dmzerocold

But really good if we can have it , if not 100% pefect but would be nice ... because ladder had HUGE part in ancient siege

My suggestion: for example when you order your troops (lets say 100 warrior) to invade a tower which for example has 10 warrior garrisoned inside , and you already upgraded ladder option for your troops 1- it should takes time your troops put ladder on tower (lets say 10 second) 2- troops cannot go inside , fast and all together (lets say , 2 warior every 5 seconds ) 3- we dont need to show what happen to those wariors inside of building, for each warrior reach inside we kill a warrior inisde of tower ... for example for every 3 attacker warior 1 garrisoned unit reduce (killed - both killed) Actually this upgrade can help your troops to capture a building much faster when its garrisoned by enemy troops Tower also can have some upgrades to reduce the speed of attackers, increase number of casualties for attackers , (boiling water etc) Elephant can garrison in tower ? i didnt know then , it is dangerous for themself , attakers can start a fire and all garrisoned units will flee .. kidding In reality , when you garrison a cavarly/elepant in a tower , bascially you are not using the horse for example horseman will stand and defend the tower as a infantry right? also archers also may not use sword inside of building , so we can say inside of tower we have man to man melee fight

i dont have technical knowledge to use it , but is it possible anyone use this script and share the files ? if im not wrong this script extract the details (attack , armor , speed ...) of all units , right?

Regarding siege weapons in history we can find different strategy to siege - Using ram / mobile towers / stone thrower (catapult) / balista ... these are exist in 0 A.D game These are not exist in game , but would be nice if we can have them as a upgrade for troops to use them - Using ladder , to conquer a tower or pass a wall and go into a siege And when they go inside through the ladder , they should be able to kill garrisoned soldier - Making fire to destroy wood-walls / structures - Building "Not-mobilize " RAM , under walls or structure Also agree with you that RAM should not be faster than a infantry

League of Legends World of Warcraft SC2 Overwatch 0 A.D Iron Harverst (Alpha) But nowadays i dont have time to play much , i spent 90% of my free time to translate 0 A.D after it then i can start over to play them

Regarding torches, it also depends on what kind of building you wanna throw it ... Stone wall? stone tower? it shouldn't work , but agree to destroy something with wood and grass is a good idea Also maybe we can add it as an upgrade for troops 1- to use torche for flammable buildings 2- few soldiers toghether build up ram , just to destroy small buildins , this one also should not be possible for big towers or walls , but acceptable for small size buildings .. not a fortress

@Catweazle Better one of the developers comment on this point , but AFAIK it is install on Windows 10 based on standard windows 10 app procedure... and not as a program ... short story it should be safer than normal programs (risk is less) dont worry ,

May i ask you why you concern this ? what issue it can create

im not sure how it works with RTL languages, is it working ? look at the below text مصطفی لطفی /say این را چه کار باید کرد؟

I am the copyright holder of original works I post in the Wildfire Games 0 A.D. Art Development forum. I hereby release all original works I uploaded to this forum in the past, and those I will upload in the future, under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

@Jokki Hirzu Just FYI , it is not much active and nowadays its like generic channel

Yes , please let me know how can i find it I tested on other systems , triple click is not working for me Alt + Double click is fine .. but Triple click is not working , This one also is not working for me: during building placement [: Rotate building 15 degrees counter-clockwise

Hi, Alt + Double click is working, but triple click not.. in manual and tutorial it is mentioned triple click

Hello guys, On tutorial game it is mentioned: .... Triple-click will select all units of the same type on the entire map. https://www.transifex.com/wildfire-games/0ad/translate/#fa/public-tutorials/117147881?q=text%3ATriple On manual text it is mentioned: Triple Left Click \[on unit]: Select all of your units of the same kind and the same rank on the screen https://www.transifex.com/wildfire-games/0ad/translate/#fa/public-gui-manual/37364824 So if this feature is working , English text for manual is not correct and it should change to "On map"... if this feature is removed (because its not working for me in game) then , tutorial require update

@Genava55 @Lion.Kanzen oh my mistake then , sorry for interrupts

Currently in game we have some civilization that are not before 500 BC for example Seleucid , Ptolemaic. Han / Qin / Gojoeson [and sorry my mistake by Jeoson i meant Gojeoson (ancient one ) i confused time frame, that admiral was for new Joeson not ancient one.. different story] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gojoseon You mean they are available in some modes ? If yes ,could you please let me know why we cant have eastern kingdoms part of standard game? if time frame is ok ,

Bactrians , i prefer we add some strong Irnanian Kingdoms like parthian empire P.S (Just for your information) we are not consider them (Bacrians) as Iranian kingdom .. they were Greek kings ruling Iran like Seleucid .. Meded, not sure why in English they wrote it like "Medes" but it should be "Maad" -> ماد , i also want to see this one Sodians, they were like a small state during Persian Empires like Hakhamaneshian (Achaemenid) or Parthian Empire , @Lion.Kanzen I suggest we plan to add these civilizations 1- Parthian Empire 2- Han Dynasty 3- Medes Empire 4- Maya 5- Qin dynasty (short period but HUGE impact on history of china, check Qin Shi Huang ) And when we add Han we cannot forget to add Joseon Dynasty, huge history .. 6 Joseon Dynasty [UPDATE: I made mistake and confused Ancient Joeson with New Joeson this guys is realted to New Joeson and not Old one] ( HOW awesome is to have a Yi Sun-sin as you Naval Chmapion- "military historians have placed him on par with Admiral Nelson as one of the greatest naval commanders in history" just check Immjin war ) I believe we should have priority for eastern Kingdoms which are really missing now (Han , Qin , Joseon).

@Lion.Kanzen First one (Zero K) is Total annihilation style i darn good old days second one (Ancestors legacy) is Company of heros style , Iron Harvest (2019) is also going to be this style.... I have access to Alpha still far away from final release @Alexandermb Empire Earth .... darn it remind me of my pains , i had wonderfull times with Empire Earth 1 , BUT then they took all of my good memories with sequel , i think purpose of Empire Earth2 was similar to Blue Whale ... Goo also was also nice , some nice ideas like high mobility of 1 faction ... but they had huge balance issue and many units almost useless many time of game , and finally their huge investment failed ... RIP

ok , let me consolidate all of them in 1 thread , and update that frequently when require. where do u suggest to post it if not in Art?

@Lion.Kanzen is it possible to move it to Development ? or creating new one?

@stanislas69 Not translating means leave them empty ? or use same for Farsi... currently i put same for Farsi

What do you mean by "quotes" and "Proverbs"? Also do i need to trasnlate these? Example: Epibátēs Athēnaîos or something like this iry hr ssmwtt

One more question , for RTL languages are you going to implement RTL layout ? or you keep current LTR layout ?

@(-_-) here is the text: دیدن ساختار درختی امکانات و قابلیت های تمدن در بازی 0 A.D ex.docx

Hello, iv reached to a section about chat commands Send text as a chat message (even if it starts with slash). Example: /say /help is a great command. https://www.transifex.com/wildfire-games/0ad/translate/#fa/public-gui-lobby/112201698 Could you please let me know if command also works in Farsi or not ? i think it should not no? then i should not translate example section of these , and they have to remain in English