Lion.Kanzen

Yeah I agree, you know more than me in W3. I like that about population but it's important restrict some units like Elephant.

I recommended basic, @mythos_ruler, many are in game already. The people want more for many reasons we see about them. I add some units that other users ask add but we can't add them, add Pirates to have enoght forces. @guys there most common basic warrior in game, they serve in all great empires and kingdoms or serves to rebels faction against great Empires. I use the basic class named. Now I will proceeded to check if they are in game. The units I posteded after are that aren't included. Pontos units and steppes are the missing here and Illyrians.

For know I need think how many units per training I mean how many tokens have the mercenary camp. May be 2 elite and 2 cheap/medium. And how can be the capture of the building. Finally how many units extra can support. The elephant can have 4 or siege class. 12 if is elite infantry 6 if is cavalry. And if are cheap can be 15. Plus penalization of training. If you lost all units you can not train in 7min. Except cheaper The Elite have big costs , cheaper less cost than regular. But I don't know about all this.

Why not pirates? They do it more frequently than "barbarian" Other was. According to legend, a year after the Romans kidnapped their wives from the neighboring Sabines, the tribes returned to take vengeance.

Ok. I get. I see that in aoEO, it's game mode, it's sounds found for multiplayer. A tip from professional: use bold or italic in your relevant text. The caps generates a kind fatigue in Visual perception

Summary. Xerxes I, king of Persia, who invaded Greece in 484 BC employed Greek mercenaries. In Anabasis, Xenophon recounts how Cyrus the Younger hired a large army of Greek mercenaries (the "Ten Thousand") in 401 BC to seize the throne of Persia from his brother, Artaxerxes II. Though Cyrus' army was victorious at the Battle of Cunaxa, Cyrus himself was killed in battle and the expedition rendered moot. Stranded deep in enemy territory, the Spartan general Clearchus and most of the other Greek generals were subsequently killed by treachery. Xenophon played an instrumental role in encouraging "The Ten Thousand" Greek army to march north to the Black Sea in an epic fighting retreat. Memnon of Rhodes (380 – 333 BC): was the commander of the Greek mercenaries working for the Persian King Darius III when Alexander the Great of Macedonia invaded Persia in 334 BC and won the Battle of the Granicus River. Alexander also employed Greek mercenaries during his campaigns. These were men who fought for him directly and not those who fought in city-state units attached to his army. Carthage contracted Balearic Islands shepherds as slingshooters during the Punic Wars against Rome. The vast majority of the Carthaginian military – except the highest officers, the navy, and the home guard – were mercenaries. Members of independent Thracian tribes such as the Bessi and Dii often joined the ranks of large organized armies as mercenaries. The Sons of Mars were Italian mercenaries used by the Greek kings of Syracuse until after the Punic Wars. Celtic mercenaries were a staple of many ancient armies. The king of Bythnia hired Galatians to his armies and gave them a parcel of land, which became Galatia, after their defeat, brought on by their raids and warfare against the various cities in the regions. There were also the semi-mythic amsaig, noted foremost as the mercenaries of Cu Chullain, but the term advanced later as a term for various Gaelic mercenaries.[citation needed] Another figure in oral legend, Milesius was given the princess Scota after conducting a successful campaign for Ancient Egypt. Mithridates VI Eupator recruited a large number of Iranians along with the Galatians into the Pontic army during the Mithridatic Wars against Rome, using the Leucosyri, Persians and Scythians. Illyrians were hired across the Balkans and further. They were known for their unreliability. In the late Roman Empire, it became increasingly difficult for Emperors and generals to raise military units from the citizenry for various reasons: lack of manpower, lack of time available for training, lack of materials, and, inevitably, political considerations. Therefore, beginning in the late 4th century, the empire often contracted whole bands of barbarians either within the legions or as autonomous foederati. The barbarians were Romanized and surviving veterans were established in areas requiring population.

