Lion.Kanzen

you will made...

Imperial Gallic G (The Classic ;D ) Robinson considered this the “typical mid-first century legionary helmet” (although the Coolus was probably more common) and it seems to have continued in use on into the early second century AD. The best example was found in the Rhine River at Mainz-Weisenau and is now exhibited in Worms, Germany. Helmets of this style can definitely be dated to the Boudican revolt of AD 61 based on fragments found in rubbish pits at Colchester (now reassembled and displayed at the Colchester Castle Museum). The carrying handle seen on the Weisenau original (and our reproduction) Imperial Gallic I This helmet dates to the same period as the Imperial Gallic H, and is essentially the same design, but is made in the cupric alloy “orichalcum” (brass) instead of iron. Like several other helmets, the original was found in the Rhine River at Mainz, and the original of this particular helmet bears the inscription of a soldier named L. Lucretius Celeris of Legio I Adiutrix. This Legion was stationed at Mainz from 71 to 86 AD, dating the helmet to this period. Although its crest attachment was missing, a round imprint suggests a soldered on disc, indicating it had either an Italian style “twist on” crest holder, rather than the Gallic style “slide-on” crest. Three orichalcum helmets of this style are known. All three show evidence of feather holders, which occur only rarely on iron ones, and it may be possible that in the late first century when iron helmets seem more common, the brass helmets and feather tubes suggest a higher rank, perhaps that of option.

Detailed info about helmets seen into the Trajan Column exemple. Introduction. how accurately Roman arms and armour were portrayed in classical sculpture? There has been a lot of debate in particular over the helmets worn by legionaries. A lot of armchair-critics and historians often scoff at the idea of using stylised sculpture such as reference for Roman equipment. However, they seem to forget that Rome, as a militaristic imperial power, would have had soldiers present everywhere, and so artists would certainly have had an idea about legionary armour based on what they had seen. For example, historians used Trajan's column and the column of Aurelius, and said that the helmets depicted with the rigs on the bowl didn't exist. However, there is a genuine helmet of that style in a museum in Hamburg: the helmets miles and auxilia used in the dacian wars were of "weisenauer type at other war monuments (that were most probably built by legionnaires that were in actual service in dacia and moesia) the armour of the roman soldiers conforms with archaeological finds. i.e. the legionnaires wear mostly lorica hamata, squamata and plumata. also their helmets have no rings, different cheek protectors! and the 4 dacian falx types are correct too. under editing... . More likely, the Italic D was the product of a single workshop producing a more decorative type for soldiers who might wish to shell out a bit more for splashy headgear. Since the Italic D has integral brass cross-braces placed flat against the skull, providing a double-thickness of metal at a critical point, it is tempting to speculate that the superior performance of this type versus the Dacian falx is what led to the decision to retrofit cross bracing to all helmets in the Dacian theatre Imperial Gallic helmets, which Robinson believed were the products of Celtic craftsmen in Gaul, featured a pair of distinctive embossed eyebrows on the forehead region and tended to be carefully made and elaborately decorated. Imperial Italic helmets, which Robinson saw as the product of less-skilled copycats in Italy and elsewhere in the Empire, lacked the eyebrows and were somewhat more roughly made. The differences in decoration and workmanship tended to diminish as time went on; the last two Italic types classified by Robinson, the Hebron (Italic G) and Neidermorter (Italic H) helmets, were as carefully crafted and well-decorated as any Imperial Gallic helmet. The Roman combat experience in Dacia under Domitian (AD 81-96) and Trajan (AD 98-117) produced further developments in helmet design. The ability of the wicked Dacian falx, a two-handed sickle-like sword, to reach over the Roman shield wall and pierce a helmet like a can-opener forced the Romans to come up with countermeasures in the form of two iron bars riveted crosswise across the helmet scull (alternatively, two thick bronze strips might be riveted to the top of a bronze legionary or auxiliary helmet). This started as a field modification, as seen on several Imperial Gallic helmets with the crossbars hastily riveted right over the decorative eyebrows. An illustration by Peter Connolly, seen above right, depicts this type of modification to an Imperial Gallic H helmet. Crossbars are seen on some, though not all of the legionary helmets on Trajan’s Column. Imperial Italic G The original example of this distinctive helmet was found in a cave near Hebron, Israel, and was thought to be captured war booty of the Jewish Zealots of the Bar Kochba Revolt during the reign of Hadrian, ca. AD 133-135. Consequently, it is the one helmet that can be convincingly dated to the period covered by Legio VI Victrix and is the preferred helmet of our legion. The Imperial Italic G represents the earliest Roman helmet discovered in which the post-Dacian Wars crossbars were probably part of the original construction, as evidenced by the brass lunate decorations applied between the crossbars. Finally, this is probably the most accurate helmet made by the Deepeeka group in India

mostly points I see in my years in the forum and my spanish group are: Territory system (very restrictive)Citizen Soldiers: Gestational army vs Economy bonus.Balance the Factions. (as AoM or Blizzard games.)Difference the Factions XD (AoK the difference not was enough)Add more factions/ "my Country Faction"(or Exotic) or following Total war Factions. Example Mayans or Pontus, are the more requested.optimization.

yeah the arms... looks so bad and/ or unrealistic.

look promising...

yeah I was request help to Feneur... I have full of open pages. an image for the first post

Yeah, more easy to update and upload the mod. Congratulations I will test.

I agree with Thorfinn. cut the stances from stamina concept. Stanina must be related with charging and skills, not with behavior.

you can add a GUI option to enable / disable that option.

Yeah, may be we haven't a model with long leaves + short tunic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_army_unit_types other interesting list of roman army types, even have all of them an full article.

you need uses a model with long sleeves, the segmented pieces in the arms don't suppose to be tight.

For me must be weak vs cavalry(2x) melee and melee infantry (1,5x)

Or are speaking about a idea that we want implement, mercenary camps. But that is other topic, but he and me want to implement in the mod.

All classes will be use Battalion?

I Agree

Can considerate my sugg still about post Trajan era? ( Helmets)

Is in Italian, for me is some clear The name of the video is : 0A.D a new strategy game? He wants a little serie about the game to publicity. But I'm not sure my Italian is not the best

Gif are allowed too.

[m dia] I like this model.

What you think about this, is a representation of an auxiliary helmet but, have some new features, have Roman modification to agaist ( support at the top) Dacian Falxs

Probably is spamming some kind content or is just a joke.

That word don't mean anything for me, the insults in English are quite soft, compared with my own language. iPad autocorrection edit1