DerekO Posted October 29, 2021 Report Share Posted October 29, 2021 On 27/01/2020 at 2:01 PM, Stockfish said: 2) Making a League Mode. This is handed with the first point, and in my opinion is the most atractive point. Why not making Rated Games Lobby a league mode, having a league depending of your rating. I give you an example: Wood League: (-1400) - Stone League: (1400-1600) - Bronze League: (1600-1800) - Silver League: (1800-1950) - Golden League: (1950-2100) - Platinun League (2100-2250) Diamond League: (2250-2350) /// Here, we would be at 1730 ratting more or less, which is a strong rating. Top 23 now. So, we could make a Pre Master league. Candidate Master: (2350-2450) - Master League: (2450-2600) - Grand Master League: (2600+) Obviously, designers should make an animation showed after each rated game with an experience bar with rating, that is filled or emtied acording if you win or lose. At the left with the current league, and at the right with the upper league. I don't know if you understand what i mean. 3) Giving some insignias: Before the nickname of each player, you could have some insignia depending of your rank, i thought in having your League's shield until you're Master or Grand Master, that you would have a yellow RM (Rating Master) or a GM (Grand Master). For example: GM elexis (2741) Sorry @elexis haha Maybe titles like GM or RM should stay forever, becouse it's suposed that only 12 players as much would get them in all seasons. Or maybe it should last just the current season and the next. Brainstorm guys =D Those in higher leagues could be invited into select tournaments Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thephilosopher Posted November 18, 2021 Report Share Posted November 18, 2021 The league idea sounds great, but I'd recommend checking where people are actually rated to see if those divisions make sense. My impression is that there aren't enough players rated above 2000 to separate them into three or more leagues. But I could be wrong about that. On the other hand, there's a huge difference between a player rated 1350 and a player rated 1000 (both in the "Wood League" here). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delvin Posted February 21, 2022 Report Share Posted February 21, 2022 I think they should also implement some titles for the players that we play daily in tg and 1vs1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manimal Posted June 13, 2022 Report Share Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) On 13/02/2020 at 8:23 PM, Stockfish said: - a list of the players and their ranking / statistics such as captured by the Ranking bot This and a sorting button by ascending/descending order for each column. e.g. [ Status (playing/standby/AFK/DND) | Name | Current OR General Ranking | Victory OR Defeat Rating | Hide/Show OR Mute/UnMute ] EDIT: Plese devs, make sure the users data are not alterable by tricky means / not hackable. Edited June 13, 2022 by Manimal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliasdiaz Posted December 14, 2022 Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 I feel a bit slow when playing, although my home network is very stable. Need to improve speed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellaz89 Posted December 14, 2022 Report Share Posted December 14, 2022 (edited) I see this thread now . I link this idea I had during these days Basically this would add tags to the games to identify the language register (e.g. safe-language/unsafe-language-VM18). This would help giving the players more information about the game and choose games with the preferred language register. The same concept could be used for other things: like playing style, playing level etc. and filtering functions can be added based on tags (show/order/hide games based on specific tags) Edited December 14, 2022 by Bellaz89 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richelbilderbeek Posted June 9, 2023 Report Share Posted June 9, 2023 I really like most of these ideas! What I miss most is a button called -for example- 'Play ranked 1v1' that will create a 1v1 ranked match on a random map with an opponent that is likelier to be of similar rating. Currently, it feels too socially involved to do a ranked 1v1 match: * For player with a lower rating: will he/she agree to maybe being beaten too easily? * For a player with similar rating: will he/she agree to a 1v1 instead of a team game? Do I already know him/her? * For player with a higher rating: will he/she agree to maybe beating me too easily? Feel free to ignore; I just wanted to share this :-) Cheers, `richelbilderbeek` 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.