The Hellenistic is more obviusly with variations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenistic_armies The Hellenistic armies is the term applied to the armies of the successor kingdoms, which emerged after the death of Alexander the Great. After his death, Alexander's huge empire was torn between his successors, the Diadochi. During the Wars of the Diadochi, the Macedonian army, as developed by Alexander and Philip II, gradually adopted new units and tactics, further developing Macedonian warfare. The armies of the Diadochi bear few differences from that of Alexander, but during the era of the Epigonoi (Successors), the differences were obvious, favoring numbers over quality and weight over maneuverability. The limited availability of Greek conscripts in the east led to an increasing dependence on mercenary forces, whereas in the west, Hellenistic armies were continuously involved in wars, which soon exhausted local manpower, paving the way for Roman supremacy. The major Hellenistic states were the Seleucid Empire, Ptolemaic Egypt and the Antigonid kingdom (Macedonia). Smaller states included: Attalid Pergamum, Pontus, Epirus, the Achaean League, the Aetolian League, Syracuse, and other states (like Athens, Sparta etc.). Cataphracts Cataphracts were heavily armed and armoured cavalrymen. The Cataphract (Kataphraktoi) were first introduced into the Hellenistic military tradition with the Seleucid Antiochus III the Great's anabasis in the east from 212-205 BC. With his campaigns in Parthia and Bactria, he came into contact with Cataphracts and copied them. Most of the Seleucid heavy cavalry after this period were armed in this manner, despite keeping their original unit names. The Cataphract generally only served in the eastern Hellenistic armies. Both man and horse were entirely encased in armourin the form of scale or banded segments sewn onto a fabric. Riders' faces were covered in seamless metal helmets. The weight carried by the horse was excessive, and prolonged charges were out of the question. Instead, cataphracts trotted to within a reasonable distance before charging, exerting energy only during the decisive engagement. Once in combat, the cataphract and his steed enjoyed superb protection from attacks thanks to their armour. However, stamina, endurance and heat were always concerns in extended combat. The standard cataphract weapon was a xyston-like spear. For close-quarter combat, a mace or sword was made available as a secondary weapon. The mace and cataphract ideas were combined into the Sassanid-introduced and Roman-named Clibanarii, who were armoured, both man and beast, in chainmail, and armed with a mace. Dromedaries[edit] Camels are attested in use in the Seleucid army at the battle of Magnesia, but their small number (500) suggests they were not a regular addition.[33] According to Xenophon,[34] their scent scared off horses, but this effect must not have been especially notable or more writers would have commented on this. Chariots[edit] War chariots were rarely used during the Hellenistic era. Their value against any opponent or commander of notable skill was very low as was already proven by the Ten Thousand (the Greek mercenaries with whom Xenophon served) at Cunaxa and Alexander in Arbela. Their use is considered more harmful than beneficial in the Greek tactical manuals, yet they could have a frightening effect on badly trained, inexperienced opponents, such as Asiatic tribal armies. The idea that the Romans had no previous experience in fighting chariots might be the reason why Antiochus III used them against the Roman army, with disastrous results for his own army. Appian suggests that wounding the horses drawing a war chariot can cast the formation in disorder, because an out-of-control chariot forces other chariots to engage in evading maneuvers to avoid being hit by its scythes.[26] Archelaus also used them against Sulla in the battle of Chaeronea, again to no avail.[27]

