Leaderboard

The problem was that they were inpersonnating us and refused any communication. Then when they saw it wasn't going great they tried to sell it to do a grift.. Other than that there was no issue. We didn't know what version they uploaded, if they added malicious software in it or anything.

It should be possible (and patches are welcome) I used it as way to see that people were doing weird stuff

I think this has been discussed somewhere. I did it at least in some of these python postanalysis scripts that fly around here. A general fix would be nicer imo. Maybe toggle the state of a building to ungarrision and once the key is released it toggles back to not do that. It's also not good for the network that more commands gets send than necessary. There is some potential to clean up and the work should be best done upstream.

It would honestly be great if it was either an element in options, or a toggle button in-UI in-game (my preference), or both. EDIT To expand on what I mean by a toggle button, what I mean is a button that toggles between capture by default and attack by default. So, in a match, you can dynamically swap back and forth, as the situation dictates. I'd rather not have this be on a per-unit basis like a stance, but rather a broad policy for all units to toggle back and forth. The game already has a ton of micro as-is. Or, have both, where you can change it like a stance on a per-unit basis, but also have the big toggle button that changes it (overrides) for all units at once.(And, of course, hotkeys for both)

So, I just played the new Greek major god, Demeter. I have to say it's quite disappointing. Their decisions when creating this major god are baffling. Several pre-release fan-made concepts for Her were 10x better and more well thought out than what we received. If I were a Demeter acolyte, I'd be angry (lol). No female hero, which is a shame (No Medea? Circe?). No Hera minor god choice. Myth units are gangly and have odd abilities. No real Fortress UU (Amazons say hello!!!), just another bad Myth unit. I've also decided after several skirmish matches that 0 A.D. is just a plain better designed game in a lot of ways (especially with the DE mod, eh hem). Some of the animations in AOMR are just plain bad. Unit recognition at zoom is nonexistent. The environments are super cartoony and distracting. It's lacking several UX items that 0 A.D. has, like formation drawing, which is huge. I found myself frustrated that AOMR didn't have it. Whoever suggested the feature for 0 A.D. should get a gold star. AOMR's UI is bewildering. AOMR's unit and tech and building portraits are terrible. It's missing things like selection sounds for gaia objects (trees, mines, etc.) which are much appreciated in 0 A.D. That 0 A.D. has 'medallions' for heroes at the top of the screen is also sorely missing in AOMR. So useful for selecting heroes. AOMR's encyclopedia is pretty great. It also has a lot of game modes that 0 A.D. just doesn't have (yet?). I mean, does 0 A.D. even have any game modes yet, truly? lol AOMR has balanced strategies between rush, boom, and (now, after recent patches) defense. AOMR's textures and lighting engine are super nice. AOMR's expanding and contracting minimap is a great feature that 0 A.D. should have. But still, things are baffling, like boat sizes. Sure, 0 A.D.'s are too big, but AOMR's are the size of a battering ram and look cartoony as Hell, even more so than AOM's first release 25 years ago! In some ways, AOMR's water rendering is nicer (it has more features), but in other ways, 0 A.D.'s water looks nicer. Just, in general, I think 0 A.D. is heading in a good direction in a lot of ways when compared to a AAA game like AOMR. For all my criticisms and long wish list, 0 A.D. just plays more naturally and just feels like the player has more control over what's going on. I think I'll be playing 0 A.D. long after AOMR is dead. EDIT: And 0 A.D.'s music is just plain better! @OmriLahav

If it's ambiguous I think we can still use it (better than nothing) - until a linguistic crowd proves us wrong.

Free Software can legally be sold (although I am not stating this is specifically the case of 0 A.D.) See this: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html The word "Free" in "Free Software" can be misleading due to its ambiguous meaning. GNU and FSF clarify which interpretation should be given to the word "Free". Quoting from https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en: [...] think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.”

The license states that it is Free software. It legally can’t be sold.

The skirmish cavalry has some weirdness, so needs another iteration.

This debate will never end, so what do you suggest? I am skeptical about *þurpą meaning village that early on. You are skeptical that *haimaz means village that early on. Is there an alternative?