Lion.Kanzen

I have a video of that movement. The farm is divided into 9 points in aoe II. The villager collects first 1/4 of what he can carry at the first point and so on 2/4...3/4..4/4 These points are randomly defined

You in Europe take for granted that the supremacy of law and equality is given in all countries. That thought predominates more in Protestant Europe, in other cultures we are more relaxed with that norm (that's bad). But it is the reality, in hospic cultures it is normal, then this generates corruption and preferential treatment.

She behaves like the age she claims to be.

I think so, it's been a while since I played with the development version.(SVN)

Show a screenshot and upload a replay file here. Maybe some additional information such as the factions involved.

Ctrl+ C

She is still young. It will take her a couple of years.

It is as I expected 2x1.

Looks like a wall segment(gates?).

Most people only consume and do not stop to think critically.

You know well that the building was not designed to be a palace. Ideally, you should use the references to create a new one. It would be with your basic idea but with the necessary finishes. The garden is fine. I honestly don't see why it shouldn't be considered a new palace. No matter who does it.

Whatever

I am not criticizing quality, but it is necessary to look for ones that give a palace sensation, the problem also goes through the model (meshe). People already nicknamed it bus station. It would be good to create a new model with the references. The proportions you gave are fine for the size.

As this is a generic AoE 2 post and is not related to the DE or HD version I will leave content like this.

Siege Tower Ship.

I have an idea. You could make it so that as it loses life, it starts to become faster and more destructive.

is that now? Should be good against cavalry.

Matters. For example if an elephant can go with 16 esperman it would be very pathetic if ub melee group like spearman or pikeman could not handle an elephant. And the other thing is historical accuracy. Another reason it matters is because they are simply the default infantry unit. Historical logic says that a large group should be able to handle the elephant... Another good reason is that the battering ram already serves a function of not being so easily held by spearman infantry or pikemen. Especially for the pikemen. Neither elephant was a very powerful unit as you could imagine not even armored. In a one on one combat elephant should obviously win. But in a combat against a good infantry group the infantry should win. For obvious reasons don't expect the infantry to keep hitting and hitting and hitting. Another reason is that most factions that have elephants have archers. So therefore it would be quite easy to wipe out the infantry major in a few seconds. In fact a good Rush Maurya could easily wipe out almost any army.

Not bad, but the same design with larger proportions and better texture could be used as a base.

It's not about combat counter... It is a distractor unit that serves as a metashield or mattress to stop elephants. You need a melee unit to keep the elephant busy. But the logical thing to do is to stop the elephant with something so that it doesn't destroy your buildings. While you kill it with counters.

Towers should be nerfed vs some infantry melee units.