Pontos Army ( like to Carthage: a army of mercenaries) that is one of many is Mitridates IV called the Hannibal of East. (Wikipedia) : T he term did come to apply to a separate state after the establishment of the Kingdom of Pontus, beyond the Halys River (Kızıl river). The Persian dynasty which was to found this kingdom had during the fourth century B.C. ruled the Greek city of Cius (or Kios) in Mysia, with its first known member being Ariobarzanes I of Cius and the last ruler based in the city being Mithridates II of Cius. Mithridates II's son, also called Mithridates, would become Mithridates I Ktistes of Pontus ("Ktistes" meaning "The Founder"). During the troubled period following the death of Alexander the Great, Mithridates Ktistes was for a time in the service of Antigonus, one of Alexander's successors, and successfully maneuvering in this unsettled time managed, shortly after 302 BC, to create the Kingdom of Pontus which would be ruled by his descendants mostly bearing the same name, till 64 BC. Thus, this Persian dynasty managed to survive and prosper in the Hellenistic world while the main Persian Empire had fallen. As the greater part of this kingdom lay within the immense region of Cappadocia, which in early ages extended from the borders of Cilicia to the Euxine (Black Sea), the kingdom as a whole was at first called "Cappadocia towards the Pontus", but afterwards simply "Pontus," the name Cappadocia being henceforth restricted to the southern half of the region previously included under that title. This kingdom reached its greatest height under Mithridates VI or Mithradates Eupator, commonly called the Great, who for many years carried on war with the Romans. Under him, the realm of Pontus included not only Pontic Cappadocia but also the seaboard from the Bithynian frontier to Colchis, part of inland Paphlagonia, and Lesser Armenia. Pontic army : Due to the pontic roots, Pontic army was mixed and original. Mithridates was clearly a persian ruler, but heavily hellenized. His army was composed by greek style and persian style warriors. The "old" army, those of the beginnings in 300bc, was probably still heavily persian in style. It could have counted on levy spearmen like the sparabara, light mountaineers assault troops as the kardaka, and archers. Elite units would have been probably of royal takabara and kardaka style. Pontic cavalry was described having units of numerous horse skirmishers, an unusual fact as most eastern horsemen use bows instead. This was a product of the ancient persian style cavalry. Local troops were also available in large numbers, from cappadocia for the most, scythians from the black sea as mercenaries, even sarmatians. Nearby armenian mountaineers could also make valuable and cheap raiding infantry. Lately, in 150 bc., Pontus accesses to its greatest extent during Mithridates VI reign, and troops from all minor asia were available. A large part of the infantry was now composed of light "romanized" soldiers, driven from the light successors thureophoroi and the thorakitai evolution. Although this army was still impressive, it was no match against the Roman legions which crushed them definitely at Chaeroneia, when the pontic commander, Archelaus, gathered an army of 120 000 composed of Pontic, Thracian, Bithynian, Cappadocian, Scythian, Phrygian and Galatian troops. Sulla's tactic for his 40 000 roman legionaries and greek-macedonian defected troops rendered the famous pontic scythian chariots useless while having his infantry on the top of the chaeronian hills.

