Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 2025-11-11 in Posts

  1. This is actually an excellent idea for a Wonder. Much better than the destroyed Roman army camp.
    3 points
  2. Created a new work-in-progress Civ entry on the Wiki. Better update the portraits ASAP? Especially the heroes... who was that doing the Han heroes and Cleopatra?
    3 points
  3. Erechtheion and carytids from the acropolis in athens https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erechtheion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caryatid https://www.artstation.com/artwork/lxY91a 1228892164_erechtheion0_28.1.zip licence
    2 points
  4. So maybe a wonder could look something like that? Do you have further references? without the heap:
    2 points
  5. Sure, here you go 942182649_erechtheion0_28.2.zip
    2 points
  6. Hi ! I am considering introducing Lua (luajit) as a second modding language, alongside JavaScript. Here’s why: performance: Lua is fast, especially for CPU-heavy mods (AI, simulations, etc.), which is critical for large-scale RTS battles. simplicity: Lua’s lightweight syntax and C/C++ integration make it easier to expose engine features directly to modders. ecosystem: Lua is widely used in gaming (e.g., World of Warcraft, Roblox) and has robust tooling for debugging and profiling. sandboxing: Lua’s simplicity allows for tighter security controls, reducing risks of crashes or exploits. this isn’t a replacement for JavaScript. javascript mods will continue to work! The goal is to add options, not remove them. Lua could become the preferred language for performance-critical mods, while JS remains great for UI/scripted events. what this means for modders: gradual rollout: Lua support would be phased in, starting with experimental access to core APIs. tooling: we'd provide Lua-specific documentation, debuggers, and compatibility layers for JS ↔ Lua interop. points for discussion: are there existing JS workflows we would struggle to replicate in Lua? is there any other integrations like this one done in the past or abandoned we have notice of, can we learn from it ? where to start, is there any tips for a unexperienced 0ad "core" dev like me or others wanting to help that we can start learning from ? other topics of discussion ... please feel free to add and help ?
    1 point
  7. Yeah, I have no idea how to do that. I’m not much of a Java coder. My attempts at reverse engineering code succeed about 1/3 of the time.
    1 point
  8. I ran into a disk failure, probably, the error was NOT related, however after restoring everything I've then been able to compile. Something was very probably outdated but I don't think it was the compiler since I tried both clang and gcc, clang had at least the most recent version and gcc was 12.x Now using gcc 13.3.0 It works seamlessly. Thanks.
    1 point
  9. @Sundiata started a concept based on the sanctuary from Gournay sur Aronde but never showed it publicly, it was meant to replace the current Gallic temple: Edit: I added the blend file from Sundiata Gaul_Sanctuary_Gournay_sur_Aronde_V2.blend
    1 point
  10. You can bake at any resolution to get more crisp details. In the game though currently most textures are 1024*1024 and ideally we shouldn't go above this unless you have a 20k tris model. Small items should either have smaller textures, or to reduce fragmentation be baked in the same texture as the main mesh they are used on.
    1 point
  11. Before you start experimenting, back up your important data, or better yet, create a system image using Clonezilla. From what I've seen, the PuerOS documentation is very poor, and there's no information about updating releases—you have to guess. So either they didn't bother to write it or there's something wrong with the updates. Or maybe I was looking in the wrong place? In either case, be careful. Good luck. Regards.
    1 point
  12. You might try to make a weathered version of the boat texture to make it look like it's been there a little while.
    1 point
  13. Looks really cool! Maybe the stone wall could use a few more details to look less blocky but otherwise good job.
    1 point
  14. The only illustrative reference is from Ancient Warfare magazine but it is a sketchy simplification : The boat was submerged with blacksmith tools, with wooden vessels and recipients, animals were sacrificed, notably a horse and two dogs. Spears and oars were thrust into the silty bottom to anchor it. There were dozen of spears and shields submerged with the boat.
    1 point
  15. Can you add verbose to your build command like "make -C build/workspaces/gcc verbose=1" so we see the actual build command run. Also what output do you get for "g++ --version" and "clang++ --version"? Side note, premake --cc option with version, ie gcc-12 isn't documented and broken in some cases. Typically if you use binutils you wont have an corresponding ar-12 for example which it would look for.
    1 point
  16. Okay, I have two questions. I am using the SpawnEntityOnDeath feature to make a unit spawn more units when it dies (a siege machine spawn it's crew). However, when I try, the spawned unit just stands there, like a corpse. It can attack and turn, but it can't move. My second question is if there is a way to spawn multiple units using the SpawnEntityOnDeath feature. Does anyone know how to do either of these things?
    1 point
  17. the scythians are meant to have one too, though it's ahistorical, but the art is still missing lol, never realized it looked like a volcano. There is an entrance under it, with a sacrificial place inside, where the fire is burning. I used this model as hp: https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/anta-grande-do-zambujeiro-5f328a5d7cdd4f96b9a4dcacb426348e I can get rid of the fire and add a stone that covers it so it looks more like a cave. What would you think? And I'm also planning to darken it. The original model as bad lightning from the sun in it. It's an attempt to deal with the problem that there are not really many possible props. Otherwise it would be just a plain hill and look kinda naked. The positioning is of the steles and the props is definitely up for discussion. I'm not saying I'm completely happy with it. Same with the colors. The other major problem with this task was the part where the mesh touches the surrounding topography. It's an organic building, so it can't just have a foundation. That's why I decided to go with gravel stones around the base. They will look cleaner in the final version.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...