -> "Heavy Panoply", which is fine and can definitely work. Then attack could increase by ranking.

Best would be to add a poll to the thread @Baelish

For the context, please read https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/issues/8599. I want to explain why I choose 5 gatherers for small ruins. Many entities inherit from template_gaia_ruins.xml, with different amount of stone and metal. I will do a summary of them: STONE stone_statues_kushite_bird, stone_statues_kushite_lion, stone_statues_kushite_ram 200 standing_stone, stone_statues_egyptian, stone_statues_kushite, stone_statues_roman, stone_structure_small 300 stone_column_roman 400 column_doric, roman_rostrum, stone_statues_persian_lamassu, stone_structure_farmstead, stone_structure_house, stone_structure_tower 500 METAL metal_statue_discobolus, metal_statue_poseidon 400 metal_statue_apollo, metal_statue_isis, metal_statue_wolf 800 As reference a small cut of rock has 1000 of stone and 12 gatherers, so I thought that would be a good deal to set 5 gatherers for something that has around 400

may even take it a step further, custCWA chart - Sheet10.pdfomize the weapons too (not the graphics though, just the stats, length, speed etc) based on this chart, if you find it fairly accurate.

correct, and all ranking up does for you is give you a little bit more health and a little bit more melee attack or range accuarcy.

If i remember correctly, Age of Mythology had this, and it looked pretty well. So ranking up does not impact visually except the rank icon right?

@OutisI was just using spearman as an example, but yes it would be for each melee unit... And what I would do for techs, with the help of you and @Thalatta over time is, I would have one armor one for spearman, swordman, pikeman, clubmen, axeman. So basicaly your unit starts off with "no armor" just a shield and weapon... and then you decide which ones you want to give which units, at a loss of speed... your gear or "kit" wouldnt look different as you ranked up... instead if you got a tech it would change the appearance of gear.

I am rather fond of techs. In fact, i recommend to check this mod for unit specific upgrades. I think it is a great way to differentiate civs. Some civs may need to research some upgrades, some civs could have the upgrade for free, some civs could be missing some completely.

My opinion: why differentiate shields only for spearmen? If you are going that route, i would base movement speed on the complete gear. However, keep in mind: this will be complex for both the team to balance as well as for casual player to notice the nuances. I say go for it and let's see how it works .

Removing an invocation of `pickRandom` doesn't invalidate another. (Worst case is that in DE the AI might not be serializeable.) I tried to bisect it but wasn't successful there are always like 10 units idle.

Could also get rid of some of the forge techs for shields... and the armor ones could be based on which civs used what types of armors. One for melee and one for ranged... a little more custimisation, and diversity. With hopefully "history" behind most of the units, techs, etc and why some civs have but others don't....

tell me if you think I’m crazy…. I was gonna lower all melee armor to 1/1/1..then set movement speed based on weapons, swords/maces first, then axes, then spear than pike. Then I was gonna differentiate “spearman” with a mixin based off of the type of shield they used…. I’ve played around with it for javelneers. I have the peltast, the caetra, the Parma, Celtic shield and noba shield. Then like @wowgetoffyourcellphone did with Thebes mod I can add a "history" which will give a little info on all the different shields, make things a little more educational and a lot more diverse. @Thalatta @Outis thoughts?

I tried exporting an animation and it gives me the error that the animation failed to load and the file is marked as bad and it doesn't export the prop points somehow. My prop-empties and the object are parented to the armature. Before exporting I select the props and the object, then at last I select the armature, so that it's highlighted. I created the skeleton file using the python script by @Stan` Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? EDIT: Nvm, I solved it, wrong name of the animation file in the actor editor.

Thanks to @Atrik Maury Ele archers can now shoot multiple arrows as they rank up! Sneak peak at volley attack which will be released next alpha

It would be cool to have a mod that makes gameplay a bit more tactical, using the metropolis mechanics from AoE 3, where you could level up a metropolis — which could be a famous city like Athens, Sparta, Rome, etc. — and receive shipments using points. Those points could be obtained from specific zones on the map, or generated based on the amount of territory controlled, or by using any other mechanic

Wow, I thought you were from Central America or something like that.

ban people like erictommy01

Looks like pickRandom was deleted as a tech research option in https://gitea.wildfiregames.com/0ad/0ad/pulls/8468/files#diff-982d380b40dc36243a91196999bdea61854236ba But I use it in DE's researchManager: if (tech[0] == "gather_lumbering_ironaxes" || tech[0] == "gather_mining_pickaxes") return { "name": pickRandom(["gather_lumbering_ironaxes", "gather_mining_pickaxes"]), "increasePriority": true }; if (tech[0] == "forge/techs_forge_cost" || tech[0] == "forge/techs_forge_speed") return { "name": pickRandom(["forge/techs_forge_cost", "forge/techs_forge_speed"]), "increasePriority": true }; Could this cause the problem? I really want the AI to choose a tech out of these pairs. It worked well enough in R28. If that's true, then base game's researchManager is bugged too at line 91: if (tech[0] == "traditional_army_sele" || tech[0] == "reformed_army_sele") return { "name": pickRandom(["traditional_army_sele", "reformed_army_sele"]), "increasePriority": true };

Hello Is it worth making the effort to report users on that forum? I mean, does anything actually happen to users who cheat? (For example, if they get banned or have their account disabled for repeated offenses; or if the win is awarded to the affected user.) Thanks! @Dunedan