In historiography[edit] Herodotus reported that the Sarmatians were descendants of Amazons and Scythians, and that their wives observed their ancient maternal customs, "frequently hunting on horseback with their husbands; in war taking the field; and wearing the very same dress as the men". Moreover, said Herodotus, "No girl shall wed till she has killed a man in battle". In the story related by Herodotus, a group of Amazons was blown across the Maeotian Lake (the Sea of Azov) into Scythia near the cliff region (today's southeastern Crimea). After learning the Scythian language, they agreed to marry Scythian men, on the condition that they not be required to follow the customs of Scythian women. According to Herodotus, this band moved toward the northeast, settling beyond the Tanais (Don) river, and became the ancestors of the Sauromatians. According to Herodotus, the Sarmatians fought with the Scythians against Darius the Great in the 5th century BC. Hippocrates describes them as: "They have no right breasts...for while they are yet babies their mothers make red-hot a bronze instrument constructed for this very purpose and apply it to the right breast and cauterize it, so that its growth is arrested, and all its strength and bulk are diverted to the right shoulder and right arm." Amazons came to play a role in Roman historiography. Caesar reminded the Senate of the conquest of large parts of Asia by Semiramis and the Amazons. Successful Amazon raids against Lycia and Cilicia contrasted with effective resistance by Lydian cavalry against the invaders (Strabo 5.504; Nicholas Damascenus). Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus pays particularly detailed attention to the Amazons. The story of the Amazons as deriving from a Cappadocian colony of two Scythian princes Ylinos and Scolopetos is due to him. Pliny the Elder records some surprising facts pointing to the valley of the Terme River as possibly being their home: a mountain named for them (the modern Mason Dagi), as well as a settlement Amazonium; Herotodus (VI.86) first mentions their capital Themiscyra, which Pliny locates near the Terme.[77] Philostratus places the Amazons in the Taurus Mountains. Ammianus places them east of Tanais, as neighbouring the Alans. Procopius places them in the Caucasus. Diodorus Siculus (Bibliotheca historica chapter 49) derived the Amazons from Atlantis and located them in western Libya. He also relates the story of Hercules defeating the Amazons at Themiscyre. Although Strabo shows skepticism as to their historicity, the Amazons in general continue to be taken as historical throughout Late Antiquity. Several Church Fathers speak of the Amazons as of a real people. Solinus embraces the account of Pliny. Under Aurelianus, captured Gothic women were identified as Amazons (Claudianus). The account of Justinus was influential, and was used as a source by Orosius who continued to be read during the European Middle Ages. Medieval authors thus continue the tradition of locating the Amazons in the North, Adam of Bremen placing them at the Baltic Sea and Paulus Diaconus in the heart of Germania. Speculation that the idea of Amazons contains a core of reality is based on archaeological findings from burials, pointing to the possibility that some Sarmatian women may have participated in battle. These findings have led scholars to suggest that the Amazonian legend in Greek mythology may have been "inspired by real warrior women".[76] Evidence of high-ranking warrior women comes from kurgans in southern Ukraine and Russia. David Anthony notes, "About 20% of Scythian-Sarmatian "warrior graves" on the lower Don and lower Volga contained women dressed for battle similar to how men dress, a phenomenon that probably inspired the Greek tales about the Amazons."[83] Mounted Amazon in Scythian costume, on an Attic red-figure vase, ca 420 BCE Up to 25% of military burials were of armed Sarmatian women usually including bows.[84] Russian archaeologist Vera Kovalevskaya points out that when Scythian men were away fighting or hunting, nomadic women would have to be able to defend themselves, their animals and pasture-grounds competently. During the time that the Scythians advanced into Asia and achieved near-hegemony in the Near-East, there was a period of twenty-eight years when the men would have been away on campaigns for long periods. During this time the women would not only have had to defend themselves, but to reproduce and this could well be the origin of the idea that Amazons mated once a year with their neighbours, if Herodotus actually based his accounts on fact.[84] Before modern archaeology uncovered some of the Scythian burials of warrior-maidens entombed under kurgans in the region of Altai Mountains and Sarmatia,[85] [86] giving concrete form at last to the Greek tales, the origin of the Amazon story had been the subject of speculation among classics scholars. In the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica speculation ranged along the following lines: While some regard the Amazons as a purely mythical people, others assume an historical foundation for them. The deities worshipped by them were Ares (who is consistently assigned to them as a god of war, and as a god of Thracian and generally northern origin) and Artemis, not the usual Greek goddess of that name, but an Asiatic deity in some respects her equivalent. It is conjectured that the Amazons were originally the temple-servants and priestesses (hierodulae) of this goddess; and that the removal of the breast corresponded with the self-mutilation of the god Attis and the galli, Roman priests of Rhea Cybele. Another theory is that, as the knowledge of geography extended, travellers brought back reports of tribes ruled entirely by women, who carried out the duties which elsewhere were regarded as peculiar to man, in whom alone the rights of nobility and inheritance were vested, and who had the supreme control of affairs. Hence arose the belief in the Amazons as a nation of female warriors, organized and governed entirely by women. According to J. Viirtheim (De Ajacis origine, 1907), the Amazons were of Greek origin [...] It has been suggested that the fact of the conquest of the Amazons being assigned to the two famous heroes of Greek mythology, Heracles and Theseus [...] shows that they were mythical illustrations of the dangers which beset the Greeks on the coasts of Asia Minor; rather perhaps, it may be intended to represent the conflict between the Greek culture of the colonies on the Euxine and the barbarism of the native inhabitants.

I'm very hungry for bring exotic units to the game. And to the word. You know that bring the players.the players wants see new units. 70% de evidence of existence. Archimedes is a legend creates many war machines. Ok. Back to the topic. Temples taxation can be great. Ptolemaic temples and eastern temples like Jerusalem temples was a sites were you can do many types of commercial exchanges.

Iberi-Lusitans Iberi Lancieri cataphract Iberian? These hardy Iberians are among the choicest units available to a Carthaginian commander. They are a good all-purpose heavy cavalry, and they have a staying power on the battlefield that is simply unmatched by all but the most elite cavalry forces. They do not suffer from the same morale problems that the other Iberian troops in the service of a foreign power do since they are usually lavished upon by their commanders and their officers marry into Carthaginian or Liby-Phoenician families. They wear good quality mail armor and carry long Iberian style ovular shields. This combined with their use of a cavalry spear and falcata make them ideal cavalry for both the charge and fierce melee. These are probably the most versatile heavy cavalry in the world, and their status in the Carthaginian army proves this. Historically, the Iberian heavy cavalry was the most instrumental unit aside from the African Infantry at the battle of Cannae. They showed their martial prowess to an extreme degree by driving both the Roman and Allied heavy cavalry off the battlefield, turning and proceeding to drive the Roman light cavalry off the battlefield, then turning once more to completely surround the Roman infantry. Most cavalry would have been content with simply chasing after the Roman heavy cavalry. It takes a great deal of discipline to turn thrice, all without a commander of note during the battle! After ten years of fighting in Italy two thirds of these men were still at Hannibals side! -------- Ok one most exotic unit is this Dosidataskeli The Dosidataskeli

Cilician Epibatoi (Cilician Swords) Note: We can the mix of infantry with cilician pirates, pikeman, skirmisher and sword. Cilician pirates got a long tradition of raiding behind them. Those boarding troops could also use their skills in a regular melee. Native troops supported the Greek phalanxes of Ptolemaic Egypt. Brave and proud warriors, Egyptians fulfilled several roles, but were most commonly used as peltasts, skirmishers on the flanks of the phalanxes, or as non-phalanx infantry in difficult terrain. Although the Ptolemies adopted all the trappings of the Pharaohs and their religious infrastructure, there was still much unrest among the native population long after the succession. This was due mainly to the way the Greek overlords used the traditions of the Pharaohs to fill their coffers at the expensive of ordinary people. The core of Ptolemaic armies was always Greek until the Battle of Raphia in 217BC, when they faced such a large Seleucid force that Ptolemy IV was forced to muster some 30,000 native Egyptians for the first time. Need overcame suspicion of the disenchanted natives. The performance of the Egyptians in battle eventually led to a greater proportion of native troops in the Egyptian army and, in time, more diverse roles for those men as they gained the trust of their Greek commanders.

Illyrian mercenaries. http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?378102-RTR-VII-Preview-III-The-Ardiae This are very rare units mix celtic with Greek. Very exotic. The Illyrian Grosphomachoi are effective and renowned skirmishers, pirates and raiders. These hardy warriors are found in Illyrian armies as capable skirmishers, quickly moving across the battlefield to harass enemy formations, occupy key points, or conduct ambushes. Armed with heavy throwing spears, and a large Celtic-style theuros shield for protection, these men are capable of close fighting with their secondary weapon, a small one-handed axe. Unarmoured except for simple bronze pot helmets, these troops will not stand for long in close melee with heavy infantry, but are well matched against enemy light troops. Hoplite Dalmatae These men are usually simple farmers, seafarers and pastoralists, who are mustered for war by their chieftains and war leaders with the promise of slaves and booty, or perhaps the need to defend their homeland from invasion. Politically, the organization of indigenous groups in Illyria was deeply rooted in its kinship structure, rather than in the development of the more sophisticated institutions of the polis or kingdom. Although the thuereophoroi type of heavy skirmisher only became popular in Greece after 280 BC, it was a long-standing type of warrior in Illyria. Illyria was famous for its pirates, who typically prowled the Adriatic Sea in their small lemboi, simple biremes that may have held as few as 50 men. Fleets of these lemboi were able to sail into Greek and Italian waters, and disgorge their crew, who, armed as Grosphomachoi, were able to quickly move inland and pillage coastal regions before a coordinated defence could be mounted. These are the standard line infantry of the Illyrians, and they fight as close order spearmen, armed with thrusting spears (dory), round theuros-style shields, and carrying a simple sword - the distinctive Illyrian sicca - as a secondary weapon. Largely unarmoured except for a simple helm, these warriors rely on their shield, mobility and fighting prowess for protection. Although equipped with the Celtic-style theuros, these men still fought as close order spearmen, in a phalanx formation. The appearance of the theuros became widespread among the Illyrians from c. 280 BC. At this time Illyria came under the strong influence of the expansion of La Tene cultural templates from Central Europe, and the most significant exponents were the Celtic Taurisci and the Scordsici. These Illyrian warriors were recruited in large numbers from among the men of the southern Illyrian tribes, and formed the backbone of the Illyrian armies that threatened Macedonia and Greece throughout the fourth and third centuries BC. Although these men operated as raiders and freebooters, they were capable of rapidly concentrating their strength and forming strong battle lines with which to confront their Epierote and Macedonian enemies in open battle. The Illyrians in 233 BC had no compunction about charging a larger Aitolian army (the League's whole levy), brushing aside their light infantry holding hilltops and following up with a fast downhill charge which swept away the Aitolian cavalry and heavier troops. The good order and the willingness to hold firm and fight hand to hand, displayed by the Dardanoi in 200 BC, is seen as early as 358 BC when Bardylis' men formed square when outflanked by a Macedonian army with more cavalry, and though eventually beaten put up a prolonged resistance. The contrast between 5th-century Illyrians fighting individually in no order and their 3rd-century counterparts in formed speirai suggests a marked improvement in battlefield organisation probably related to the new tactics. The Macedonian example probably had a lot to do with these changes, and improved organisation and more resolute tactics no doubt contributed to the successes of 3rd century Illyrian raiders. The southern Illyrian communities such as the Ardiaei, Daorsi, Pleraei, Narensii, Taulantii etc, the so-called political Illyria, were under stronger Hellenistic influences, more engaged in maritime trade, economically more advanced than the peoples in the hinterland, and they enjoyed the highest levels of urbanisation in the region, apart from Liburnia. The nature of the internal structure of the Illyrian kingdom is disputed, as some scholars, such as Hammond, see it as the dominion of the most powerful people over others, while Papazoglu sees it as a strongly centralised kingdom with an unbroken tradition from the fourth century BC. The Illyrians kings had major difficulties in controlling the power of the leaders of neighbouring communities nominally subjected to their power in the third and second centuries BC, while attempting to establish a more centralised kingdom following Hellenistic models, in particular the Macedonian kingdom. Some of the stronger and economically more advanced south Illyrian peoples, such as the Daorsi or Taulantii, had an interest in forming an alliance with Rome and escaping the dominion of the Illyrian kings. Hence, the kingdom of Illyria existed among the Illyrian peoples of southern Illyria, and appears to have consisted of certain tribes and strongmen called kings in the ancient sources establishing their pre-eminence among their neighbours. Ancient sources mention a certain Galaour, the ruler of the Taulantinoi, who, towards the end of the seventh century BC, waged wars against the king of Macedonia. Modern historians, interpreting a passage from Herodotus, have indicated that at this time an army of Encheliae, who lived around Lake Lychnitis (the present Lake Ochrid), invaded Greece and pushed as far as Delphi where they pillaged the sanctuary of the Oracle. For the next two centuries, wars became more frequent in southern Illyria and on its boundaries. The Illyrian tribes aimed not just at pillage; the Illyrian kings aimed to subjugate other Illyrian tribes into their federation.

This image can be helpful to find tribes. From Total War Rome 2. May be this most relevant legacy of that game.

but I never use Unix. I'm not IT guy. Mac OSX have some differences. It's more practical for some things and unpractical for other (snow leopard).

Yeah I want put some order to do it this. And I be mentioned even the units thst are in a faction. Other reason is the user can suggest other relevant warriors. The first sort is for Culture Faction and the other for class, style weapons and armor, and fight. The third by version of game first part and second. ###################### my list is by Ethnic-region or Minifaction.mercenay. ####updated############ Mythos basic mercenaries (sort biome) These are first approved basic. I called first generation. Hindu Kush/India Kushan CavalryIndian War ElephantEastern Eastern ArcherEastern Light CavalryIndian War ElephantSteppes Scythian Horse Archer (male and female variations)Scythian AxemanArabia Camel Raider (Cav Skirmisher)Arabian JavelineerLevant (this is represented as a mercenary dock or port) Phoenician TriremeJudean Sikarios (knifeman)Cilicia (this is represented as a mercenary dock or port)Cilician Pirate (skirmisher)Cilician Pirate Ship (Hemiolia)Anatolia Galatian SwordsmanArmenian CataphractEgyptianNubian Archer (take this out of the Ptolemies roster)Mercenary ThureophorosBalkans Thracian PeltastThracian Black Cloak (swordsman)Illyrian SpearmanGreece Mercenary HopliteAetolian Euzenos (skirmisher)Thessalian LancerCretan ArcherMagna GreciaTarentine CavalrySamnite SwordsmanMamertine SpearmanItalia ? ? North Africa Numidian CavalryMasaesylian SpearmanNorth African War ElephantCelticaCeltic Auxiliary SpearmanGallic Auxiliary CavalryIberia Celt-Iberian SwordsmanBalearic SlingerIberian Allied CavalryAnd then each civ could add 1-3 of their own specific mercs once they capture one of the above.For instance: PersiansKardakes HopliteKardakes TakabaraMacedonian War Elephant (this is how we give them the War Elephant without making it a "standard" unit for them)Greek Allied Hoplite--------- General mercenaries ---------- This in order create the minifaction warrior and redistribute in them and Mercenary camp. African Gaetuli warrior(I need type) Yugurta wars Gaius Salustius - they are a ethnic that form Numidian EmpireBerebers cavalryElephant African Rider - Elite.Athens 1- Generic Name: Athenian Trireme.Specific Name: Triḗrēs Athēnaïkós.vClass: Trireme.2-Generic Name: Light Warship. Specific Name: Pentēkónteros. Class: Bireme.-sailors/MarinesDev source: http://trac.wildfiregames.com/wiki/Civ%3A_Athenians Armenian - Bactrian -Indian pikeman (Hellenistic) -Indian Elephant -Cavalry lancer Balearic Balearic slinger(Iberian) Berebers Cavalry swordsman Desert infantry swordsman Brigantes Pirate brigantine ship(very light ship). Celtic -cavalry -naked fanatic Cilician -Pirate galley -Cilician Pirate Cretan Archer infantry Marine/ship Dahae Cavalry archer Infantry archer Dacian -Heavy swordman cavalry (elite noble) -Heavy swordman Egyptian Camel swordman Royal guard sword (kapesh sword)elite. Priest of Isis. May be a bonus. Epirotes Cavalry Lancer Pikeman Etruscan - Galatian Swordman Cavalry swordsman Iberian Iberian Lancer.(Carthaginian embassy already) Scutarii illyrian Illyrian Spearman hoplite Illyrian Raider. Axe throwing Illyrian Pirate Ship. Italiots Samnites infantry sword Samnites infantry skirmish Samnites spearman Tarantine cavalry (skirmisher) Allied Italic cavalry skirmisher Corsican Pirate ship Sardinian Pirate ship Jews -Maccabean infantry -Slinger -Zealot. Fanatic (I'm not sure with this one.) Kushan Cataphract Cavalry archer Libyan Spearman Libyan skirmisher Macedon Bolt shooter Silver shield (elite) Pikeman Cavalry lancer(cheap) Mauryan Elephant armored Chariot archer Heavy infantry mace. Elephant archer Median Heavy cavalry lancer Archer Nabatean - Camel Archer -Camel swordman Nubian Archer infantryman Infantry spear Infantry skirmish. Numidian Cavalry skirmisher Sword Calvary Parthian Cataphract Heavy Axemen Shield bearer Rhodes -swordman marine -hoplite -archer infantry -Slinger(cheap) Roman Veteran swordman(elite) Siege ballista Pirate Roman Quinquirreme (Sextus Pompey) Pergamon -Pikeman -Cavalry Lancer -Galatian Swordman Phoenician Haevy Trireme. Pontos Kardace hoplite(elite) Cataphract Shield bearer Scythed chariot(elite) Eastern pikeman(cheap) Syrian Archer infantry Pikeman Syrian (Seleucid) Romanized Infantry(elite) Scythians Amazon cavalry archer(elite) Amazon axe cavalry(elite) Heavy lancer(elite) Spearman Infantry archer(cheap) Long Swordman Suebii Axe infantry - Night raiders(exotic) Cavalry swordman Infantry archer Long swordman infantry Syracuse Hoplite Siege tower Bolt shooter Light ship Medium Heavy ship Marines(swordman)/hoplite Thracian Black coated (elite) Thracian hoplite(cheap) Cavalry Lancer Skirmisher Tessalian Cavalry lancer Cavalry skirmisher Cavalry sword Teutons Heavy swordman(elite) Skirmisher Cavalry spearman Thebes Sacred band veteran(elite) Non factional -Incendiary pigs. Yeah they were real but not common. -War dogs(roman, Celt, German, Dalmatae ) -light siege Ram.(very waek and cheap) #######I'm not finish... I need a lot of help. I will post this for now but I'm editing###### I need sources and a illustrations represent these warriors. Now you can comment and add info and ideas for other mercenary units http://www.honga.net/totalwar/rome2/unit.php?l=en&v=dei&f=rom_seleucid&u=Gre_Marines

need improve the perspective Of walls. But is nice. I want join to share images from Han dynastyI want to lean some OFar eastern history.

we have a tech discuss wephere can propose ne tech. You can keep some about copy here but is best have there, you know order and relevance because that is pinned topic.

Why? ( yeah I see today 300: RaE haha and I was think same when see Temisthocles riding a horse over a Trirreme.) But can represent he cavalry invasion force.

You register easily put a user that you want and a password. Then you can acces.

Tavern and other ancient comercial building. A mint is like a Bank. We need know were can found buildings in each civilizations thst works in same way. Tavern is in all cultures. But they don't loan money. Temples in some cultures. Civil buildings in others.####we can add Cultural neutral eyecandy buildings like "machine workshop" ( siege workshop+ civil improvements with machines! like Archimides innovations machine and other scientist and mathematians

I need take some time for install the libraries. Can be helpful if the main team help the user with that external. I'm not expert in linux I'm like Colombus crossing the Atlatinc sea. Never I do this before and linux is mysterious OS for me.

Special units. I think in that. Assassins, spies, saboteurs, and all rare units that are used to perform black operations. We need something like that, but I'm not sure if a mint is the best. Because we have a market.

Yeah but we need a naval version. That can be great for non naval cultures like Iberians.

Good questions in Age of Empires all are very diferent between, but have same space in map.The differences here is the accuracy that we can get, if we don't found a example we use artistic license ( imagination) to create one. Some can be abandoned buildings, other can be like a mix beteween barrack and fort.